Skip to main content

1-20 of 41 results for member:"Patsy Calton"

Subject X
Railways

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Railways (41)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That this House notes the comments made by the Transport Secretary to BBC News on Monday 22nd November implying that rural rail services were in the business of carting fresh air around the country; believes that this constitutes a potentially serious threat to the long-term future of rural rail services;...

Primary sponsor
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
1 December 2004
Reference
268
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much has been spent on the development of the Global System for Mobile Communications for Railways in each of the last seven years; and what the estimated cost is for each of the next five years; what the total cost of...

Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 July 2004
Reference
424 c665W; 184437;184438;184439;184440
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on the train control system masts on the west coast main line. - Inc figure. (Letter in Library Dep 04/1425).
Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
22 June 2004
Reference
422 c1170
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps are being taken to reduce costs within the railway industry.
Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
22 June 2004
Reference
422 c1170; 179614
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that it is one year since the Secretary of State for Transport asked the Strategic Rail Authority and the industry to work together to develop a national discount rail card; and that, a year on, this House and the travelling public are still waiting for the...

Primary sponsor
John Austin (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
16 June 2004
Reference
1358
House
House of Commons

That this House is alarmed about reports that the Home Office is proposing to remove from train drivers involved in witnessing suicides and/or trespass deaths, their right to claim compensation under the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme; believes such a move to be wrong and misguided as it flies in the...

Primary sponsor
Alan Meale (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
9 June 2004
Reference
1329
House
House of Commons

That this House notes that Jarvis has accepted liability for the Potters Bar derailment and supports the request of the families involved for a full public enquiry into the tragedy; is concerned that Jarvis is still responsible for over 50 per cent. of renewals on the national rail network and...

Primary sponsor
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
29 April 2004
Reference
1102
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the recent statement from the Secretary of State for Transport in which he indicated that he was considering devolving some key rail investment decisions to passenger transport executives in the English regions; expresses its concern about the current investment programme of the Strategic Rail Authority which...

Primary sponsor
Graham Stringer (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
19 April 2004
Reference
982
House
House of Commons

That this House commends the disability charity, Leonard Cheshire, for the success of its All Aboard campaign; notes the strength of feelings amongst the disability movement in support of an early end date for inaccessible trains and widespread opposition to an end date of 2035; and therefore urges the Government...

Primary sponsor
Mark Lazarowicz (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Early day motions
Date
22 March 2004
Reference
876
House
House of Commons

To ask the Deputy Prime Minister, what additional consultation is required before progress can be made with the recommendations of the Permitted Development Order Review England, with respect to railway undertakings and telecommunications masts.

Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Office of the Deputy Prime Minister
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 January 2004
Reference
417 c308W; 151000
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how much has been spent on (a) maintenance and (b) upgrade of the West Coast Main Line in each year since 1997; and what the purpose of the expenditure was in each case.

Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 January 2004
Reference
146570; 416 c554W;416 c553W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what steps are being taken to reduce the number and seriousness of incidents of motor vehicles striking railway bridges.

Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 January 2004
Reference
146220; 416 c432W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what plans he has to oblige franchised train operators to provide toilet facilities (a) on trains and (b) in stations.

Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 December 2003
Reference
141526; 415 c54W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what progress is being made towards reducing the train journey time between London and Manchester; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2003
Reference
134556; 413 c930W;413 c927W
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes Network Rail's decision to bring all infrastructure maintenance contracts in-house, ending the practice of contracting this work to outside parties; believes bringing railway maintenance in-house will help control costs, improve safety standards and performance; notes that, for the first time since privatisation the railway network will...

Primary sponsor
Lawrie Quinn (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
27 October 2003
Reference
1808; 1808A1
House
House of Commons

Supplementary business question on the safety of new railway track laid between Cheadle Hulme and Stockport.

Member
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Business questions
Date
23 October 2003
Reference
411 c797-8
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on rail services and stations in the North West, particularly the need for a railway station in Cheadle.
Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2003
Reference
411 c497
House
House of Commons

That this House welcomes the decision by Network Rail to take over Jarvis rail maintenance contracts; notes that 40 per cent. of rail maintenance will now be under the control of Network Rail; believes bringing railway maintenance in-house will help control costs, improve the standards of safety and reduce the...

Primary sponsor
John McDonnell (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
14 October 2003
Reference
1738
House
House of Commons

That this House notes the intention of Network Rail to continue their introduction of telecommunications masts up to 33 metres in height and requests that the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister makes clear his intention that rail undertakings will be required to seek full planning permission for masts on...

Primary sponsor
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
8 September 2003
Reference
1638
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many rail signalling masts of 15 metres and over are planned by Network Rail in each region. - Including ref to 19 May 2003, 405 c545-6W.

Asked by
Patsy Calton (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 June 2003
Reference
121832; 408 c4-5W
House
House of Commons