Skip to main content

1-20 of 24 results for subject:Sutton

Subject X
Magistrates' courts

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Magistrates' courts (24)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

In the words of the Under-Secretary of State for Justice, the hon. Member for Lewisham, East (Bridget Prentice), Sutton magistrates court ““serves the community of Sutton…and it does so to a high standard.””—[ Official Report, 5 July 2006; Vol. 448, c. 277WH.] With the clustering of courts now proceeding, and Sutton magistrates court losing staff to Croydon, making it more difficult to access files and pushing up overhead costs, will the Secretary of State reconfirm that there is no planned closure of the court?
Asked by
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 January 2008
Reference
471 c162-3
House
House of Commons

On clarity, does my hon. Friend agree that it would be important to know what the estates strategy means when it talks about Sutton court being an ““opportunity””?

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c276WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend the Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Tom Brake) for applying for and securing a debate on this subject today. I am also grateful to the Minister for giving me the opportunity to contribute briefly to it. As my hon. Friend rightly says, when...

Member
Paul Burstow (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c275-6WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington (Tom Brake) on securing the debate; perhaps I should congratulate the double act that is now in place, because he and the hon. Member for Sutton and Cheam (Mr. Burstow) are each sharing one another’s concerns, as they did a few...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c276-8WH
House
House of Commons

Yes, there is a lovely euphemism in the business plan; it talks of ““integration opportunities””. I call them mergers and closures. That is what we are talking about. It is an opportunity to close a courthouse, realise an asset and reinvest it elsewhere in the business activities of Her Majesty’s...

Member
Paul Burstow (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c276WH
House
House of Commons

I welcome the opportunity for this timely debate. I am aware that my hon. Friend the Member for Sutton and Cheam (Mr. Burstow) wishes to make a brief contribution to the debate.

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c273WH
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Mr. Marshall, for that intervention. I hope that the Minister will be receptive to the idea that my hon. Friend will share my time in this debate. I think that she has nodded her assent to that proposal. This is not our first debate on Sutton magistrates court....

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c273-5WH
House
House of Commons

Yes. I know the area very well and I understand the hon. Gentleman’s point. There is already a precedent for joint working between courts in south-east London. For example, Camberwell has a satellite court at London Bridge, and Greenwich and Woolwich magistrates courts work co-operatively together, which has proved to...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c278WH
House
House of Commons

Would it be possible, after the debate, to obtain access to information about any modelling that has been done of the cluster idea in terms of its effect on the use of the three courts’ capacity and what it might mean for our constituents in terms of their travelling and...

Member
Paul Burstow (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c278WH
House
House of Commons

While that is true, in fact transport connections from the London borough of Sutton are via West Croydon, but the main interchange is East Croydon, so transport access is not straightforward.

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c278WH
House
House of Commons

During the formal consultation phase of the proposals, would it be possible for the Minister or her colleague the Minister of State to meet me and my hon. Friend and representatives of the London borough of Sutton to discuss our concerns in a little more detail? Obviously, at that point...

Member
Paul Burstow (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c279WH
House
House of Commons

I shall come to the definition of opportunity, but it means that there are likely to be different opportunities for continued usage in future. However, that does not necessarily mean closure. It could mean a court being used for a batch of similar cases that could be dealt with more...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c279WH
House
House of Commons

We referred earlier to the fact that Sutton is an opportunity court. The comments on other opportunity courts state that Ilford, for example, has the potential to relocate. Could the Minister try to ascertain from the relevant Department precisely the way in which Sutton constitutes an opportunity?

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c278WH
House
House of Commons

I will certainly try to ensure that if such information is available it is provided to the hon. Gentleman and the hon. Member for Carshalton and Wallington.

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c278WH
House
House of Commons

I shall have to write to the hon. Gentleman about the bench legal manager. There will be local centralisation of administrative functions, but I shall have to take advice on whether that means only one legal manager. I will return to the hon. Gentleman on that. I hope that I...

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c280WH
House
House of Commons

I thought that the Minister was about to conclude. Will she respond on the bench legal manager issue, if not now then at least in writing? That is clearly an issue that JPs are most concerned about. I thought from her response that she was saying that there would be...

Member
Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c280WH
House
House of Commons

I do not want to commit my right hon. and learned Friend to meetings without having a word with her, but I will certainly put it to her. She is generally very open to meetings with colleagues and, if her diary permits, I am sure that she will allow that....

Member
Bridget Prentice (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c279-80WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on Sutton Magistrates Court

Lead member
Tom Brake
Answering member
Bridget Prentice
Department
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
5 July 2006
Reference
448 c273-80WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on Sutton Courthouse.

Lead member
Paul Burstow
Answering member
Yvette Cooper
Department
Lord Chancellor's Department
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
14 May 2003
Reference
405 c123-30WH
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 01.04.2003 from Tony Blair PM to Tom Brake MP regarding the closure of Sutton Magistrates' Court. Prime Minister. 2003.

Deposited by
Prime Minister
Type
Deposited papers
Date
2 April 2003
Reference
HINF 2003/851
House
House of Commons