Skip to main content

4601-4700 of 4,704 results for subject:Fracking

Type

-
Early day motions (7)
+ Legislation (12) + Acts (1)
-
Public acts (1)
+ Bills (7) + Public bills (7)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (6)
-
Presentation bills (3)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (4)
-
Statutory instruments (4)
+ Members' contributions (3,640)
-
Business questions (29)
-
Maiden speeches (3)
-
Oral answers to questions (257)
-
Oral question time interventions (9)
+ Oral questions (262)
-
Prime Minister's questions (25)
-
Topical questions (47)
-
Points of order (9)
-
Proceeding contributions (3,112)
+ Parliamentary committees (83) + Committee proceedings (29)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (6)
-
European Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (10)
-
Select Committee reports (10)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (6)
-
Select Committee written evidence (45)
+ Parliamentary papers (77)
-
Command papers (2)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (25)
-
House of Commons papers (42)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Unprinted command papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (125) + Debates (74)
-
Adjournment debates (9)
-
Backbench debates (6)
+ Committee proceedings (29)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (6)
-
European Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (10)
-
Debates on select committee reports (2)
+ Legislative debates (29)
-
Debates on bills (17)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (12)
+ Monarch's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (1)
-
Opposition days (2)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
+ Formal proceedings (1)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (1)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (46) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Written statements (45)
-
Urgent questions (2)
+ Written corrections (1)
-
Ministerial corrections (1)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,115)
-
Business questions (29)
+ Oral questions (262)
-
Prime Minister's questions (25)
-
Topical questions (47)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Urgent questions (2)
-
Written questions (821)
+ Research briefings (15)
-
Commons Briefing papers (5)
-
Commons Debate packs (6)
+ Lords Library Briefings (3)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (2)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what assessment has been made of the extent of possible shale gas reserves throughout the UK.

[141057]

Asked by
Gregory Campbell (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 February 2013
Reference
141057; 557 c985W
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, whether his assessment of fracking in the US included any information on (a) people poisoned by water contamination and (b) buildings damaged by earth tremors as a result of fracking.
Asked by
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
140472; 557 cc1045-6
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what recent progress he has made on facilitating the exploitation of shale gas reserves.
Asked by
Christopher Pincher (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
140475; 557 c1046
House
House of Commons

Now for shale gas, Mr Speaker. Shale gas has exciting potential, but we need to move forward with the right measures to ensure safe and secure operations, and reassure local communities. As for the US experience, so far as we know there has been no confirmed instance of any person being poisoned by water contamination or of buildings being damaged by earth tremors as a result of fracking.

Answered by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1045
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for that clear answer. I know that he will not want to be critical of his predecessors in the Department, but why has it taken 18 months to discover such a simple fact, which, if promulgated earlier, would have set at rest the minds of people in the areas where frack drilling is likely to take place ?

Asked by
Lord Lilley (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1045
House
House of Commons

As my right hon. Friend knows, the Secretary of State has made it clear that he has put in place conditions, regulations, and secure and safe circumstances that will allow the continued exploration for shale gas. Shale gas is a potential virtue, but it has to be pursued in a way that is safe and secure, and guarantees public support.

Answered by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1045
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister take heed of the words of his predecessor, the hon. Member for Wealden (Charles Hendry), who warned against “betting the farm” on shale gas? Will the Minister assure me that the Government’s perspective on this issue is not influenced by the over-inflated claims made by firms that are major donors to, and have close links with, the Tory party? Such firms include the one that put in the recent planning application for exploratory drilling in Somerset and has given £500,000 to the Tories.

Asked by
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1045
House
House of Commons

There will be a proper planning process subject to all the normal scrutiny and discipline. Of course we must move ahead with caution, but to ignore this opportunity and cast aside this potential would be folly.

Answered by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1046
House
House of Commons

Consistency is the watchword that characterises all the work that my hon. Friend does in this place, for in the Select Committee he made just that point and urged the Government to move ahead with another licensing round as soon as possible. We need to test and we need to establish the scale of this potential. Without exploration we cannot do that—he is absolutely right.

Answered by
John Hayes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1046
House
House of Commons

The British Geological Survey suggests that there could be 10 trillion cubic feet of gas under the Bowland field, whereas Cuadrilla suggests that there may be as much as 200 trillion. Would not the best way to determine who is right, so that we find out just what impact this vital resource could have and to ensure that we can get players into the marketplace, be for the Department to release the information it has and forge ahead on the next licensing round? That would allow us to get players into the marketplace and just do it.

