Skip to main content

21-40 of 207 results for subject:Teletext

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Amendment 227 would introduce a sensible amount of flexibility. In many, perhaps even most organisations, each director, especially the executive ones, carries out a different role. It is possible that some of the directors may still be of value to the appointed person in his role in the registry when...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c229
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Earl for his offer of help. The Government recognise that it may not be appropriate in every case for all the directors to be deprived of their functions and, taking that into account, we are prepared to accept the amendment. Amendment 227 agreed. Amendments...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c229
House
House of Lords

229A: Clause 20, page 22, line 6, leave out "an" and insert "a qualifying" Amendment 229A agreed. Amendment 230 not moved. Clause 20, as amended, agreed. Clause 21 : Functions of C4C in relation to media content Amendment 230A Clause 21 : Functions of C4C in relation to media content...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c230-1
House
House of Lords

230A: Clause 21, page 22, line 38, leave out ", taken as a whole,"

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c231
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 230A probes the relationship between Channel 4’s existing remit and the new one which is being debated today. Channel 4’s existing remit is set out in Section 265 of the Communications Act which, as it is unamended by this Bill, will therefore remain in force. Subsection (3)...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c231
House
House of Lords

225C: Clause 19, page 20, line 17, leave out "an" and insert "a qualifying" Amendment 225C agreed. Amendment 225D Moved by

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c223
House
House of Lords

225D: Clause 19, page 20, line 21, leave out "and any consequences of the failure"

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c223
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I understand it, the purpose of this amendment is to ensure that the order appointing the manager details the steps that the Secretary of State considers appropriate for the registry to take to remedy its failure, or the consequences of its failure, being those that the registry...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c225-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the two amendments in this group are tabled to probe the remuneration of the manager. Will the Minister take into consideration the pay of the manager—or indeed, possibly managers—whom the person will be replacing, or will the new manager be paid on public servant scales? The power to...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c225
House
House of Lords

226: Clause 19, page 21, line 10, leave out "may" and insert "must"

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c225
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am afraid that I cannot grant the earnest wish of the noble Lord, Lord Howard, in relation to the Government’s attitude. The amendment would artificially limit to six months the time that is available to the manager to remedy the failure of a registry. I assure the...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c224
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Bill could last a long time. The order could still be running after a registry changes its constitution and could be made up in very many different ways—it could be quite difficult for any directors who are left in place if the manager is foisted on them...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c224
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a probing amendment. The period of six months that it specifies is not set in stone. The important point is to establish for how long the Minister envisages these orders being in effect. It would make sense for there to be a statutory time limit. If...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c224
House
House of Lords

225E: Clause 19, page 20, line 34, at end insert— "( ) The Secretary of State must discharge the order no more than six months after its commencement."

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c223
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his reply. I look forward to hearing from him, and I hope that he will say the same sort of thing on many occasions this afternoon. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 225D withdrawn. Amendment 225E Moved by

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c223
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start on a positive note by bringing noble Lords good news. I have listened carefully to what the noble Lord has said and I sympathise with his reason for tabling the amendment. The Government will consider this further, perhaps with a view to coming back with a...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c223
House
House of Lords

That reinforces what I have been saying. We think that we have enough in the Bill to satisfy the understandable concerns of the noble Lord, Lord Howard.

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c227
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may suggest to the Minister where he might find comfort. Subsection (2) of new Section 124O to be inserted in the Communications Act 2003 under Clause 19 states: ""The Secretary of State may by order appoint a manager in respect of the property and affairs of the internet...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c227
House
House of Lords

227: Clause 19, page 21, line 17, after "for" insert "any of"

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c229
House
House of Lords

My apologies for being a bit previous on this group. To reiterate the assurance in relation to Amendment 226A, we share the view that in taking over the registry at this stage, the role of the manager will be to remedy the failure and the consequences of the failure, and...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 February 2010
Reference
717 c226
House
House of Lords