Skip to main content

1-100 of 4,193 results for subject:Dissolution

Type

+ Legislation (12) + Acts (2)
-
Public acts (2)
+ Bills (9) + Public bills (9)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (7)
-
Ballot bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (2)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (3)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (1)
-
Statutory instruments (1)
+ Members' contributions (4,044)
-
Business questions (34)
-
Maiden speeches (28)
-
Oral answers to questions (20)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Points of order (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,998)
-
Speaker's rulings (4)
+ Parliamentary committees (25) + Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
-
Select Committee reports (9)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (4)
-
Select Committee written evidence (1)
+ Parliamentary papers (36)
-
Command papers (6)
-
Consultation papers (1)
-
Deposited papers (17)
-
House of Commons papers (8)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (55) + Debates (36)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (12)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (6)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (1)
+ Legislative debates (28)
-
Debates on bills (27)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (1)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
+ Statements (16) + Oral statements (12)
-
Business statements (5)
-
Ministerial statements (6)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (4)
+ Parliamentary questions (73)
-
Business questions (34)
+ Oral questions (21)
-
Prime Minister's questions (4)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (18)
+ Research briefings (29) + Commons Briefing papers (18)
-
Briefing papers on bills (2)
-
Commons Debate packs (5)
+ Lords In Focus (2)
-
Lords In Focus - House of Lords (2)
+ Lords Library Briefings (4)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (2)
-
Lords Library Briefings - House of Lords (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

A briefing paper on the office and functions of the Prime Minister

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
CBP-9880

A list of all UK General elections dates since 1832.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
SN04512

Election rules include a timetable that must be followed. This briefing explains what is in the timetables and how long they run.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
15 July 2026
Reference
CBP-10301

Public resources cannot be used for party political campaigning at any time. At elections ministers will normally observe discretion over announcements or decisions that could influence voters.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
SN05262

Polling day for UK elections is usually Thursday and cannot be held at a weekend. Weekend voting pilots are being held in four areas in local elections in May 2026.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
3 March 2026
Reference
SN04469

The UK Government has authorised pilot schemes to take place at local elections in England in May 2026. These will test new ways of polling station voting.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
2 March 2026
Reference
CBP-10466

There will be a Westminster Hall debate on 2 March 2026 on an e-petition calling for members of the public to be given the right to vote no confidence in the government. The debate will be opened by John Lamont MP. The Petitions Committee agreed to the debate in response...

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
23 February 2026
Reference
CDP-2026-0038

There will be a Westminster Hall debate on 12 January 2026 on an e-petition calling for a new general election. The debate will be opened by John Lamont MP. The Petitions Committee agreed to the debate in response to e-petition 727309 that attracted over 1 million signatures.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
2 January 2026
Reference
CDP-2025-0251

A research briefing examining recent developments in relation to the law concerning the dissolution of Parliament

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
21 May 2025
Reference
CBP-10095

There will be a Westminster Hall debate on 6 January 2025 on an e-petition calling for a new general election. The debate will be opened by Jamie Stone MP. The Petitions Committee agreed to the debate in response to e-petition 700143 that attracted over 2.9 million signatures.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
17 December 2024
Reference
CDP-2024-0177

A general election will take place on 4 July 2024. Before Parliament dissolves, a short 'wash-up period' allows the government to pass some legislation that is still in progress, subject to agreements with the opposition.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
23 May 2024
Reference
SN05398

With permission, I will make a short business statement.

Following the announcement by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister, I am sure the House will understand that discussions continue on the business ahead of the Dissolution of this Parliament. With that in mind, tomorrow’s business will include consideration of a...

Member
Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
750 c991
House
House of Commons

I thank the Leader of the House for that emergency business statement—I think many across the country will thank her too, although I am not sure many on the Government Benches will—that Parliament will be dissolved for a general election. The country has been crying out for change, and this...

