Skip to main content

1-20 of 488 results for subject:"Personal income"

Subject X
Pension funds

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Pension funds (488)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Committee stage. Clause 1, amendment 5 negatived on division (191 to 326). Clauses 1 to 3 agreed to. New clause 5 negatived on division (195 to 317). Bill reported without amendment. Third reading. Agreed to on division (316 to 194). Bill passed.

Lead member
Torsten Bell
Answering member
Mark Garnier
Department
Treasury
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HC); Debates on bills
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 cc355-432
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 5, page 1, line 10, after “income tax” insert—

“at the higher or additional rate”.

This amendment would exempt basic rate taxpayers in England, Wales and Scotland from the £2,000 cap.

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c355
House
House of Commons

It is a great pleasure to be with you yet again, Ms Nokes. I enjoyed our last sparring with the Pensions Minister just before Christmas, which cheered us up to no end.

Let me speak to amendments 5, 7, 6 and 8 as well as new clause 4, which all stand...

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 cc357-9
House
House of Commons

I commend the shadow Minister for what he is saying. This is about not just those on lower incomes, but those on middle incomes. It is about the mums and dads of the students—all this falls back on their shoulders. Does he agree that this Bill is an attack on...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c359
House
House of Commons

I completely agree. That is a fundamental problem. We are doing completely the wrong thing for people who want to do the right thing. We are disincentivising people taking responsibility for their future at a time when the state pension is coming under a lot of pressure. It is expected...

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c359
House
House of Commons

You have years to go.

Member
Torsten Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c359
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister very much.

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c359
House
House of Commons

Will the shadow Minister give way?

Member
Chris Vince (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c359
House
House of Commons

I am trying to finish my speech—in fact, I had finished my speech.

This is a very important point, and we will push amendment 5 to a vote. As I said, we will challenge Labour MPs not to do the wrong thing for their constituents—for the young, hard-working graduates who are...

Member
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 cc359-360
House
House of Commons

My chief concern with this Bill is that, like a lot of the measures that the Chancellor announced in the Budget, it looks like it may be a route to some medium-term increased tax revenues, but it gives no thought to longer-term consequences. That will help the Chancellor meet her...

Member
Charlie Maynard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c360
House
House of Commons

The shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Wyre Forest (Mark Garnier), challenged Labour MPs to champion their constituencies. One of the biggest concerns I have about pensions in my constituency of Harlow is the number of people who are not paying into any pension at all, particularly those who are...

Member
Chris Vince (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c361
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree—well said.

The Government may well say that the Bill will not affect low earners, who are likely not to be saving £2,000 in a given year, as the hon. Member for Harlow (Chris Vince) has just said. However, that is too simplistic a way to look at this...

Member
Charlie Maynard (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c361
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Wyre Forest (Mark Garnier) for the reminder of the excellent debate we had before the Christmas break. I thank him and the hon. Member for Witney (Charlie Maynard) for their contributions. I will briefly reiterate the case for the three short and perfectly formed...

Member
Torsten Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c362
House
House of Commons

The Minister will recall our many happy hours together in Committee on the Pension Schemes Bill. One of the issues that the Liberal Democrats raised was the need for an MOT for people as they approach pension age, to see how their pension is going and test its adequacy. Does...

Member
Steve Darling (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c362
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Ms Nokes. I will follow your advice, but will try to respond to some of the hon. Member’s points when I address the question of how we have gone about making the changes that this Bill introduces.

As I have said, change is inevitable, but it is important to...

Member
Torsten Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c362
House
House of Commons

The Minister has said that the cost to the Exchequer of the salary sacrifice scheme is going to triple by the end of this decade. Does he agree that that is unsustainable for the Treasury, and also that we in this Chamber have to get real? The reason why people...

Member
Chris Vince (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c362
House
House of Commons

In a shock move, I entirely agree with my hon. Friend. Members of those parties who have said that they intend to vote against this Bill today cannot keep coming to this Chamber, day after day, calling for additional spending in more areas, while opposing any means of raising taxes....

Member
Torsten Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c362
House
House of Commons

No, I will not mention the welfare budget.

Member
Torsten Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c363
House
House of Commons

I am listening to every word of your strictures, Ms Nokes. This Bill is also pragmatic by providing time to adjust and by ensuring that saving into a pension remains hugely tax-advantaged. I say gently to Members who do not agree with the detail of this Bill that they should...

Member
Torsten Bell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c363
House
House of Commons

Can the Minister explain what is pragmatic about withdrawing a 2p in the pound tax relief from a higher rate taxpayer without a student loan, while withdrawing a 17p in the pound tax relief from a basic rate taxpayer who happens to have a student loan?

Member
Ashley Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2026
Reference
779 c363
House
House of Commons