Skip to main content

1-20 of 139 results for subject:Medals

Session X
2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 20 April 2017 to Question 70281, if he will take steps to grant posthumous awards for (a) Lady MacRobert and (b) other non-service personnel.

Asked by
Ian Murray (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
71640
House
House of Commons

I am sure everyone in the House will want to join me in paying tribute to the thousands who worked in munitions factories in both world wars, often in very dangerous conditions. They produced vital equipment for the armed forces that helped us to victory. I am sure my hon. Friend will recognise that, for practical reasons, it is not possible to pursue individual awards, but the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy would be happy to work with him to look at further ways of recognising the collective effort of former munitions workers.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 March 2017
Reference
624 c246
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for that answer. These ladies found that the chemicals in the shells turned their skin yellow, and they were nicknamed canary girls. I know my right hon. Friend is exceptionally busy at the moment, but could she find just a few moments in her diary to meet me and some of these canary girls to recognise their service?

Asked by
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2017
Reference
624 c246
House
House of Commons

I would be very happy to meet some canary girls. As I said, their work was vital to the war effort. Their work was, in one sense, absolutely routine, but in another sense, it was extremely dangerous, and we should recognise their efforts.

Answered by
Baroness May of Maidenhead (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 March 2017
Reference
624 c246
House
House of Commons

If she will introduce an award in recognition of the contribution made by munitions workers in the First and Second World Wars.

Asked by
Bill Wiggin (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2017
Reference
909566; 624 c246
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1343
House
House of Commons

As I said on Second Reading, I do not support the Bill. In fact, as I went through it with a view to amending it, what struck me was that, in many respects, I was trying to amend the unamendable. I cannot emphasise enough, however, how much I understand the...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 cc1345-7
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend think that this new clause would deal adequately with the points raised by the Royal Air Force Families Federation in its written evidence to the Defence Committee?

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1347
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a pertinent point. I will come to that in a moment.

I know that it is not the intention of the Bill to create the outcome I have just described, but it remains a possibility. As my hon. Friend says, the Royal Air Force Families Federation said...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 cc1347-8
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has obviously done a lot of work on defining what he means by a family member for these purposes. Did I hear him correctly when he said that this was based on housing legislation?

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1348
House
House of Commons

I took the basic definition of a family member from section 113 of the Housing Act 1985, although I am conscious that my definition is wider.

The 1985 Act’s definition was a starting point, but I would like to think that I have brought it a bit more up to...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1348
House
House of Commons

In that case, I congratulate my hon. Friend on his innovative drafting.

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1349
House
House of Commons

From someone as esteemed as my hon. Friend, that is high praise indeed.

New clause 8 would require the Government on, or as near as possible to, the 12-month anniversary of the Bill’s enactment to place before each House of Parliament figures showing the number of convictions, and the sentences handed...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1349
House
House of Commons

Under the Fraud Act 2006 it is still an offence to make, or to attempt to make, a financial gain by fraudulently wearing uniforms or medals. Does my hon. Friend have any information on how many times that provision has been applied in law?

Member
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1349
House
House of Commons

I apologise to my hon. Friend for not being well enough prepared to answer his question, but I do not have that information. I do not even know whether anyone has that information. Someone might have it, but I do not.

New clause 9 states:

“(1) This Act shall expire at the...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1349
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that new clause 9 strengthens the case for accepting new clause 8? New clause 8 would make things far easier for those wanting to assess the success, or otherwise, of the Bill.

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1349
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. New clauses 8 and 9, in many respects, go together. If we had a sunset clause, we would need to be able to measure the success, or otherwise, of the legislation, and the reporting set out in new clause 8 would help

with that...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 cc1349-1350
House
House of Commons

I listened closely to the hon. Gentleman as he set out his new clauses, but I wonder whether he actually read the Official Report of the Public Bill Committee, where the Bill enjoyed strong support from Members on both sides of the Committee, including from former members of the armed...

Member
Stephen Doughty (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1350
House
House of Commons

If the points had already been covered, my amendments and new clauses would not have been selected. They were selected because those points are not covered by the Bill. That is the whole point. I cannot table an amendment to do something that is already in the Bill, because it...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1350
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend suggesting that if someone goes around wearing a fake Victoria Cross, they should not be covered by this legislation, and that they should be covered by it only if they have a genuine one that they have stolen?

Member
James Cartlidge (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2017
Reference
621 c1350
House
House of Commons