Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Burt of Solihull (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 April 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.


Financial Services Bill

That should ideally be the situation, and when the new regulations are produced there should be a careful consideration of whether any up-front fees should be paid to debt management companies. New clause 10 would require mortgage lenders to inform existing customers about potential interest rate changes. I have to declare an interest: I was a mortgage adviser in one of my past lives, so I know a little bit about the matter, and I suggest that any reputable mortgage company should do that anyway. It is not in their interests to encourage people to take on mortgages that they will not be able to repay should financial circumstances worsen. The new clause may therefore be superfluous. I completely understand and appreciate the sentiment behind it, but the matter will probably fall within the FCA rules and within the ethical behaviour that one should expect from any mortgage lender.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
543 c711 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Consumers Accountability Debts Banks Credit Advisory services Bank of England Fees and charges Financial services Financial institutions Interest rates Public appointments Mortgages Loans Office of Fair Trading Standards Regulation Repayments Trading standards Pre-payment Financial Policy Committee Financial Conduct Authority Prudential Regulation Authority Money Advice Service
Legislation
Financial Services Bill 2010-12 to 2012-13
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk