Skip to main content

1-20 of 116 results for subject:"Local development frameworks"

Subject X
Greenfield sites

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Greenfield sites (116)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the Government's consultation paper on proposed changes to the planning system. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Rooker
Answering member
Baroness Hanham
Department
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1835-70
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in contemplating the consultation document on planning reform published by the Government, I start by saying that in principle, and in general, I am actually with the Government on this issue, although I may differ on a few points—the two most important being brownfield and on how local...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1835-40
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must begin, as did my noble friend Lord Greaves, by declaring an interest as a councillor on a local planning authority. However, unlike my noble friend, I have managed to spend 37 years as a councillor without ever serving on a development control committee, except perhaps for...

Member
Lord Tope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1856-9
House
House of Lords

To call attention to the Government’s consultation paper on proposed changes to the planning system; and to move for papers. To call attention to the Government’s consultation paper on proposed changes to the planning system; and to move for papers.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1835
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest in that I am a member of a local planning authority and the local development control committee in Colne, which is the Colne and District Committee. Perhaps I should think about retiring. I sometimes complain that your Lordships’ House does not spend enough time...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1845-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Rooker for introducing this debate and for enabling us to make representations direct to the Minister without having to fill in a consultation form. It is not surprising that the draft national policy framework has caused controversy. Planning decisions necessarily involve balancing...

Member
Lord Hart of Chilton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1842-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, there are a great many planning experts in this House, many of whom demonstrated their great skills and experience during proceedings on the Localism Bill over many days. Many of its amendments and debates focus on areas that are closely related to the current consultation on the national...

Member
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1840-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am most grateful to everybody who has participated in this debate. The message is one of a revising Chamber; the expertise that you would not have in the other place has been on display here today among everyone, and in particular in the noble Lord, Lord Rogers,...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour Independent)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1870
House
House of Lords

I am always in trouble on this—the debate on 27 October also will produce extra thoughts. I am encouraged by the comprehensive nature of the points brought forward today. However, I shall inevitably not be categorical in responding to any of the points raised today as this is still the...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1866-70
House
House of Lords

I am not sure I said there was no need for housing development. I said I felt there was an almost infinite demand and that to try to meet that substantial demand was probably optimistic.

Member
Viscount Goschen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1865
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not know whether I am the first to do so, but I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Stowell, on her appointment and welcome her to the Front Bench. I should also like to congratulate, as other noble Lords have done, the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, who...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1863-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a fantastic and fascinating debate. There is always a depth of experience and wisdom around this House that very many people in other places will be jealous of. We pull together so much here that perhaps simply gets diffused elsewhere. I am enormously grateful to...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1866
House
House of Lords

That is possibly right, which is why I want to refer to need as the basis of a housing programme. There is also the question of the duty to co-operate, which some of your Lordships have mentioned, and which I entirely endorse. However, there is no actual mechanism, either in...

Member
Lord Beecham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1865-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Draft National Planning Policy Framework is well on the way to becoming a sensible and civilised policy document. It secures a strong role for planning within the new localism. In the future that it envisages—provided local planning authorities have plans, local development frameworks, and provided those plans...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1853-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I had not intended to take part in this debate, but I have been so impressed by the quality of the debate introduced by my noble friend Lord Rooker that I want to make one or two comments in this reunion of Planning Ministers. When we first came...

Member
Lord King of Bridgwater (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1862-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Rooker for having created the opportunity for this debate. As noble Lords can imagine, as a planning Minister he was a rather difficult act to follow. For a long time, people were obviously disappointed that I was not my noble...

Member
Baroness Andrews (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1859-62
House
House of Lords

My Lords, while respecting what planning has achieved over the last 50 years, there is no doubt that it can still be improved: to encourage local people to get involved in the decisions that affect their lives; to reduce delays; and, indeed, to deliver the sustainable development that we all...

Member
Baroness Parminter (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1851-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a timely debate on one of the most contentious issues of the moment, and I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, for introducing it and doing so in an absolutely excellent speech. It is appropriate that this Motion should be introduced from the Benches...

Member
Lord Reay (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1847-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest in Rogers Stirk Harbour and Partners and as a director of the River Café, Hammersmith. I join in congratulating my noble friend Lord Rooker on introducing this timely debate. I will discuss the effect that this national planning policy framework is likely to have...

Member
Lord Rogers of Riverside (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2011
Reference
730 c1849-51
House
House of Lords

The Minister is being characteristically generous in giving way again. Notwithstanding PPS3 guidance, does he not acknowledge that many councils, including Castle Point, have given away far too many gardens in the dash for flats? We are seeing massive flat developments being built without any garden space at all, but...

Member
Bob Spink (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2008
Reference
483 c529
House
House of Commons