Skip to main content

1-20 of 40 results for subject:"Select Committee reports"

Session X
2014-15

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what arrangements have been made to publish regularly a list of the time they have taken to respond to reports from Select Committees of this House.

Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 February 2015
Reference
HL4435
House
House of Lords

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker. It is important for the House to understand that the Select Committee was simply operating in such a way as to ensure that our report was helpful in terms of the legislation coming forward—the Infrastructure Bill that we shall be dealing with...

Member
Joan Walley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2015
Reference
591 c567
House
House of Commons

Further to that point of order, Mr Speaker.

Member
Tim Yeo (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2015
Reference
591 c568
House
House of Commons

Yes, directly, Mr Speaker. You made reference to two Select Committee reports, one from the Environmental Audit Committee and one from the Transport Committee, directly relevant to this Bill. May I also draw the House’s attention to the fact that my Energy and Climate Change Committee has reported twice in...

Member
Tim Yeo (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 January 2015
Reference
591 c568
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Speaker. You will be aware that the Chair of the Environmental Audit Committee last week tabled an amendment to the Infrastructure Bill based on the Committee’s findings but ahead of their publication. Obviously we are all aware that it is a clear breach of...

Member
David TC Davies (Conservative)
Type
Points of order
Date
26 January 2015
Reference
591 c567
House
House of Commons

My Lords, is not any response to a coalition government fairly simple: that we do not want another one?

Asked by
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c656
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think we are all going to fight the election to win.

Answered by
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c656
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister is no doubt aware that a regular scorecard is now published on failures to fulfil the scrutiny procedures of the European Union. There is a scorecard of scrutiny overrides allocated by department. Would she consider carefully whether a similar regular scorecard could be published on reports of this House, with the identification of the government departments that are in arrears? This scorecard approach gently brings pressure to bear on people in a way that has been quite useful.

Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c656
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord raises an interesting point. One of the things that I have been looking at in preparing to respond to this Question is whether records are even kept in the House itself as to how timely the Government respond to reports. We would benefit if we could improve record-keeping.

Answered by
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c656
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest, in that the report from the committee that I had the privilege of chairing on the Inquiries Act has been outstanding since 11 March 2014. However, there is a good reason for that, as we were not happy with the response. We did not feel that it was good enough. We thought it could be significantly improved upon. The Question starts on the basis of quality and timeliness, but would my noble friend agree that quality is the most important thing here? Timeliness is a wonderful thing, but the quality of the report is what we really want.

Asked by
Lord Shutt of Greetland (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c656
House
House of Lords

My noble friend makes an important point. I believe that the quality of government responses to reports is the most important thing. I also say to the House that the written responses to Select Committee reports are not the only way that we should judge how the Government are responding to inquiries undertaken by Select Committees. If you look, for instance, at the Mental Capacity Act inquiry, which was another post-legislative scrutiny report, that committee made some very important recommendations that the Department of Health has responded to and acted on. Some changes that are important to the people affected are now taking place.

Answered by
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c656
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I notice that one of the reports that we are waiting for is on a report of the Communications Committee on

broadcast general election debates, which was published on 13 May last year. Are we still awaiting the government response? The election is only a few weeks away, so I would have thought it would be timely for us to have a debate—or is the Prime Minister frit?

Asked by
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c656
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Lord is stretching the point here. The report he highlighted as one that has not yet been responded to has not been raised with me. If the relevant committee wanted to raise that as a concern with me then clearly I would raise it with my colleagues in government.

Answered by
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c657
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as chairman of the Communications Committee, might I point out to the noble Lord opposite that the report he referred to specifically said it was not looking for a response from government? However, earlier today I made a request through the clerk that we should have a debate on this report.

Asked by
Lord Inglewood (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c657
House
House of Lords

I am glad for my noble friend’s clarification that the committee had produced a report that did not require a response from the Government, and I look forward to discussing further his request for a debate.

Answered by
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c657
House
House of Lords

My Lords, would the Minister accept that the Select Committee structure is one of the great strengths of this House? I served for many years on the Science and Technology Select Committee and had the privilege of chairing several sub-committee inquiries. One of those, relating to research in the NHS, led to the Culyer report, then to the establishment of the National Institute for Health Research and now has led on to the development of the massive Crick centre for research in the centre of London. Can the Minister give us any inkling as to the extent to which Select Committee reports in this House have led to major changes in government policy over the last few years?

Asked by
Lord Walton of Detchant (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c657
House
House of Lords

As the noble Lord knows from the exchange he and I had last week in the debate about the effectiveness of this House, I acknowledged then his strong point that the work of Select Committees in this House is an incredibly important part of our work here. On the Science and Technology Committee, during this Parliament there has been some action by the Government in response to implementing long-term science capital investment, which was a recommendation that came out of that committee.

Answered by
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c657
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can my noble friend indicate whether she might have a look at the experience of the other place and consider whether the authority of our Select Committees might be greatly enhanced if the chairman were elected.

Asked by
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c657
House
House of Lords

My noble friend raises an interesting point, but I do not think that it has been raised particularly extensively by other noble Lords. Probably, one of the reasons for that is because we are

all very clear in this House that all the chairmen of our Select Committees, regardless of which part of the House they are from, act very independently.

Answered by
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c657
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the noble Baroness agree that the debate around this Question has been slightly confused? We appear to be discussing, on the one hand, whether the Government have responded to a Select Committee report and, on the other, whether that committee report and the response have been debated in this House. For the benefit of those of us who have forgotten, can the noble Baroness explain to the House the procedure whereby, once the Government have responded, a Select Committee report comes forward for debate?

Asked by
Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 January 2015
Reference
758 c658
House
House of Lords