Skip to main content

1-20 of 654 results for subject:Diseases

Subject X
Clones

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Clones (654)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I note that the order in which the amendments are printed in the Order Paper is also not in accordance with the usual convention. Normally, the new clauses are printed first, followed by the amendments in the order in which they relate to...

Member
Lynne Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c323
House
House of Commons

I hear what my hon. Friend says, but we have to deal with what we are faced with today. The amendments are carefully phrased. We are looking at mitochondrial opportunities to deal with diseases that someone might carry, but the amendments would make it absolutely clear that that should not...

Member
David Drew (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c343-5
House
House of Commons

As always, I am grateful to my right hon. Friend. I want to be reassured by the Minister telling me that tetraploid complementation is fully covered by the definitions in the Bill, but according to a written answer given by Lord Hunt, that type of chimeric embryo is not covered....

Member
David Burrowes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c351-2
House
House of Commons

There is absolutely no reason that I can think of why such research should not be banned if people cannot state clearly the identifiable benefits that could be derived from it. That is quite apart from the question of whether humankind can be crossed with other primates—that, of course, is...

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c342
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for that intervention. Obviously, with the professional knowledge that he gained before he came to this place, he has a deep understanding of the scientific complexities and the need for these procedures. The briefing from the scientific community continues:"““Research of this nature is...

Member
Kevin Barron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c362
House
House of Commons

No. I am trying to make some brief comments—

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c408
House
House of Commons

The process was demanding because we were invited to consider issues that strike at the heart of what it means to be human. We have also looked—

Member
Baroness Primarolo (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c408
House
House of Commons

I leave that to stand. I would also say that if a scientist wanted to avoid a criminal charge, it would be wise to apply for a licence. Even if the scientist felt that the circumstance would not be covered by the definition, if it turned out to be covered,...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c370
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c385
House
House of Commons

Further to that point of order, Mr. Speaker. I do realise that, on the subject of the programme motion, it is within the powers of the House to alter the order of debate, but you do have certain powers, which are governed by convention, protecting the practice of the House...

Member
Lord Clarke of Nottingham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c323
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. There is a new clause in the first sequence of amendments.

Member
John Pugh (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c322
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I should be grateful for your advice and I am sorry that I have not had a chance to give you advance notice of this point of order. During business questions, we were told by the Leader of the House in answer to...

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c322
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr. Speaker. I am sure that you will tell me if this is not an appropriate time to raise this point of order, but in view of the fact that the Minister is about to move a programme motion relating to the order in which...

Member
Gerald Kaufman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c321-2
House
House of Commons

Certainly the issues are complex and certainly there has been a desire at an early stage for clarity. Whether we have all been swept along by that complexity is perhaps for others to judge. There is certainly a need for clarity, however, particularly in the definitions. I would like to...

Member
David Burrowes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c347-8
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has been demonstrating how complex are these questions. Is it not true that one has a simple question to ask as well—that is, what would the general public, on whichever side they happen to be, expect us to do in trying to deal with these questions? Would...

Member
Lord Deben (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c348
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my right hon. Friend. That is the least the public would expect of us. They may or may not agree with the principles and the practical results, but at the very least they would expect the Bill to cover researched examples of animal-human embryos. It is...

Member
David Burrowes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c349-50
House
House of Commons

I am following the hon. Gentleman's argument with interest. Will he explain whether it is his understanding that if such an entity were implanted into animal, a licence would be required from the Animal Procedures Committee?

Member
Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c350
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that intervention. If the hon. Gentleman bears with me, I shall come shortly to the issue of the licence. The fourth reason for the amendment is that proposed new section 4A(4) to the 1990 Act bans the implantation of human admixed embryos in an animal. Since...

Member
David Burrowes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c350
House
House of Commons

For the sake of clarity, will the hon. Gentleman say whether he is referring to mid-gestation in the species into which the implant has been made?

Member
Robert Flello (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c350
House
House of Commons

Let me give an example. The procedure has been used in mice since the early 1990s, and it is routinely used to make entire mice from embryonic stem cells, which are being aggregated with tetraploid embryos. When used in this way, the procedure is considered a gold standard for testing,...

Member
David Burrowes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 October 2008
Reference
481 c351
House
House of Commons