Skip to main content

1-20 of 373 results for house:"House of Lords"

Session X
2012-13
Subject X
Financial Policy Committee

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Financial Policy Committee (373)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Greg Clark
Department
Treasury
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
19 March 2013
Reference
SI 2013/642
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Greg Clark
Department
Treasury
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
8 March 2013
Reference
SI 2013/472
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Newby
Answering member
Lord Eatwell
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 cc141-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the background to these regulations is the failure of the previous system for regulating financial services to provide clear responsibility for financial stability, which was shared in an opaque way between the Treasury, the Bank of England and the FSA. This meant that it has been all too...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 cc142-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that was an interesting introduction to this order as it spent most of its time discussing measures that are not included. It also began with a preamble that was an extraordinary rewrite of history, referring to a failure to identify macroprudential risks prior to 2008. Will the Minister...

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 cc145-6GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for those extremely thoughtful questions, and I will do my best to answer them. He said that systemic risk was not on the horizon before the crisis. I think that the phrase was first used in academic literature

in 1979. Although the phrase...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 cc146-7GC
House
House of Lords

Why not?

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 c147GC
House
House of Lords

The Government said in response to Vickers that they believed he was going too far, and I do not believe that that view has changed. The noble Lord asked about the loan-to-value ratio and whether that tool would not have the same effect as introducing a loan-to-value ratio. In an...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 cc147-8GC
House
House of Lords

Let us suppose that we are in the situation that we are in today, that there is no direction in place and that we wish to reduce the own funds. How do we do that?

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 c148GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do think that that is an eventuality that the order caters for because, as the noble Lord says, it uses “increase”. If I am wrong on that, I shall let him know but, as he has said, the order is relatively straightforward. It will be for the...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 c148GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, perhaps we could go back to how an increased level of risk is to be specified by the FPC. Is that to be specified as a change in risk weights in old-fashioned Basel I structures, or is it to be specified as a modification of...

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 c148GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I said earlier, the PRA will set overall levels; the capital models allowed by firms will, I believe be determined by the PRA.

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 c148GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry, but the noble Lord contradicts the instrument before us. It states clearly,

“if they gave rise to an increased level of risk specified by the FPC”.

It is not the PRA, it is the FPC that has to specify this increased level of risk.

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 c148GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am told that the FPC has the discretion to do either or both of those things, but the PRA will scrutinise how the FPC’s levels are implemented by individual firms.

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 February 2013
Reference
743 c149GC
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government when interviews will be held for the appointment of external members of the Bank of England’s Financial Policy Committee; and whether they will publish the names of those serving on the interview panel, identifying any HM Treasury officials.[HL4888]

Asked by
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
742 c343WA; HL4888
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in response to an amendment at Report put forward by my noble friends Lady Noakes, Lady Wheatcroft and Lady Kramer, we committed to come back with amendments to rebalance the FPC’s membership. These amendments are intended to do just that. They will remove the executive director responsible for...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2012
Reference
741 c670
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the amendment relates to something originally in the Bank of England Act 1998 which should not have been there in the first place. My noble friend Lord Peston and I tried very hard for it not to be put in but failed at the time. I hope that...

Member
Lord Barnett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2012
Reference
741 cc670-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to add two or three remarks to what my noble friend Lord Barnett has said.

On any logical grounds, “equal weight” is precisely what the Government would want to see in this part of the Bill. One feels that somehow the computer got jammed and “subject to...

Member
Lord Peston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2012
Reference
741 c671
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support some of the sentiments, but not the Amendment, of the noble Lords, Lord Barnett and Lord Peston. Like them, I believe it would be a good thing if Mr Carney were to appear before the Lords Economic Affairs Committee as well as the Commons Treasury Committee....

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2012
Reference
741 c672
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will make sure that the suggestion to Mr Carney is passed on, but of course it is breaking radical new ground that a prospective governor should appear before the Treasury Select Committee, and I do not know whether we want to be too radical at this juncture,...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 December 2012
Reference
741 cc672-3
House
House of Lords