Skip to main content

1-20 of 280 results for subject:Nuisance

Subject X
Desertion

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Desertion (280)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I have no reason to doubt what the hon. Gentleman said about the many people who have been charged and given life imprisonment, or even spent 10 years in prison. Why, therefore, do we need this piece of legislation?

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1228-9
House
House of Commons

Indeed, Mrs Heal. I was giving the example of someone who deserted without seeing action at all, although he had been a professional soldier for five years. On the argument advanced by the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington, a maximum penalty must cover all eventualities. The Minister asked him...

Member
Julian Brazier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1208-9
House
House of Commons

Four months.

Member
Bob Russell (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1209
House
House of Commons

I disagree. The measure does not say the sentence for desertion will automatically be life imprisonment, but up to life imprisonment, so there is flexibility in sentencing. The idea has been sold that somehow if one deserts one will automatically get life imprisonment, and that is not the case.

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1210
House
House of Commons

In conflict, if a platoon were reliant on an individual to hold a particular post and that individual decided to desert that post, putting at risk the lives of everyone in the platoon, would it not be important to have a severe consequence?

Member
Robert Flello (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1210
House
House of Commons

Four months, I am reminded, and some of us were more assiduous than others—[Interruption.] My hon. Friend the Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) says from a sedentary position that he would have deserted. In the present circumstances, the Government would have welcomed that. When I saw the amendments...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1209-10
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that there is a difference between a legal occupation and an illegal occupation?

Member
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1210
House
House of Commons

That is an argument that can be had around a specific campaign such as the one in Iraq. I am grateful to my hon. Friend, but he knows that we disagree on that. The important point is that if people have agreed to serve in Her Majesty’s armed forces, there...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1210
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend served long and hard on the Committee so he knows the Bill inside out, poor man. The amendment would maintain the two-year sanction, but not that of life imprisonment, which appears inhumane and barbaric.

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1210
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right on that particular issue. It is just as well that the amendment will not have the intended effects. If British servicemen were to carry out perfectly legal actions overseas, such as actions agreed by United Nations resolution, and were to conduct themselves entirely in accordance...

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1211-2
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the Bill benchmarks life imprisonment in statute?

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1212
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington (John McDonnell) on the measured way in which he has moved the amendments. I have some sympathy with where he is coming from, but I find myself unable to support them. They do not have quite the effect that the hon....

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1211
House
House of Commons

The Bill was presented as allowing the updating of service law, which gives us the opportunity to rid ourselves of some of the punitive punishments in existing law, one of which is life imprisonment. I would welcome the hon. Gentleman’s views on clause 40, which also introduces life imprisonment for...

Member
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1211
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend’s point goes to the kernel of the argument. In the armed forces the ultimate sanction must be there for the sake of military discipline in very difficult situations. As I have said, there is a great difference between conscripted armed forces and those who have volunteered and...

Member
Lord Beamish (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1210-1
House
House of Commons

We are being presented with two options—one is a maximum of two years, and the other is a maximum of life imprisonment. I have agreed as a general point of principle that life imprisonment would be over the top in any circumstances that I can envisage, but the only alternative...

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1212
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1212
House
House of Commons

Well, I will give him an example of where he is fence-sitting. Clause 8 provides for a life sentence for the offence of desertion. Only every now and then does a Bill come before us to amend the Armed Forces Acts. He might say that this is no different from...

Member
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1212
House
House of Commons

No; the Bill does not change the position. Existing statute allows a sentence of up to life imprisonment. I understand the point made by the hon. Member for Hayes and Harlington—that the Bill might have been an opportunity completely to modernise the legislation—but I do not accept the argument that...

Member
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1212
House
House of Commons

That was a very interesting contribution by the hon. Member for North Devon (Nick Harvey), and a typically Liberal one—it was a fence-sitting exercise.

Member
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1212
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mrs. Heal. We have some very quirky practices in the House, one of which has brought about the collapse of amendments to the Bill in Committee. A number of hon. Members wanted to table amendments, but because the House rose very early at about 1.30...

Member
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2006
Reference
446 c1203
House
House of Commons