Member
Lucy Powell (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Business questions
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
750 c991
House
House of Commons

As the shadow Leader of the House will know, discussions are ongoing through the usual channels. I thank her for her offer of help on these important Bills. Certainly, we would like our legislative programme to get through and if the Opposition were minded to assist us on those important...

Member
Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
750 cc991-2
House
House of Commons

Other than providing time for the Tobacco and Vapes Bill—she knows that matters greatly to me and that there is widespread support for it across the House, including from both Front Benches—does the Leader of the House plan to allow time for Members who are retiring from the House to...

Member
Steve Brine (Conservative)
Type
Business questions
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
750 c992
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for raising that matter as it will be a concern to many Members on all sides of the House. The usual channels are aware of hon. Members’ wish to do that and I hope to be able to update the House tomorrow.

Member
Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
750 c992
House
House of Commons

Announcement of the change in the Business of the House on 23 and 24 May 2024 ahead of Dissolution following an announcement of a General Election on 4th July 2024.

Lead member
Penny Mordaunt
Answering member
Lucy Powell
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Business statements
Date
22 May 2024
Reference
750 cc991-3
House
House of Commons

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Roborough
Answering member
Lord Livermore
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
20 May 2024
Reference
838 cc144-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this SI forms part of the Government’s ambitious programme to deliver a smarter regulatory framework for financial services and to replace areas of assimilated law, formerly known as retained EU law, in financial services with an approach to regulation that is tailored to the UK. That includes the...

Member
Lord Roborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2024
Reference
838 cc145-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we welcome this SI and will support it today. Its provisions are clearly necessary and are mostly explained clearly in the accompanying documentation. I would be grateful, however, if the Minister could say a few words about commencement and address a few questions.

Two provisions seem to come into...

Member
Lord Sharkey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2024
Reference
838 cc146-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for introducing this SI and setting out its purpose. I welcome him to his place.

As the noble Lord noted in his opening remarks, this statutory instrument forms part of a wider programme to deliver a smarter regulatory framework for financial services....

Member
Lord Livermore (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2024
Reference
838 c147GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful for the contributions to this short debate. I will try to answer some of the detailed questions that were asked as well as I can but I will have to write on some of them, I am afraid.

Let me first respond to some of the...

Member
Lord Roborough (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 May 2024
Reference
838 cc147-8GC
House
House of Lords

There will be an e-petition debate relating to the next general election. This debate will take place in Westminster Hall on 29 January 2024. the subject for this debate was determined by the Petitions Committee. The debate will be opened by Tonia Antoniazzi, on behalf of the Petitions Committee.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
26 January 2024
Reference
CDP-2024-0013

A general election must be called at some time in 2024 and the latest date an election can be held is 28 January 2025

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
5 January 2024
Reference
CBP-9921
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Administration Committee
Date
5 June 2023
Reference
HC 1454 2022-23
House
House of Commons

Unless a Parliament runs for a full five years, the King may dissolve Parliament before the expiry of its maximum term. By convention, the King exercises those powers only following a request by the Prime Minister.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
20 April 2023
Reference
SN05085
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Administration Committee
Date
6 February 2023
Reference
HC 209 2022-23
House
House of Commons

A debate has been scheduled in Westminster Hall at 4.30pm on Monday 17 October on e-petition 619781, calling for an early general election. The subject for the debate has been nominated by the Petitions Committee.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
17 October 2022
Reference
CDP-2022-0167

The Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Act 2022 received Royal Assent on 24 March 2022. The Prime Minister is now able to request a dissolution at the time of their choosing.

Type
Briefing papers on bills
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
CBP-9308
Type
Public acts
Date
24 March 2022
Reference
2022 c. 11; CHAP 11 2022

This briefing paper sets out the elections that are scheduled for 2022 and future years up until 2026.The elections covered include General Elections to the House of Commons, for devolved legislatures (Senedd Cymru/Welsh Parliament, Scottish Parliament, Northern Ireland Assembly), London Assembly and Mayor of London, local authorities (in England, Wales,...

