Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Pitt-Watson (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 8 July 2026. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL].


Financial Services and Markets Bill [HL]

With respect, that is what Skeoch is recommending and what is being allowed in what we are being asked to accept here—there is an extension of the ring-fence. He is saying, “Look, there are other important activities that go beyond the ring-fence that are administratively complicated for the banks. Please can you move this? Also, can you move this in a way so that it doesn’t need to go to primary legislation any time it needs to change, because all these things are moving?” What we are trying to do here is recognise that the independent commission is run by a senior financial businessperson—he used to run Standard Life—whom we are going to back. He indeed said that, in the long term, you may want to think about how ring-fencing goes together with the resolution regime, but that is not for now. He certainly did not say that we should abandon it.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
858 c116GC 
Session
2026-27
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Education Complaints Conditions of employment Consumers Bank services Banks City of London Corporation Commercial secrets Digital technology Finance Financial services Innovation Insurance Financial markets Protection Payments Managers Proof of identity Financial Ombudsman Service Regulation Capital markets Small businesses Tax avoidance Financial Conduct Authority Prudential Regulation Authority Digital assets
Legislation
Financial Services and Markets Bill (HL) 2026-27
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk