Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,769 results for subject:Protection

Subject X
Conditions of employment

Type

+ Legislation (32) + Acts (3)
-
Public acts (3)
+ Bills (5) + Public bills (5)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (2)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (24)
-
Statutory instruments (24)
+ Members' contributions (2,457)
-
Business questions (1)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (35)
+ Oral questions (35)
-
Prime Minister's questions (6)
-
Proceeding contributions (2,387)
+ Parliamentary committees (67) + Committee proceedings (46)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (7)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (8)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (19)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Select Committee reports (14)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (3)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (67)
-
Command papers (4)
-
Consultation papers (7)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (3)
-
Deposited papers (36)
-
House of Commons papers (17)
-
House of Lords papers (8)
-
Impact assessments (6)
-
Unprinted papers (1)
-
White papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (116) + Debates (99)
-
Adjournment debates (2)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (46)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (2)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (7)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (8)
-
European Committee proceedings (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (19)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (2)
-
Debates on select committee reports (3)
+ Legislative debates (83)
-
Debates on bills (67)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (16)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (14) + Oral statements (5)
-
Ministerial statements (4)
-
Written statements (9)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (116)
-
Business questions (1)
+ Oral questions (35)
-
Prime Minister's questions (6)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (79)
+ Research briefings (18) + Commons Briefing papers (15)
-
Briefing papers on bills (3)
-
Commons Debate packs (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Conditions of employment (2,769)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business and Trade Committee
Date
14 July 2026
Reference
HC 479 2026-27
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to the Motion that Clause 40 does not stand part. As I explained at Second Reading, I have no professional knowledge of the banking industry but, because of circumstances, for more than 14 years I have been in this Room talking about the finance industry and...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc110-1GC
House
House of Lords

I support Amendment 160A. I want to start by briefly addressing a couple of issues raised by the noble Lord, Lord Pitt-Watson. Most importantly, I want briefly to quote the conclusions of the Skeoch report. The panel judges that the ring-fence

“is worth retaining at present”

but adds a number of considerations:

“The...

Member
Lord Massey of Hampstead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c111GC
House
House of Lords

I did indeed talk to senior members of the Skeoch commission before writing my speech, and what I said is completely consistent with the conclusions of the Skeoch commission, which was set up by the previous Conservative Government, as I said.

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c112GC
House
House of Lords

I am just reading the conclusions from the report, my Lords. They make it very clear that the continuation of ring-fencing made sense at the time the report was written, but the commission clearly envisaged that it might not be needed over the passage of time. I also remind noble...

Member
Lord Massey of Hampstead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c112GC
House
House of Lords

I find it difficult to believe that someone has told me that the withdrawal of Glass-Steagall, which took place 13 years before the global financial crisis, had no detriment to the American banking system. As I say, I have read the Skeoch report and discussed it with senior members of...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c112GC
House
House of Lords

I also draw attention to the abolition of FOS, which the noble Lord mentioned. I draw the Committee’s attention to Amendment 172A, which discusses the changes proposed to FOS. It is to be abolished and replaced with something called the financial adjudication service, which is a broadly similar methodology to...

Member
Lord Massey of Hampstead (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc112-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have some experience of ring-fencing as, in my capacity as the chairman of the risk committee of a major bank, I oversaw the implementation of ring-fencing. At that time, it was a significant risk to the bank that we would not be in compliance with the ring-fencing...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c113GC
House
House of Lords

There were two points, one of which is that the Skeoch report says that the numbers given are not its numbers. The report is clear that whatever the cost of ring-fencing, it is not a cost to the economy—this is what the Vickers report said earlier

—and that, by removing...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c113GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I understand the point that the noble Lord is trying to make, but I argue that the risk of the taxpayer picking up the tab is now considerably lower, which means that it is reasonable to re-examine whether ring-fencing should be an ongoing part of the regime.

I was...

Member
Baroness Noakes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c114GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it has been an unusual experience to have had a debate with two sides to it on the Bill; the Minister must be pleased about that. I am afraid that I sit firmly on the fence—indeed, on the ring-fence. I am in two minds on this issue. Ring-fencing...

Member
Lord Vaux of Harrowden (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc114-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to have the debate, and I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Pitt-Watson, for raising questions which have encouraged debate, but I support my noble friend Lady Neville-Rolfe’s opposition to Clause 39 standing part of the Bill. I also support her Amendment 160A...

Member
Baroness Lawlor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc115-6GC
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether there might be some confusion here. The thing about the ring-fence is that there are activities within it that the Government are promising to bail out. Those things are being insured. By the way, the move in the ring-fence proposed by the Government will extend these a...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c116GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, but it is about where the line is drawn in law, so that businesses can be certain and have predictability, because activities change day by day.

Member
Baroness Lawlor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c116GC
House
House of Lords

With respect, that is what Skeoch is recommending and what is being allowed in what we are being asked to accept here—there is an extension of the ring-fence. He is saying, “Look, there are other important activities that go beyond the ring-fence that are administratively complicated for the banks. Please...

Member
Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c116GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, but he was speaking about 2022, which was light years away for the financial sector. Things have moved on and have changed. We have different regimes in place now. As my noble friend Lady Noakes has explained, the banks are now resolvable. There are other...

Member
Baroness Lawlor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc116-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support Amendments 159 and 174 in the names of the noble Baroness, Lady Neville-Rolfe, and the noble Lord, Lord Altrincham. I would be concerned about abolishing the ring-fence for similar reasons and concerns as those expressed by the noble Lord, Lord Vaux. However, I believe that a...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 c117GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thought the Committee might like to be reminded why such a radical step as ring-fencing was taken after the 2008 financial crisis. It was in part because, in a universal bank encompassing both retail and wholesale banking, failure in the investment bank could and did destroy the...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc117-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have enjoyed this exchange of views today. As the noble Lord, Lord Vaux, pointed out, it is refreshing and a little unsettling to find myself in the middle ground in a debate.

Before I turn to the specific amendments and stand part notices, it may be helpful if...

Member
Lord Stockwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc119-122GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to noble Lords who have contributed to this lively debate, and to the Minister for his response. I am grateful for the support I have received, particularly for my Amendments 159 and 174 and, from some of my noble friends, for Amendments 160A. While I agree with...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 July 2026
Reference
858 cc122-3GC
House
House of Lords