Asked by
Christopher Pincher (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
31 January 2013
Reference
557 c1046
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what fiscal steps he plans to take to ensure that local communities benefit financially from any extraction of shale gas.

[139729]

Asked by
Mark Menzies (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 January 2013
Reference
139729; 557 cc729-730W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent assessment he has made of the toxicity level of chemicals used or proposed for use in Cuadrilla Resources hydraulic fracturing operations.

[138674]

Asked by
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative)
Answering body
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 January 2013
Reference
138674; 557 cc758-9W
House
House of Commons

What assurances can the Minister give me that if shale gas production is given the go-ahead in Fylde it will not be just the Treasury or the company that will benefit, and that substantial benefits will flow to the local community?

Asked by
Mark Menzies (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
29 January 2013
Reference
557 c780
House
House of Commons

I know that my hon. Friend has a strong constituency interest in this issue. We want to see the shale gas revolution come to the United Kingdom—it has done wonders for the United States economy—but that must, of course, happen in a way that does not damage the environment and enables communities to benefit. I shall be happy to work with my hon. Friend, and other Members of Parliament throughout the House who may be affected, to ensure that communities share the benefits—which I hope can be shared by the whole economy—of this new form of energy extraction.

Answered by
George Osborne (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
29 January 2013
Reference
557 c780
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what estimate his Department has made of the potential effects on energy bills for small and medium-sized businesses of the development of shale gas extraction.

[137482]

Asked by
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 2013
Reference
137482; 557 c336W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health what evaluation has been conducted by (a) his Department and (b) the Health Protection Agency of the potential health effects on householders of the use of shale gas obtained from hydraulic fracturing containing naturally occurring radon gas.

[138487]

Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 2013
Reference
138487; 557 c361W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if he will consider further ways of ensuring that local acceptance is a material consideration in a planning appeal considered by the Planning Inspectorate for fracking rig installation.

[138695]

Asked by
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 January 2013
Reference
557 c299W; 138695
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what assessment he has made of the risks to public safety of naturally occurring radon gas mixed with shale gas obtained from hydraulic fracturing; and what methods are used to separate the radon from the methane in shale gas...

Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 January 2013
Reference
138479; 557 c73W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what steps he will take to prevent fracking operations in the Mendip Hills contaminating groundwater in that area.

[136781]

Asked by
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative)
Answering body
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 January 2013
Reference
136781; 557 c84W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what recent discussions he has had with Ministerial colleagues on the potential effect of fracking rig installations in National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

[136780]

Asked by
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative)
Answering body
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 January 2013
Reference
136780; 556 c277W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change which locations in Wales he has identified as possible sites for shale gas development.

[136529]

Asked by
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
136529; 556 c768W
House
House of Commons

(2) what estimate he has made of the number of jobs that will be created in Wales if shale gas is extracted on a commercial basis.

[136692]

Jonathan Edwards:

Asked by
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
136692; 556 c768W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what recent representations he has received from the Welsh Government on the exploitation of Welsh shale gas resources.

[136531]

Asked by
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 January 2013
Reference
136531; 556 c769W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what plans he has to monitor changes in water quality in Bleasdale, Lancashire caused as a result of fracking.

[135940]

Asked by
Ben Wallace (Conservative)
Answering body
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 January 2013
Reference
135940; 556 c682W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government if he will consider further ways of safeguarding (a) landscape character and (b) visual amenity in the planning process for fracking rig installation.

[135088]

Asked by
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative)
Answering body
Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 January 2013
Reference
135088; 556 c248W
House
House of Commons

My Lords, perhaps I may start by welcoming the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, to his position on the Front Bench for the Bill. I am delighted to see him there and, having listened to the debate, he will realise that we are in for a lively time—as I do. I...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2013
Reference
742 cc105-9
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what monitoring will take place of fracking off the Fylde coast.

[134881]

Asked by
Tony Cunningham (Labour)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 January 2013
Reference
134881; 556 c141W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change what his timetable is for his Department's study into the possible impacts of shale gas extraction on greenhouse gas emissions.

