Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour Independent) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 13 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on Planning.
Planning
My Lords, I am most grateful to everybody who has participated in this debate. The message is one of a revising Chamber; the expertise that you would not have in the other place has been on display here today among everyone, and in particular in the noble Lord, Lord Rogers, with his massive experience around the world as well as in this country, in chairing the Urban Task Force. I am incredibly grateful. There are two conclusions: one, that the countryside is not under threat and, two, that virtually everybody without exception has taken up the issue of brownfield. It is not mentioned in the document. The abolition of brownfield-first is referred to in the impact assessment; that is where the danger is. But by definition, adopting the brownfield first, without being too rigid, is a lifeboat for the Government and for the policy, because it actually assists in developing cities and in the arguments with those who claim that the countryside is being concreted over. It is not going to be. Motion withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 730 c1870
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Construction Brownfield sites Housing Green belt Planning permission Sustainable development Rural areas Greenfield sites Local development frameworks
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 13:34:16 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_773151
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_773151
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_773151