Proceeding contribution from Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 22 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Armed Forces Bill.
Armed Forces Bill
We are being presented with two options—one is a maximum of two years, and the other is a maximum of life imprisonment. I have agreed as a general point of principle that life imprisonment would be over the top in any circumstances that I can envisage, but the only alternative is a maximum of two years. I have clearly expressed the view that that would not be adequate as a penalty for people committing a very serious offence by, having been deployed in perfectly legitimate circumstances, leaving their comrades in an unsustainable position. I did not sit on the fence—I came to a firm view.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 446 c1212
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Children Discipline Crime Armed forces Age Deployment Aircraft Courts martial Desertion Certification Custodial treatment Defence equipment Nuisance Prosecutions Military police Officers Sentencing
- Legislation
- Armed Forces Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2026-07-22 08:47:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325599
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325599
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_325599