[135089]

Asked by
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 January 2013
Reference
135089; 556 c141W
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship again, Mr Bayley. Before I go into the argument for community compensation, I will set the background for the impact of fracking in terms of the present energy demands on the county of Lancashire. At the moment, we face energy projects...

Member
Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 cc293-4WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for securing this debate on a subject that is hugely important and of great concern to my constituents. I urge the Minister to take on board the point that my constituents, like those of my hon. Friend, are incredibly worried that fracking could be done...

Member
Mark Menzies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 c294WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend and neighbouring MP. To underline the point to the Minister, there has been speculation in the papers that if industrial fracking happens, there could be some 800 wellheads across Lancashire, against the background of onshore and offshore wind farms and the possibility of new nuclear....

Member
Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 cc294-5WH
House
House of Commons

I declare my interest, as on the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. Does my hon. Friend agree that on fracking, Lancashire is once again leading the way? Should operations expand, it should be laid down in regulations that local residents, not absentee landlords, receive the compensation.

Member
Karen Lumley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 c295WH
House
House of Commons

As ever, my hon. Friend spots where I am going, and I am glad she is here to support that.

There is lots of talk about job creation, but as far as I can see, the thousands of jobs promised will not be created. As I understand the engineering process, once...

Member
Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 cc295-6WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood (Eric Ollerenshaw) on securing this debate.

I am concerned that there are no plans for new extraction regulations. We met with the Secretary of State before the statement last week and he made it plain that he believes that existing European directives...

Member
Mark Hendrick (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 cc296-7WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood (Eric Ollerenshaw), who yet again demonstrated why he is known as such a formidable, and probably unequalled, champion of the interests of his constituents. He also demonstrated his strong commitment not just to his own constituency, but to the...

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 cc297-8WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Mark Hendrick (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 c298WH
House
House of Commons

I shall make some progress, if I may, because I want to reply to the many important questions raised.

I hope that my hon. Friends the Members for Lancaster and Fleetwood and for Fylde, who have engaged in the debate sensibly and robustly, take comfort from my reassurances but appreciate our...

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 cc298-300WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Mark Hendrick (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 c300WH
House
House of Commons

I will not, I am afraid. I am close to coming to the end of my—

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 c300WH
House
House of Commons

I thought the Minister wanted to make some progress.

Member
Mark Hendrick (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 c300WH
House
House of Commons

I do, to get to the end of the points made by my hon. Friend the Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood.

The hazard potential of all substances proposed to be injected into the ground will be assessed, and the use of substances hazardous to groundwater will not be permitted.

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 c300WH
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Bayley, the subject of the debate involves the benefit to the people of Lancashire. The Minister is going into a great deal of technical detail about the safety issues, when he should be discussing the benefit to the people of Lancashire.

Member
Mark Hendrick (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 c300WH
House
House of Commons

I am also mindful that the debate was secured by my hon. Friend the Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood and that it is unusual for other Members to speak as well. The hon. Member for Preston has done well already, so in the remaining time I should answer my hon....

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 cc300-1WH
House
House of Commons
Lead member
Eric Ollerenshaw
Answering member
Lord Barker of Battle
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
19 December 2012
Reference
555 cc292-301WH
House
House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change (Edward Davey) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement.

Shale gas development has been of increasing importance in the US for some years, but exploration has only just begun in the UK. The potential of producing shale gas...

Member
Baroness Verma (Conservative)
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written statements
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
741 cc139-147WS
House
House of Lords

Shale gas development has been of increasing importance in the US for some years, but exploration has only just begun in the UK. The potential of producing shale gas from a suitable formation can only be established by fracturing the rock, and it happens that the fracturing of the first...

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written statements
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 cc44-8WS
House
House of Commons

Shale gas may prove to be a useful addition to the UK’s diverse portfolio of energy sources, and would be particularly valuable in replacing declining North sea supplies, with benefits to energy security as well as to the economy and employment—but its exploitation will be acceptable only if it is safe and the environment is properly protected.

Hydraulic fracturing operations for shale gas were suspended last year, pending consideration of seismic events in Lancashire. Based on the latest evidence and expert advice, and having considered the responses to a public consultation on that advice, I have concluded that, in principle, fracking for shale gas can be allowed to resume— subject to new controls to mitigate the risk of seismicity. I have made full details available to both Houses by means of a comprehensive written statement tabled this morning.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c431
House
House of Commons

I want to see proper environmental safeguards and generous community benefits for the areas where fracking will take place, but does my right hon. Friend agree that shale gas has the potential not only to lead an industrial renaissance in this country but to play a serious part in dealing with fuel poverty?

