Skip to main content

1-20 of 8,334 results for subject:Banks

Session X
2010-12

Type

+ Legislation (21) + Bills (10)
-
Private bills (1)
+ Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (7)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (6)
+ Delegated legislation (11)
-
Statutory instruments (11)
+ Members' contributions (7,422)
-
Business questions (38)
-
Maiden speeches (38)
-
Oral answers to questions (146)
-
Oral question time interventions (6)
+ Oral questions (201)
-
Prime Minister's questions (43)
-
Topical questions (39)
-
Points of order (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (7,069)
+ Parliamentary committees (55) + Committee proceedings (31)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (4)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (4)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (15)
-
Select Committee reports (13)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (7)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (46)
-
Command papers (5)
-
House of Commons papers (28)
-
House of Lords papers (9)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (5)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (180) + Debates (73)
-
Adjournment debates (6)
-
Backbench debates (3)
-
Budget debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (31)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (4)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
European Committee proceedings (4)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (2)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (15)
-
Debates on select committee reports (2)
+ Legislative debates (32)
-
Debates on bills (24)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (6)
+ Monarch's speech debates (2)
-
Queen's speech debates (2)
-
Opposition days (5)
+ Formal proceedings (3)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (2)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)
+ Statements (100) + Oral statements (30)
-
Ministerial statements (30)
-
Written statements (70)
-
Urgent questions (3)
+ Parliamentary questions (918)
-
Business questions (38)
+ Oral questions (201)
-
Prime Minister's questions (43)
-
Topical questions (39)
-
Urgent questions (3)
-
Written questions (676)
+ Petitions and observations (2)
-
Observations on petitions (1)
-
Paper petitions (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Sassoon on 23 April (WA 298), whether UK Financial Investments Ltd has used its shareholder vote at any annual general meeting of a company of which it is a shareholder.

Asked by
Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 April 2012
Reference
16980; 736 c432WA
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what assessment his Department has made of the effect on UK borrowers of the EU Bank Capital Requirements Directive.

Asked by
Marcus Jones (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 April 2012
Reference
102322; 543 c1180W
House
House of Commons

My honourable friend the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Mr Nick Hurd) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. On 21 March last year, the Minister for the Cabinet Office and I updated the House on proposals and next steps for establishing a big society bank that would act as the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Written statements
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c142-3WS
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c693
House
House of Commons

That should ideally be the situation, and when the new regulations are produced there should be a careful consideration of whether any up-front fees should be paid to debt management companies. New clause 10 would require mortgage lenders to inform existing customers about potential interest rate changes. I have to...

Member
Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c711
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the hon. Lady's comments, but if she cannot support the new clause, will she at least join me in encouraging the regulator to ensure that all banks think about informing customers of potential interest rate changes as a matter of course? One bank doing it would not be...

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c712
House
House of Commons

Yes, I do. Many people in the banking sector would probably disagree, but I believe that anything over 50% is far too high. It is obscene and immoral to allow companies to go on charging vast amounts of interest—I do not care who they are—and that is why we have...

Member
Neil Parish (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c721
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of proposals for tighter controls over the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor).

Asked by
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
16795; 736 c299WA
House
House of Lords

Financial Services Bill. Programme motion (No. 3) agreed to on division (277 votes to 183). Report stage of Bill as amended in Public Bill Committee, first day.

Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c686-780
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that this is not just a matter of the relationship between the Government and this House, as it also relates to the relationship between the Government and the public? As we move into a period of austerity, if there is not sufficient accountability for the...

Member
Diane Abbott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c756
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for giving way. Much as I support a good deal of what the hon. Member for North Swindon (Justin Tomlinson) said, I think he misunderstands the situation. Many of my constituents have tried to negotiate, but these companies will not respond to constituents individually as...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c723
House
House of Commons

There is a sense of déjà vu, as the Bill Committee spent a lot of time debating this measure. The hon. Gentleman talks about what he perceives is the present Government's blind spot, but the previous Government's was clearly a regulatory system that was woefully inadequate to cope with the...

Member
David Rutley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c738-9
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a characteristically powerful speech about his concerns about various products and what the FCA should do to move things forward. I am concerned about some of the speeches and interventions from the Opposition, who are trying to be too prescriptive about what the FCA should...

Member
David Rutley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c724-5
House
House of Commons

I will give way, but there are a number of other amendments I have to talk about.

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c704
House
House of Commons

What is important is that the PRA establishes its process for consultation with regulated firms. It is required to set out in its annual report its process of consultation. In conclusion, this is an important part of the legislation, and I am very disappointed that the hon. Member for Nottingham...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c767
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the rationale that the hon. Gentleman is putting forward and that he is trying to protect customers, but I have to agree with my hon. Friend the Member for Vale of Glamorgan (Alun Cairns) on the impracticality of the proposal. There now seems to be a tendency to...

Member
David Rutley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c704
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
David Mowat (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c746
House
House of Commons

I was just coming to my conclusion and am conscious that other Members wish to speak, so I will not give way. I simply urge the House to vote for the amendment in the hope that the House of Lords will improve clause 5.

Member
Chris Leslie (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c746
House
House of Commons

One can see many scenarios. I have seen many political philanthropists since I have been a Member of Parliament. I worry because they come to the House as politicians, but seem not to want to do anything or take any responsibility. They have offloaded power to quangos and agencies, and...

Member
George Mudie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c750-1
House
House of Commons

I agree with very much of what my hon. Friend says. When the Bank of England was given its independence—so-called—I thought that if it started to fly in the face of what was obviously sensible for the economy, a Government might choose to take that independence back to the Treasury...

Member
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
543 c750
House
House of Commons