Skip to main content

1-20 of 703 results for subject:Deployment

Subject X
Crime

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Crime (703)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) Metropolitan Police and (b) other police force full-time equivalent police officers were working on (i) Operation Trident and (ii) Operation Sapphire in (A) 2010-11 and (B) 2011-12; and if she will make a statement.

[139431]

Asked by
Gareth Thomas (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Home Department
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 January 2013
Reference
139431; 557 c540W
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Croydon, Central (Mr. Pelling) not only on securing the debate, but on the measured way in which he stated his case. I am happy to join him in recognising the excellent work the police do to tackle crime and protect our communities, including his...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2009
Reference
491 c318-22WH
House
House of Commons

Mr. Benton, this is my first time that I have served under your chairmanship, and a great pleasure it is, too. I thank the Speaker for selecting this subject for debate and the Minister, who has a busy diary, for spending time to come to answer to this Adjournment debate....

Member
Andrew Pelling (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 April 2009
Reference
491 c315-8WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on policing in Croydon.

Lead member
Andrew Pelling
Answering member
Alan Campbell
Department
Home Office
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
29 April 2009
Reference
491 c315-22WH
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I oppose the amendment. First, new subsection (1) does not have sufficient flexibility to implement the UN protocol. For instance, as drafted, it would mean that service personnel under 18 could not deploy on overseas exercises or ships—certainly not overseas exercises outside NATO or EU states. A good...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c615
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we cannot support the amendment. I believe that it would be inappropriate and unnecessarily restrictive to put such a provision in statutory form, worthy though some of the motives behind doing so may be. There are long-established and important procedures relating to under-18s, some of which the noble...

Member
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c615
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I may be corrected, but while going around the apprentice college at Harrogate and the subsequent training facility at Catterick, I have observed that one can be a trained soldier at 17 just as well as at 18. They have the same responsibilities. One cannot base something on...

Member
Viscount Slim (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c616-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I listened carefully to the noble Lord, Lord Garden, presenting and explaining his amendment. When I looked at it before he spoke, it seemed like a multiple independent military vehicle. First, it says clearly in subsection (1), "““under the age of 18””." I was not aware until my...

Member
Lord Lyell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c616
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister will be unsurprised that I have not been reassured by his reiteration of the Government’s position. Various noble Lords explained why it is difficult to do the things that this amendment requires. It is certainly difficult, but there is an international perspective that 18 is the...

Member
Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c619-20
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before turning to Amendment No. 6, I want to say that during our most useful debate in Committee, the noble Lord, Lord Garden, mentioned that I may have been mistaken in referring to recruits under the age of 18 at Harrogate. Of course, he was quite correct in...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c617-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall be brief. We now know, as the noble Lord, Lord Drayson, said on 12 October, that arrangements for these flights are, "““part of the normal arrangements between states””.—[Official Report, 12/10/06; col. 440.]" We also know, from the noble Baroness, Lady Scotland of Asthal, on 18 October...

Member
Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c623-4
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 7: After Clause 359, insert the following new clause- ““FLIGHTS BY FOREIGN AIRCRAFTS AT MILITARY AIRFIELDS (1) The Defence Council may by regulations make provision for the handling of foreign aircraft at military facilities, to ensure that such aircraft are complying with United Kingdom legal requirements and...

Member
Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c622-3
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 6: After Clause 340, insert the following new clause- ““SPECIAL PROVISION FOR SERVICE PERSONNEL UNDER THE AGE OF 18 (1) Service personnel under the age of 18 are not permitted to serve in combat areas. (2) Service personnel under the age of 18 are not permitted to...

Member
Lord Garden (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c613-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Earl, Lord Attlee, has pointed out the gap or hole in the Bill. In response, the Minister pointed to the fact that a juvenile will be dealt with by a single judge advocate who has the powers of a judge in a youth court. Does that...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c611-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment No. 5 would prevent civilians who are under 18 years of age from being tried before the court martial. On24 October, the European Court of Human Rights gave its judgment in the case of Martin. We need to be clear about what it decided. The case was...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c609-11
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord said that I was suggesting that the court-martial system was deficient. Your Lordships might not take it from me, but you might take it from the unanimous decision of the European Court of Human Rights, pronounced a fortnight ago. It said that it was impossible...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c604-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in our earlier debates, the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, sought to prevent this Bill extending the jurisdiction of the military criminal justice system in relation to most serious offences committed in the United Kingdom. He argued for retaining the current legislative position and proposed an amendment...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c602-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the military in Scotland will be subject to the Bill. It will be open to the Director of Service Prosecutions to determine that an offence of murder committed in Scotland by a serviceman or a civilian subject to service law can be tried by a court martial.

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c602
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am a near neighbour of my noble friend Lady Carnegy. There is a very well known military establishment in the county of Angus and several other military establishments. What is the situation? Could the noble Lord clarify it?

Member
Lord Lyell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c602
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I remind the House of my interest as a serving TA officer. I have a lot of sympathy for this amendment, because I would not want to find myself on a court martial dealing with such a case. However, the amendment makes no provision for an alternative. If...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 November 2006
Reference
686 c609
House
House of Lords