Asked by
Andrew Selous (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c431
House
House of Commons

I agree that shale gas has an important part to play in our energy mix and in our economy, and I also agree that we must ensure that communities benefit and that there is proper environmental regulation. I have been very impressed by the way in which Members in all parts of the House have contributed to the debate and to the Department’s thinking, but I pay particular tribute to the hon. Member for Fylde (Mark Menzies), who, along with the independent experts, has really influenced our thinking. It is very important for us to take the public with us as we explore the potential for shale gas in the United Kingdom.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c431
House
House of Commons

Many of my constituents remain concerned about the parallels that they perceive between shale extraction in the United States and what is being planned in the United Kingdom. Will the Secretary of State say a little more about why he thinks that the regulatory environment here will be superior to that of the United States, thereby disproving many of the alarmist stories that are circulating?

Asked by
Paul Maynard (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c431
House
House of Commons

Let me also pay tribute to the work that my hon. Friend has done for his constituents, who I know are concerned about shale gas. I can reassure him that the regulations that we already have in the United Kingdom are much stronger than those in many American states where fracking for gas has been taking place for many years. We have the regulations, controls and powers of the Environment Agency, the regulations, controls and powers of the Health and Safety Executive and the

regulations, controls and powers of my own Department, so we already have a strong regulatory regime. However, if the exploration suggests that there is potential for commercial development and we move in that direction, we will keep that regime under review, and will tighten and strengthen it if necessary. Today’s announcement is about new controls to ensure that seismicity is not a problem.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c431
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Secretary of State’s reassurance that environmental and safety concerns will be given a high priority, but some people fear that those whom the press have dubbed the frackheads in the Government are rushing ahead with tax incentives for shale gas exploration without taking the time to look into those concerns first. Can the right hon. Gentleman reassure me that no tax incentives will be introduced until we are 100% sure that it is safe to go ahead with fracking in this country?

Asked by
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c432
House
House of Commons

I do not think that anyone has described me as a frackhead. My job is to make certain that the environmental and safety controls are there, and I believe that the work that we have done, particularly on the seismicity aspect but also on other aspects, can reassure the public in that regard. I am determined to ensure that the environment is properly protected, and as Members will see if they read my statement, I have also commissioned a study of the potential impact of shale gas exploration on greenhouse gas emissions. I hope that that will reassure people on the environmental side as well.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c432
House
House of Commons

I welcomed the announcement of the formation of the Office for Unconventional Gas last week, and I thank the Secretary of State and Ministers for all the work that they have done in that respect. However, some of my constituents have subsequently expressed concern about the possibility that the office is not fully independent. What assurances can the Secretary of State give that it will both improve regulations and be robust, transparent and able to respond to any concerns that Fylde residents may express?

Asked by
Mark Menzies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c432
House
House of Commons

I repeat my thanks to the hon. Gentleman. The way in which he has stood up for his constituents provides a model for all Members. I can reassure him that the Office for Unconventional Gas will be a strong office, and that it will be in my Department and accountable to Ministers, so that Members can hold us to account in the House. One of its jobs will be bringing together the various regulatory bodies so that they are properly co-ordinated, and our work as we approach potential commercial development in a few years’ time will include ensuring that we have all the regulatory controls that we need.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c432
House
House of Commons

Is the Minister aware that you cannot be too sure what happens once you start drilling a long way through strata? In my area, after a pit had closed a whole village had to be removed and rebuilt on the other side of the road because of the escape of methane and other gases. I have heard that a company is drilling within a mile of that area now. It may not be anything to do with this fracking business, but I hope that the Minister will tell people to keep their noses out, because otherwise there might be another explosion in the area.

