Skip to main content

401-500 of 73,050 results for subject:Protection

Type

-
Early day motions (127)
+ Legislation (803) + Acts (51)
-
Public acts (51)
+ Bills (215) + Public bills (215)
-
Consolidation bills (1)
-
Government bills (37)
+ Private members' bills (177)
-
Ballot bills (33)
-
Presentation bills (46)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (25)
-
Ten minute rule bills (73)
-
Church of England measures (2)
+ Delegated legislation (535) + Statutory instruments (535)
-
Public body orders (2)
+ Members' contributions (57,663)
-
Business questions (219)
-
Maiden speeches (60)
-
Oral answers to questions (1,974)
-
Oral corrections (1)
-
Oral question time interventions (40)
+ Oral questions (2,066)
-
Prime Minister's questions (83)
-
Topical questions (108)
-
Points of order (20)
-
Proceeding contributions (53,578)
+ Parliamentary committees (1,382) + Committee proceedings (831)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (14)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (120)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (108)
-
European Committee proceedings (26)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (343)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (146)
-
Select Committee reports (256)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (120)
-
Select Committee written evidence (197)
+ Parliamentary papers (2,893)
-
Annual reports (48)
-
Command papers (259)
-
Consultation papers (376)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (46)
-
Deposited papers (1,657)
-
House of Commons papers (669)
-
House of Lords papers (73)
-
Impact assessments (181)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (6)
-
Transport and Works Act order applications (2)
-
Treaties (129)
-
Unprinted command papers (7)
-
Unprinted papers (110)
-
White papers (14)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (3,352) + Debates (2,096)
-
Adjournment debates (217)
-
Backbench debates (46)
+ Committee proceedings (831)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (14)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (120)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (108)
-
European Committee proceedings (26)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (343)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (146)
-
Debates on select committee reports (27)
-
Debates on treaties (1)
-
e-petition debates (13)
-
Emergency debate applications (1)
-
Estimates days (2)
+ Legislative debates (1,399)
-
Debates on bills (1,139)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (260)
+ Monarch's speech debates (12)
-
King's speech debates (1)
-
Queen's speech debates (11)
-
Opposition days (15)
-
Questions for short debate (56)
+ Formal proceedings (14)
-
Legislative formal proceedings (9)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (5)
+ Petitions and observations (32)
-
Observations on petitions (14)
-
Paper petitions (18)
-
Private notice questions (9)
+ Statements (1,124) + Oral statements (189)
-
Business statements (2)
-
Ministerial statements (178)
-
Select Committee statements (7)
-
Speaker's statements (2)
-
Written statements (935)
-
Urgent questions (27)
+ Written corrections (16)
-
Ministerial corrections (16)
+ Parliamentary questions (10,197)
-
Business questions (219)
+ Oral questions (2,066)
-
Prime Minister's questions (83)
-
Topical questions (108)
-
Private notice questions (9)
-
Urgent questions (27)
-
Written questions (7,876)
+ Petitions and observations (32)
-
Observations on petitions (14)
-
Paper petitions (18)
+ Research briefings (350) + Commons Briefing papers (225)
-
Briefing papers on bills (40)
-
Constituency casework (4)
-
Commons Debate packs (71)
+ Lords Briefing packs (2)
-
Lords Briefing packs - Debates (2)
+ Lords In Focus (1)
-
Lords In Focus - Bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (41)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (27)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Debates (10)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Topical (4)
-
POSTbriefs (1)
-
POSTnotes (9)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My hon. Friend will not be surprised to hear that I agree with everything he says. I note that the Father of the House, the right hon. Member for Gainsborough (Sir Edward Leigh), chose not to use the word “illegal”. Does my hon. Friend agree with me that it is...

Member
Seamus Logan (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
791 c411
House
House of Commons

No one in this world is illegal—[Interruption.] I hear chuntering from the Conservative Front Bench as usual. People are fleeing for their lives from situations across the world. They are fleeing from oppression—

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
791 c411
House
House of Commons

From France.

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
791 c411
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Member for Croydon South (Chris Philp) says they are fleeing from France, but where does he think they have come from? They come from some of the worst war-torn countries. I challenge him to go there and live for six months just to see how he would...

Member
Pete Wishart (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
791 c411
House
House of Commons

On that point, will the hon. Gentleman give way?

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
791 c411
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Financial Services Regulation Committee
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
HL 64 2026-27
House
House of Lords

This is an imperative for the Home Office. The proposal contained in the planning application includes on-site 24/7 security and CCTV. We have already introduced those measures on other large sites such as Wethersfield, which has operated in that way for years. As my hon. Friend the Member for Edinburgh...

