Skip to main content

1-20 of 197 results for subject:Archaeology

Subject X
Waste management

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Waste management (197)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

The noble Earl has raised a very important question. Perhaps I may respond, first, to the question of the IPC and the MMO. We have debated this matter on a number of occasions with regard to this Bill, and I remind noble Lords that we also had extensive debate on...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c633-4
House
House of Lords

Before my noble friend responds, perhaps the Minister will clarify what he said. Although the IPC and DECC will, as I understand it, seek or take guidance from the MMO, they will ultimately make their own judgments. But what will happen when these judgments do not coincide? On the face...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c634-5
House
House of Lords

On oil and gas, it will be the Department of Energy and Climate Change, and on matters that fall to the Infrastructure Planning Commission, it will be the IPC. They will of course be advised by the MMO. Our intention is to ensure consistency. Previous amendments would essentially have given...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c635
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his reply and especially for restating the Government’s position on the IPC. One of our arguments in moving the amendments on the IPC was that the Planning Act ought to be amended. The Minister said that we could not possibly amend that Act because it...

Member
Earl Cathcart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c635
House
House of Lords

Clause 66: Determination of applications Amendment A1 A1: Clause 66, page 37, line 33, at end insert ", including social or economic consequences"

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c620
House
House of Lords

I turn to the question raised by the noble Lord, Lord Taylor. His amendment would introduce a requirement on the licensing authority to consult transport infrastructure providers that may be affected by a marine licence application He mentioned Network Rail in particular. We have already talked in previous debates about...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c621
House
House of Lords

I thank those who have renumbered these amendments. Although it has resulted in us having to renavigate our way through the Bill, at least we have clear beacons by which we can see our way through to, I hope, concluding this Committee stage in the not-too-distant future. We are on...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c620-1
House
House of Lords

I want to raise one more point on Amendment A10. The Minister will recall that, on the issue of planning, we discussed the Bristol Channel and he said that we could not resolve it in any other way because it was a devolved matter. Amendment A10 refers to the appropriate...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c622
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may address Amendment A10—I think we have all found the renumbering of amendments slightly confusing and I apologise if the Minister anticipated that I would want to speak at some length on this issue. I thought that we had touched on it so extensively in previous sessions in...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c621-2
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord has made a very important point. I have already said to the noble Lord, Lord Tyler, that I would like to take the opportunity to write to him in more detail about how we see the approach to the issue of wrecks. In doing so, I shall...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c647
House
House of Lords

Will the Minister address the amendments to Clause 112 in this group, which are Amendments A110 to A112? They are consequential and in no way differ from the general thrust of the amendments on which he has given a fuller explanation. I am particularly concerned about Clause 112(2). It picks...

Member
Lord Tyler (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c645
House
House of Lords

I can certainly undertake to do that and ensure that Members of the Committee are suitably informed.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c641
House
House of Lords

I do not think that this is tangential at all and I gave the example of Ilfracombe for a purpose. The development that it is considering has a lot to do with energy generation because it might look at combining that with the harbour development. Far from being tangential, it...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c641
House
House of Lords

I would join the noble Earl in saying that I was out of my depth if I were not dealing, on the whole, with inshore waters. Therefore, we are not as far out of our depth as we are with other parts of the Bill, which go further out to...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c640
House
House of Lords

Amendment A39 A39: Clause 83, page 49, line 19, leave out "defendant or a person acting under the defendant’s" and insert "person or of some other person acting under the person’s" Amendment A39 agreed. Clause 83, as amended, agreed. Amendment 40 not moved.

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c651
House
House of Lords

Clause 87: Compliance notice Amendments A44 to A47 A44: Clause 87, page 51, line 4, leave out "the appropriate" and insert "an" A45: Clause 87, page 51, line 16, at beginning insert "serious" A46: Clause 87, page 51, line 17, at beginning insert "serious" A47: Clause 87, page 51, line...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c652
House
House of Lords

I tabled my opposition to Clauses 88 and 103 standing part of the Bill in order to ask some probing questions about the concept of remediation notices. I know that the Minister has already moved government Amendments 48 to 51 to Clause 88, but the clause is rather light on...

Member
Earl Cathcart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c652-3
House
House of Lords

I take comfort from what the Minister has said, particularly with regard to Amendment A40. On Amendment A38, what would be the position if a ship carrying drums of chemicals on deck caught fire and, in order to prevent that fire spreading to the rest of the ship, they were...

Member
Lord Greenway (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c651
House
House of Lords

In that case, the defendant would establish that the jettisoning had taken place to secure the safety of the vessel, which is a defence within the framework of the Bill. I think that that issue would be covered.

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c651
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that explanation. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment A38 withdrawn.

Member
Lord Greenway (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c651
House
House of Lords