Asked by
Dennis Skinner (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c432
House
House of Commons

The whole House listens to the hon. Gentleman closely on these issues because he is an expert on drilling and all aspects of the coal industry. I do not know the case to which he refers, but if he wishes to write to me, I am sure my officials can look into it. He makes an important contribution to this debate, because he highlights the fact that this country has had to tackle methane emissions in the coal and the oil and gas industries, so we have a lot of knowledge, experience and expertise to draw on to make sure we can control emissions from shale gas.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c433
House
House of Commons

I can see how excited Members on the Government Benches are about the potential for shale gas, but I wonder whether they will be equally excited if drilling starts in Wiltshire, Lincolnshire or other parts of the country. As the Secretary of State knows, we have always said fracking should go ahead only if it is safe and environmentally sound. We set out six conditions, and we will be looking to see if they are met in the Government’s written statement today.

On prices, last week the Chancellor said he did not want the British public to miss out if gas prices tumbled as a result of discoveries of shale gas, but does the Secretary of State agree with the former Energy Minister, the hon. Member for Wealden (Charles Hendry), as well as most experts, that

“betting the farm on shale brings serious risks of future price rises”?

Asked by
Caroline Flint (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c433
House
House of Commons

First, I thank the right hon. Lady for saying she will look at our statement carefully. I know that her colleague, the hon. Member for Rutherglen and Hamilton West (Tom Greatrex), wrote to my hon. Friend the Member for Wealden when he was a Minister to set out the Opposition’s conditions. I believe that when the Opposition study the written ministerial statement—we gave a copy to the right hon. Lady before this Question Time, but she should have a chance to examine it—they will see that we have met all the conditions.

The right hon. Lady’s main question was on prices. I agree with my hon. Friend the Member for Wealden that we should not bet the farm on shale gas. I am absolutely clear that the most responsible and sensible way forward for energy policy is to have a diverse set of resources and sources for our energy. Some of the press and commentariat have got very excited about the possibility of gas prices falling, but the independent analysis and the International Energy Agency findings do not necessarily support that.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c433
House
House of Commons

I welcome my right hon. Friend’s statement that there will be some further environmental studies, because is it not the case that at present we simply do not know the environmental impact of shale gas exploration in relation to methane seepage and methane getting out into the atmosphere? Until we can be certain of the impact, we must proceed with a great deal of caution.

Asked by
John Leech (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c433
House
House of Commons

I agree with my hon. Friend that we should proceed with caution, and we are doing so. The evidence so far suggests that the carbon footprint of shale gas exploration is only slightly higher than that for conventional gas, but I am determined that we in this country examine it seriously, which is why I have commissioned a study.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c434
House
House of Commons

We liaise closely with the Environment Agency on this issue, and it confirms that volumes of water used in shale gas exploration are not exceptional compared with other industrial activities that routinely take place across the United Kingdom. Any operator who wishes to abstract water as an alternative to using public supplies will need a licence. Additional water abstraction will be authorised only where it is sustainable and no risks are posed to the rights of existing abstraction licence holders.

Shale gas exploration is at a very early stage in the UK, and its possible scale is as yet unknown. We have legally binding carbon budgets, and that should reassure

the hon. Lady. In addition, I hope that she will be reassured to know that I have announced today that I am commissioning a study of the possible impacts of shale gas development on greenhouse gas emissions.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 cc441-2
House
House of Commons

On the first part of my question, when one recognises the fact that 4 million gallons of water are needed for every single frack, the Minister’s answer about the water supply is very complacent. On the second part, on carbon emissions, why do the official scenarios published last week alongside his gas generation plan set out an option for carbon intensity that is four times higher than the maximum level compatible with meeting our carbon budgets?

Asked by
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c442
House
House of Commons

We have legally binding commitments under the Climate Change Act 2008, and our carbon budgets have been set out for people to look at. When we announce strategies it is not unusual for there to be a whole set of analyses, including sensitivity analysis. Yes, one analysis showed higher carbon intensities, but there was also an analysis that showed lower carbon intensities, and I think that people have missed that.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c442
House
House of Commons

Many of my constituents just to the west of the Singleton Well shale gas site draw their water from their own sink holes in the Bleasdale area and Bowland forest. Will the Minister’s Department monitor the exploration process throughout Lancashire, because if there is going to be a problem with the water supply, it will be in that part of my constituency?

