Skip to main content

21-30 of 223 results for subject:Parcelforce

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I thank the noble Lord for expressing that more clearly than I did. The Government have already produced an impact assessment on the proposals in the Bill. It looked at the impact of the proposals on all parts of the United Kingdom. The universality of the universal postal service means...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c121
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for her full reply and to all noble Lords who have spoken. At times I felt caught in the crossfire to the right and the left of me when I was simply moving a simple amendment designed to secure a fair deal...

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c121-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 12 wishes to direct any proceeds received from a sale of shares to investment in the post office network and the universal postal service. I certainly agree that the both the Post Office and the universal service require long-term funding certainty if we are to secure both...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c65
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, will she answer my point? I said that you could maintain a universal service but price it out of the market by making it unattractive to users because of the price.

Member
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c60
House
House of Lords

I must intervene before the noble Lord withdraws the amendment. I am a student of Machiavelli and I have always regarded the noble Lord, Lord Lea of Crondall, as the model of The Prince.

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c105
House
House of Lords

12A: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) a schedule of assets held by Royal Mail Holdings plc and used for the provision of directly managed Post Office branches which also details— (i) a schedule of those assets which will be transferred to the Royal Mail...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c66
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response, which is rather depressing in its rejection of our proposal. My reference to the pension deficit fund dealt with the assets. Tagged on to the end of that discussion was a comment that, in return for obtaining the assets, the Government were also...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c65-6
House
House of Lords

12: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) that the receipts of the sale will be used exclusively for the purpose of investment in the Post Office network of branches and future investment in the delivery of the universal postal service by a Royal Mail company...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c63
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead, could never offend me.

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c61
House
House of Lords

That is a bonus. I will briefly try to answer some of the points. The noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, was the first person to speak in the debate. I recognise that he is a most important person to the people whom I worked with all my working life: he is...

Member
Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c61-3
House
House of Lords