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
23 March 2022
Reference
CBP-9404

Moved by

Lord True

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c855
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the leave of the House, I will briefly remind your Lordships of where we find ourselves. Your Lordships’ House amended the Bill, which had been passed by the other place, to give the Commons the right to a veto on dissolution and invited the other place to...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c856
House
House of Lords

My Lords, after a short debate in the other place, the amendment proposed by this House was disagreed, and here we are today. There is still an issue: we believe the Dissolution of Parliament should not be based on the revival of the prerogative, but the other place takes a...

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc856-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope we are all agreed that we should not insist on the amendment that we passed on the previous occasion. However, we were right to ask the other place to think again. Indeed, even though it was a relatively short debate, and programmed as such, it was...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c857
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we should not let this moment pass without reminding ourselves of precisely what a bizarre set of circumstances we find ourselves in. I remind the House that the Lords amendment that we sent to the Commons says:

“The powers referred to in subsection (1)”

—that is, the power to dissolve...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc857-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have mixed feelings on this occasion. As the House may remember from my remarks on Report, I always thought that our amendment to the Bill that we passed back to the Commons was a second best. I also regret, as the noble Lord has just said, that...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c858
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fear that if we had removed Clause 3, although I was very sympathetic to that line of argument, as the noble Lord knows, we

would have had the same result. The Commons, whipped, would have sent back the Bill with Clause 3 reinserted. We should not delude...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc858-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I echo the sentiments of the noble Lord, Lord Grocott. This is a bizarre situation, in that we said to the House of Commons, “We think, O House of Commons, that you ought to have a bit more power on one of the most important acts of the...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c859
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we laugh, and in some ways, it is amusing. It is also extraordinary—I am not sure that it is amusing. The Fixed-term Parliaments Act was an Act of its time whose main purpose was to protect the coalition Government, and it succeeded in that to a degree. I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc859-860
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords who have spoken. I say to the noble Baroness that this Bill did receive detailed pre-legislative scrutiny; it was considered by a Joint Committee of both Houses and Ministers were scrutinised by committees in both Houses. Ministers in both Houses—I have had some...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c860
House
House of Lords

Just to help the Minister, that is exactly the point I was making about the Fixed-term Parliaments Act not having proper scrutiny and getting us into the position we are in now.

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 c860
House
House of Lords

I was agreeing with the noble Baroness on that. The Fixed-term Parliaments Act was an aberration from 2011 to 2022. Some noble Lords have expressed shock that the House of Commons would wish to return to an arrangement which endured for generations. I do not share that shock.

The noble Lord,...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc860-1
House
House of Lords

Lords consideration of Commons reason for disagreeing to a Lords amendment. The Lords amendment not insisted on and the Commons reason agreed to.

Lead member
Lord True
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 March 2022
Reference
820 cc855-861
House
House of Lords

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 1.

The Bill passed through the other place, where it was carefully scrutinised and amended in only one respect: to seek to retain a role for this honourable House in respect of Dissolution. The Lords amendment provided that the Prime...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

I am hugely relieved to hear the Minister say that. I have stood in every election since 1997. Only when we saw the chaos caused by a Government who did not want to continue and an Opposition who did not want the chance to face an election could we see...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

I agree with my right hon. Friend; there is of course a good reason why the 2017 to 2019 Parliament is referred to as the zombie Parliament.

I remind the House of the commitments that both parties made in 2019. The Conservatives committed to repealing the Fixed-term Parliaments Act.

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister confirm that, if we dismiss Lords amendment 1 today, the courts will not have a role in fixing the dates for elections, because, surely, that is matter for us, answerable to the electors?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c642
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is quite right that it is not productive, and, in fact, it would not be in the interests of the judiciary themselves, for the courts to have such a role.

We committed to repealing the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, as it had led to paralysis at a time...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc642-3
House
House of Commons

The right hon. and learned Gentleman has mentioned what happens in the event of a minority Government. What would happen where the Prime Minister of a minority Government wished to call a general election, but there was the possibility of an alternative Government being formed? Would that Prime Minister be...

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

I do not want to get into hypotheticals, but what I will say is that the pre-2011 position worked extremely well. There is a reason why it worked well and it was proven to have functioned correctly. We seek to go back to a proven, tried and tested system, which...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

Does my right hon. and learned Friend share my disbelief at some of the opposition to the current position, especially as we recall the chaos that led to the last general election and the frustration among the public when Parliament, in many people’s eyes, seemed to lose the respect of...

Member
Alun Cairns (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

Good constitutional practice involves protecting the integrity of the legislature, the Executive and the judiciary and, in our view, the proposals do that and this amendment would not, so I agree with what my right hon. Friend says.

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

I sat on the Joint Committee that reviewed the 2011 Act and we spent long, productive and interesting hours looking at it. Does my right hon. and learned Friend agree that it is really unproductive to look at our future arrangements in the context of what happened in 2019, just...

Member
Jackie Doyle-Price (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c643
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is completely right. In fact, it is difficult to expostulate all the different scenarios that may occur in future, so it is best to avoid that, but we know what worked well—the status quo ante the 2011 Act.

As I say, we have experienced the consequences of a...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc643-4
House
House of Commons

The Minister responded to the hon. Member for Thurrock (Jackie Doyle-Price) by saying that he fully agreed with her excellent statement, but he is in essence doing the exact opposite. Why this paradoxical situation?

Member
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c644
House
House of Commons

I am obviously not doing that. We are able to see where mistakes have been made and where things have gone well in the past, and we see that in the pre-2011 position—the position we are seeking to achieve and that Labour sought to achieve in its manifesto, as did...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c644
House
House of Commons

May I refer my right hon. and learned Friend to “The Crown”, of which I am sure he was an avid viewer? In answer to the intervention by the hon. Member for Cardiff West (Kevin Brennan), is my right hon. and learned Friend familiar with the Lascelles principles, as written...

Member
William Wragg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c644
House
House of Commons

The Lascelles principles are something we still respect. One of the fundamental tenets of Sir Alan Lascelles’ letter was the fact that we wished to avoid any suggestion that the sovereign be involved in politics.

The amendment, as I was saying, is silent on the issue of the negative consequences. The...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc644-5
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the opportunity to speak for the Opposition in this debate.

I listened very carefully to the case that the Minister made for his motion to remove Lords amendment 1 to clause 2. I was sad to hear it, and I think we could do better. He is...

Member
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc645-6
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend think there is any possibility that a future Government, or this Government given their past record, might abuse the power to dissolve Parliament in the way that they abused the power to prorogue Parliament during that period through a disgraceful hoodwinking of Her Majesty the Queen?

Member
Lord Brennan of Canton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c646
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for that intervention. I strongly believe in the maxim that how you do one thing is how you do everything, and I believe that the same cast of characters will broadly act in the same way at every opportunity. That tends to be, as with all the...

Member
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c646
House
House of Commons

How is it an abuse of power and a strengthening of the Executive for the Executive to say, “We want to go to the people and let the people decide whether we should be allowed to continue in government or be chucked out”?

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c646
House
House of Commons

The Lords amendment is a very modest safeguard to that in saying, “At least demonstrate that a majority of the legislature agrees with you.” It is not unreasonable to say that Parliament could be involved in the Dissolution process in the way that noble Lords have said. It is a...

Member
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c646
House
House of Commons

I do not think it was a dreadful election—it was a brilliant election. What was dreadful was the fact that it was in the power of the Opposition to stop that election happening and to not allow the people to have their say.

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c646
House
House of Commons

I cannot agree with the right hon. Gentleman. The idea that it was dreadful that a Government who did not command a majority of this House could not just always get their way—that is how the system is supposed to work, I gently suggest.

Where a Government have a clear working...