Asked by
Ben Wallace (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c442
House
House of Commons

I am grateful for the hon. Gentleman’s question. The Environment Agency will carry out the monitoring, but because we have increased the co-ordination of regulatory bodies, my Department will be aware of it. I hope that I assured him in my answer to the hon. Member for Brighton, Pavilion (Caroline Lucas) that the terms of any additional licences would have to ensure that the abstraction was sustainable and would not put at risk the rights of existing licence holders.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c442
House
House of Commons

In light of today’s announcement, does the Secretary of State agree that fracking is not appropriate for the Mendip hills? The water that feeds the aptly named city of Wells and the villages that surround it in my constituency takes 900 to

1,000 years to reach the spas of Bath. Will the Secretary of State ensure that communities are consulted fully about this issue?

Asked by
Tessa Munt (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c446
House
House of Commons

I can certainly reassure my hon. Friend that communities will be fully consulted. We have made it clear that the regulatory regime is strong, and it will be strengthened if need be. We have put in the co-ordination that will give her constituents the reassurances that they need.

Answered by
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
555 c447
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what steps he has taken to exploit reserves of shale gas in the UK.
Asked by
Andrew Selous (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
133319; 555 cc430-4
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what steps he has taken to exploit reserves of shale gas in the UK.
Asked by
Paul Maynard (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
133331; 555 cc430-4
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what assessment he has made of the environmental effects of shale gas exploitation in the UK.
Asked by
Kerry McCarthy (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
133333; 555 cc431-4
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that safety and environmental concerns regarding shale gas exploration and extraction are addressed before shale gas reserves are developed.
Asked by
Mark Menzies (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
133336; 555 cc431-4
House
House of Commons
To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change, what recent advice he has received on the effects of shale gas exploitation on (a) water resources and (b) carbon budgets.
Asked by
Caroline Lucas (Green Party)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
13 December 2012
Reference
133330; 555 cc441-2
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Energy and Climate Change Committee
Date
6 November 2012
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change pursuant to the oral answer of 17 May 2012, Official Report, column 690, what discussions he has had with Ministers in the Welsh Government on hydraulic fracturing in Wales; and whether Ministers in the Welsh Government have requested that...

Asked by
Jonathan Edwards (Plaid Cymru)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 June 2012
Reference
109119; 546 c200W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change pursuant to the oral answer of 17 May 2012, Official Report, column 681, on shale gas, if he will place a transcript of the seminar on shale gas in the Library.

[109722]

Asked by
Caroline Flint (Labour)
Answering body
Energy and Climate Change
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 June 2012
Reference
109722; 546 cc198-200W
House
House of Commons

I am delighted to have secured this debate on fracking—or, to give it its proper title, hydraulic fracturing. I hope that by the end of the debate we shall have laid some myths to rest, and that the House will be satisfied that the opportunity that fracking presents is being...

Member
David Morris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 cc49-50WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing this debate on an important issue. I am a supporter of the economic and environmental benefits of shale gas. Does my hon. Friend agree that the data show that it has cut carbon emissions in a way that wind, solar and biomass have...

Member
Guy Opperman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c50WH
House
House of Commons

Yes, I agree, and we should be striving towards a lower-carbon economy. Shale gas would contribute to that. It is better for the environment than other energy sources—that has already been acknowledged—and it now helps to meet Government targets for low emissions, as my hon. Friend has just said. Research...

Member
David Morris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c50WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend, and neighbour, on securing the debate. On the issues he listed, does he agree that what is not understood by the powers that be is that the water source for residents in my area—particularly in Bleasdale—is their own bore holes? Residents are extremely worried about...

Member
Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c50WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend, whose constituency is next to mine, for the work that he has done locally on the issue. There are issues to be addressed in the contexts that he mentioned. Like him, I am worried about contamination of water supply in the area. I want to...

Member
David Morris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c50WH
House
House of Commons

I am sure that my hon. Friend is coming on to this point. I endorse the comments of my hon. Friend the Member for Lancaster and Fleetwood (Eric Ollerenshaw). Just as mineral rights and the benefits from wind power are felt not by the wider community but by an individual...

Member
Guy Opperman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c51WH
House
House of Commons

Hear, hear! I agree with everything that my hon. Friend said.

We have all seen things go wrong in certain parts of America, but we must also bear in mind that last year the Americans drilled 45,000 wells, with very few problems. They are also operating much older wells that exist...

Member
David Morris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c51WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing the debate and giving the issue such rigorous, thoughtful and well researched attention, as it deserves.

The role of unconventional gas and hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, is indeed topical. I have just come back from the United States, and no one there who takes...

