Skip to main content

1-20 of 522 results for subject:"Legal Services Commission"

Subject X
Appeals

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Appeals (522)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
7 May 2012
Reference
DEP2012-0756
House
House of Lords

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 24 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 24A. 24A Because it would alter the financial arrangements made by the Commons, and the Commons do not offer any further Reason, trusting that this reason may be deemed sufficient.

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1592
House
House of Lords

My Lords, noble Lords gave great attention to this issue in earlier stages. I hope that the discussions that have resulted, both within and outside the Chamber, have helped to reassure them. I begin by saying that the Government have always agreed that telephone legal aid advice will not be...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1592-4
House
House of Lords

Let us assume that that person has come to you as a constituency Member of Parliament—I think that is the kind of case the noble Lord is talking about. Again, the Member of Parliament could phone the helpline and say that, for the reasons given by the noble Lord, in...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1600-2
House
House of Lords

I understand what my noble friend means about getting to that point. I ask him to ask himself how they would get to face-to-face advice. There they are with a major problem. They may very well end up in a CAB, in which case the CAB may assist them in...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1600
House
House of Lords

My noble friend assures me that we will review how this is working and publish the findings. I am sure that noble Lords will scrutinise that with the greatest of care. I reiterate that the operation of the system will be monitored from the very beginning. Therefore, noble Lords do...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1602
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their attention to this very important area and I especially thank the noble Baroness, Lady Grey-Thompson, for her kind words to my noble friend about his engagement with her concerns. I have a note that I need to correct the figure given for...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1599-600
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness may be right about social workers providing legal advice but I am talking about the kind of support that a social worker can give to a child in that situation. Often it is not a matter of specific legal advice but of assisting that child and steering...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1670-1
House
House of Lords

It is very straightforward. As I have just said, 96 per cent of current spend on cases is included, and in terms of numbers of cases 13 per cent are outside. So 4 per cent of spend is outside, which represents 13 per cent of the number of cases. The...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1670
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their very important contributions to this debate. At the beginning of this discussion, I set out in some detail the reasons behind the Government's position on legal aid for children, and that legal aid should apply to the highest priority cases, which has...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1669
House
House of Lords

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 171 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 171A. That this House do not insist on its Amendment 171 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 171A. 171A Because it would alter the financial arrangements made by...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1664
House
House of Lords

Motion J concerns legal aid for children. When the Government undertook their comprehensive review of legal aid, we looked at the principles of each type of case funded by the scheme and considered, first, the importance of the issue; secondly, the litigant's ability to present their own case, including and...

Member
Baroness Northover (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1664-5
House
House of Lords

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 1 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 1A. That this House do not insist on its Amendment 1 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 1A. 1A Because it would alter the financial arrangements made by...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1556
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord will allow me, he is saying that great attention has been given to the various issues that have been raised, for example by the noble Lord, Lord Alton. Is it not the case, however, that on some of these issues there was initially no debate in...

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1558
House
House of Lords

My Lords, today the House has the opportunity to consider the Commons reasons in response to the amendments passed by this House during its consideration of this Bill. We have engaged in complex, informed and sometimes passionate debate on a wide range of issues that are of fundamental importance. In...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1556-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before leaving that point, it was the Minister who raised the question of procedure and who said that these matters had been thoroughly dealt with in another place. The fact remains that the issue of mesothelioma, which was quite properly raised by the Minister's noble friend Lord Higgins,...

Member
Lord Alton of Liverpool (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1559
House
House of Lords

The four interventions, interestingly, have all come from ex-Members of the other place. Motion A and Amendment 1 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, described by him on Report as a purpose clause, reflect that which features in the Access to Justice Act 1999. Amendment 1 would...

Member
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1559-60
House
House of Lords

At end insert ““but do propose Amendment 1B as an amendment in lieu”” 1B Page 1, line 5, leave out subsection (1) and insert— ““(1) The Lord Chancellor shall exercise his powers under this Part with a view to securing that individuals have access to legal services that effectively meet...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1560
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as your Lordships have heard, the amendment that noble Lords approved on Report by a majority of 45 votes would state the purpose of legal aid: to promote access to legal services within the financial resources that are made available by the Lord Chancellor and subject to the...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1560-2
House
House of Lords

Can the noble Lord explain what this amendment therefore adds to the provisions in the Bill? That is what puzzles me.

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 April 2012
Reference
736 c1562
House
House of Lords