Member
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c647
House
House of Commons

The point is this: why should an Opposition, when facing a minority Government who want to resolve things via an election, be able to stop an election? They either have to form a coalition of their majority and govern, which is one option, or allow the public to decide. It...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c647
House
House of Commons

I cannot agree with the right hon. Gentleman, because the reality is that before those parties could even come together to form that possible alternative Government, the Prime Minister could be in the car and on the way to call the election, and that process would be rendered moot. I...

Member
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c647
House
House of Commons

Many Members may find it rather difficult to think of a scenario when we would not need to have such a vote, but if other Members have watched “The Crown”, we have seen the example—a very fictitious one—where the scriptwriters wrote the moment when the then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher...

Member
Jackie Doyle-Price (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c647
House
House of Commons

It is definitely fair to say that there are new arrangements. That is why the Minister said the amendment would be inappropriate, but I do not think it would be. By the way, I have not seen “The Crown”; my wife and I are working our way through “Flip or...

Member
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc647-8
House
House of Commons

Sorry, Madam Deputy Speaker: 21 of the Minister’s colleagues. Of course, they were rare circumstances, but it has happened again in this Parliament that when the Government face opposition from outside, they seek to shut us out, and when they find opposition inside, they seek to lock yourselves out as...

Member
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c648
House
House of Commons

I apologise, Madam Deputy Speaker.

I say to the Government that it is not a one-way street and we think that having some checks and balances in our democracy is a good thing. In that spirit, I hope that hon. Members will vote in support of the Lords amendment.

Member
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c648
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Nottingham North (Alex Norris) for the introduction where he described me as being

cheeky faced. It will stun the Opposition and surprise the Government that I will be voting enthusiastically with the Government in the Lobby later, so clearly my re-education is having the...

Member
William Wragg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc648-9
House
House of Commons

Why is it good enough for the Scottish Parliament, Welsh Assembly and Northern Ireland Assembly to operate on fixed terms but not this place?

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c649
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman invites me to be intemperate about the difference between this House and the other Parliaments of the United Kingdom, which I will resist entirely. Places evolve through their own conventions and those Parliaments are doing exactly that. There is no need for universality; surely he would argue...

Member
William Wragg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc649-650
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak in favour of the Lords amendment, which would require any Government seeking to dissolve this House early and call a general election to first seek and receive the support of a simple majority of the Members of this House.

Last year, when the Bill was first introduced...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c650
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way, which is typically gracious of him. He calls it a “minimal check,” but the reality is that it is an absolute veto. If a Government do not have a majority in the House and if the Opposition sense that a Government might...

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c650
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for that intervention, but that is a decision for this Parliament to take. We are elected to take decisions, and to abdicate that responsibility to the Executive is a dangerous route to go down; we should not do that. He says that it is...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c650
House
House of Commons

What we are hearing, especially from Government Members, is continued Westminster exceptionalism: that this place, particularly the Executive,

once elected, knows what is best. That is why I raised the comparison with the devolved institutions, which operate to strict fixed terms. If they are to devolve early, that has to...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c650
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention, and he is right. What we are seeing is, as he describes it so eloquently, Westminster exceptionalism, because this does not go nearly far enough. It is the absolute minimum that one would expect.

As Tom Fleming of University College London and his...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c651
House
House of Commons

Can the hon. Member explain why Opposition parties in this House are so keen to prevent there being an early election? I thought Oppositions welcomed early elections.

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c651
House
House of Commons

It is very witty to frame this debate in those terms, but I think the right hon. Gentleman is missing the point. This is not about the power to hold a general election; this is about the power being ceded from this place to the Executive and what the Executive...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c651
House
House of Commons

Is it not strange that Conservative Members who we have had to listen to banging on and on for years about Parliament being sovereign and Parliament having control are now willing to cede that control to the Executive for cheap political gain?

Member
Alan Brown (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c651
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend, and I suspect he may have been reading my speech earlier, because I will come to that issue shortly.