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c51WH
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way and I apologise for interrupting his speech just as he was gaining momentum. He talks eloquently about the way in which America is transforming its energy provision and dramatically reducing its energy bills. In his State of the Union address in...

Member
Guy Opperman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c51WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. I could not agree more, and I will elaborate on those points during the course of my speech and endeavour to answer the questions that have been raised.

There are not only huge opportunities here for us, but some big challenges. We need to be rigorous and thoughtful in addressing...

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c52WH
House
House of Commons

May I raise another problem on top of the two that I raised with my hon. Friend the Member for Morecambe and Lunesdale (David Morris)? The north part of Lancashire, which is in the constituency of my hon. Friend the Member for Fylde (Mark Menzies),

faces shale gas exploration, and...

Member
Eric Ollerenshaw (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c52WH
House
House of Commons

But apart from that—[Laughter.] No, my hon. Friend makes a serious point and I understand his concerns. No one could suggest that Lancashire is not taking more than its fair share of the burden of the energy economy. However, there are many opportunities to be gained. Each of the points...

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c53WH
House
House of Commons

I welcome the point about the wider picture. In Northumberland, which is no less deserving than Lancashire, there are applications for two open-cast mines. Given that those open-cast mines will exist for years and will produce barely eight to 10 days’ worth of coal for particular power stations, and that...

Member
Guy Opperman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c53WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend’s eloquent intervention is on the record, and I certainly take on board his points. I now want to crack on because I want to reply in some detail to the serious points that my hon. Friend the Member for Morecambe and Lunesdale raised in his opening speech.

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c53WH
House
House of Commons

I very much welcome the cautious way in which the Minister is explaining this issue to the Chamber. It is important that we balance the apparent short-term gain against the serious danger of long-term detriment, which will be impossible to reverse once the process is under way.

Member
Gerald Kaufman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c53WH
House
House of Commons

There are good reasons to think that, whatever the resource may be, shale gas will not develop as dramatically here as it has in the US. Britain is a much more densely populated country, and shale

gas is still in its very early days here. Just one well in the...

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c53WH
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister give way?

Member
Joan Walley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c54WH
House
House of Commons

I will give way, and then I really want to crack on.

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c54WH
House
House of Commons

I am very grateful to the Minister for giving way; I know that time is of the essence. Regarding the environmental integrity that he has just mentioned, can he tell us what cross-cutting work he is doing, first with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs in respect of...

Member
Joan Walley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 c54WH
House
House of Commons

I will come to the points about groundwater pollution later in my remarks—if I am able to get to them. In respect of the work with the Department of Health and DEFRA, I fear that I will have to write to the hon. Lady to let her know about that...

Member
Lord Barker of Battle (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 cc54-7WH
House
House of Commons

Westminster Hall adjournment debate on fracking.

Lead member
David Morris
Department
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
22 May 2012
Reference
545 cc48-56WH
House
House of Commons

I very much welcome the comments made by the chair of the Environment Agency. I believe he is correct in assessing that, subject to rigorous regulation and monitoring, hydraulic fracturing can safely be used in the UK for shale gas exploration. I also agree on the need to proceed with caution. Fracking should be carried out only under close regulatory control, to ensure that risks are minimised and the environment is fully protected.

Answered by
Charles Hendry (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2012
Reference
545 c684
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is absolutely correct, because we cannot ignore what is happening elsewhere around the world. The gas price in the United States is now one quarter of that in Europe and one seventh of that in Asia, so this is a game-changing technology. However, our commitment is absolutely clear: for this to go ahead, we have to have the tightest regulatory controls and the greatest focus on environmental protection. This is a densely populated island, we have to have public support for this technology going forward and we intend to go about this in a very constructive way, involving all the expert opinion we can.

Answered by
Charles Hendry (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2012
Reference
545 c684
House
House of Commons

Let me give the hon. Gentleman an absolute assurance that all those issues will be completely taken into account. The fluid used is 99% water and there are already very strict controls on how it is used and on what happens after it has been through the process. There are very strong regulations, too, on how the fracking activity is separated from the water table and they are often several thousand feet apart. All those issues will be considered with the greatest care before we go forward. We believe that this technology has real potential, but it must be used in the safest possible way.

Answered by
Charles Hendry (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Energy and Climate Change
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 May 2012
Reference
545 c684
House
House of Commons