This Government are determined that the Prime Minister, without consultation with or approval from this House and free of the threat of legal challenge, can call a...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc651-2
House
House of Commons

Opposition parties are struggling a bit with this idea of democracy, are they not? Taking back control was to have control by the people and for the people, and offering the people an early general election so that they could choose an effective Government when a Parliament was logjammed, hopeless...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc652-3
House
House of Commons

I apologise to the House that, because I have been in Committee Room 10 launching the call for evidence on setting up a national strategy for acquired brain injury, I am afraid I was not able to hear the wonderful speeches that doubtless came from those on the Front Bench—well,...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc653-4
House
House of Commons

Is it equally the case that including this vote in the Bill would not mitigate people not being good chaps? If a Prime Minister has a majority and they could get that vote through—who knows what their reasons are—when they see things coming over the horizon that might give them...

Member
Jackie Doyle-Price (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c654
House
House of Commons

I think the danger is precisely the opposite. The arrangements that the hon. Lady would like us to have are ones that put the monarch in a regular position of making a decision, and brings them closely into not only party politics, but sometimes into partisan politics within a political...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc654-5
House
House of Commons

I will be brief as I gather I have only a few minutes to speak. The Lords amendment would require the House of Commons to give prior approval to a dissolution of Parliament, and that would be done by simple majority rather than the two-thirds majority required by the Fixed...

Member
Gareth Bacon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc655-6
House
House of Commons

Members across the House want the repeal of the Fixed Term Parliaments Act 2011, but in its defence, it was a creature of its time and it delivered stable government for five years. Let us not reinvent history regarding why it was introduced in the first place. It disappoints me...

Member
Jackie Doyle-Price (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c656
House
House of Commons

It is not really for the Scottish National party to defend the Westminster interpretation of democracy, but the Bill, and rejecting the Lords amendment, is such a retrograde step that we must put that on the record and see it as part of a bigger picture. This is not control...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc656-7
House
House of Commons

First, may I say to my hon. Friend the Member for Thurrock (Jackie Doyle-Price) that I, too, am a romantic—that may come as a surprise to the House—especially when it comes to the constitution? I agree that flex is required and that it is highly desirable to have an unwritten...

Member
Michael Ellis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 c657
House
House of Commons

Programme (No. 2) motion relating to consideration of Lords amendments. Agreed to on question. Consideration of Lords amendments. Clause 2, motion to disagree with Lords amendment 1, debated and agreed to on division (292 to 217). Motion that a Committee be appointed to draw up Reasons to be assigned to...

Lead member
Michael Ellis
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
14 March 2022
Reference
710 cc641-657
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I have it in command from Her Majesty the Queen to acquaint the House that Her Majesty, having been informed of

the purport of the Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Bill, has consented to place her prerogative, so far as it is affected by the Bill, at the...

Member
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2022
Reference
819 cc347-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord True

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2022
Reference
819 c348
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank your Lordships’ House for its expertise and careful work on the Bill. It has again demonstrated the constitutional, legal and political expertise that makes this House such a remarkable revising Chamber. The Government have valued those exchanges, as have I. I particularly thank the noble Baroness,...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2022
Reference
819 c348
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lady Smith of Basildon, who is unable to be with us this morning as she is having a briefing at the moment, I thank the noble Lord for his usual courtesy in dealing with the House and for taking this Bill through...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2022
Reference
819 c348
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my thanks. It is important that we conduct legislation in the House, and off the Floor in between the different

stages, in the way we did on this Bill and I hope will do also on the Elections Bill—a much longer and more complex Bill. Indeed,...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2022
Reference
819 c348
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I join in thanking everybody. I have two points, one serious and one less so. One is an entirely private thought, so nobody is listening to me saying this: I hope the Commons has enough time to look at the issues that arise in relation to this Bill....

Member
Lord Judge (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2022
Reference
819 c349
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have just a small observation on the suggestion of the noble Lord, Lord True, that we were somehow telling the Commons to alter its procedures or advising it on its procedures in relation to this Bill. What we have done is say to the House of Commons...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2022
Reference
819 c349
House
House of Lords