Member
Jo White (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
791 c421
House
House of Commons

I am repeating the following Written Ministerial Statement made today in the other place by my Honourable Friend the Minister for Youth, Gambling, Digital Inclusion, Civil Society and Loneliness, Vicky Foxcroft MP:

Today I am publishing a consultation on strengthening the Charity Commission for England and Wales’ ability to tackle extremist...

Member
Baroness Twycross (Labour)
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written statements
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
HLWS383
House
House of Lords

Today I am publishing a consultation on strengthening the Charity Commission for England and Wales’ ability to tackle extremist and other abuse of charities.

As part of the government’s efforts to tackle extremism, the government intends to enhance the powers available to the Charity Commission to disqualify individuals from acting...

Member
Vicky Foxcroft (Labour)
Department
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written statements
Date
14 October 2026
Reference
HCWS375
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what safeguards will be put in place for children and young people who, following a review at a transition point, move from an Education, Health and Care Plan to an Individual Support Plan.

Asked by
Mark Garnier (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
29939
House
House of Commons

Report stage. Government new clause NC23 debated with further new clauses and amendments. Government new clause NC23 agreed to. New clause NC25 negatived on division (189 to 306). Clause 1, amendment 1 negatived on division (196 to 304). Clause 6, amendment 18 negatived on division (89 to 312). Government amendments...

Lead member
Alex Norris; Sarah Sackman
Answering member
Nick Timothy; Kieran Mullan
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc229-339
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c230
House
House of Commons

It is an honour to open the debate on the Report stage of the Courts and Tribunals Bill, and to bring this important piece of legislation back before the House. This is a Bill with victims at its heart. Its purpose is urgent and long overdue: to ensure that justice...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc245-7
House
House of Commons

I am extremely grateful to the Minister for throwing the kitchen sink at the problem, including court repairs. We wish to see those repairs make progress at Taunton Crown court. The Minister was good enough to write to me at the beginning of the summer to explain that the court,...

Member
Gideon Amos (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c247
House
House of Commons

I was glad to meet the hon. Member to discuss the situation at Taunton, which I know has been a deep source of frustration. Nothing could more exemplify the years of neglect of our justice system than our crumbling court estate that was presided over by the Conservatives. This Government...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc247-9
House
House of Commons

Is the hon. and learned Lady as concerned as I am about the backlog in the magistrates court, which is four times larger than that in the Crown court and growing at 16% a year, whereas the Crown court backlog is stabilised? If this really is a reform in the...

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c249
House
House of Commons

I do not accept the premise of that question. I do not accept that we have a backlog in our magistrates court. What we have is a substantial caseload. The right hon. and learned Gentleman will know that the magistrates court hear more than 1.5 million cases a year, and...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc249-252
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to take part in the further consideration of the Courts and Tribunals Bill as we reach Report stage. Not for the first time with this ministerial team, this Justice Secretary and this Prime Minister, what we were told was necessary has turned out to be unnecessary,...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc252-3
House
House of Commons

As somebody who has had someone elect to have a jury and now awaits a trial in 2029 on a simple order breach, I ask the hon. Gentleman: does he think, in his defence of jury trials, that a victim should be able to say whether they want the case...

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c253
House
House of Commons

What we are talking about is where we draw the ledger. I do not think the hon. Member is suggesting that we should have everything done by magistrates. Why not have everything done by magistrates? If it is fundamentally unfair to allow people to have a jury trial, why not...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c253
House
House of Commons

I think the hon. Member misses the point of the question that was just raised. The question he seems to misunderstand is the fact that the right to choose a jury trial is being used by perpetrators to continue the abuse of the victims and survivors. Does he think that...

Member
Emily Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c254
House
House of Commons

I listened closely to the words that the hon. Member used: she talked about “perpetrators”. We heard the word again and again from Labour Members in Committee. May I remind her that defendants are not guilty until found guilty, and that this erosion of rights affects innocent people, too? Labour...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c254
House
House of Commons

Does the shadow Minister agree that justice must not only be done, but be seen to be done? One of the key cornerstones of getting justice is being tried by one’s peers, and giving that to a defendant builds confidence in a jury system.

Member
Ayoub Khan (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c254
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right. As I pointed out at the start, and as Labour Members have highlighted, it is not just people concerned about defendants who have raised concerns about the proposals; victims have as well. Victims groups wrote an extensive letter to the Secretary of State and the...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc254-5
House
House of Commons

I thank the shadow Minister for being generous with his time. What did his Government do in 14 years to ensure that people were tried by their peers? That is exactly what magistrates are there to do. I know that all too well, because my dad served as a magistrate...

Member
Rachel Taylor (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c255
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady asked what we did to preserve the right to trial by jury. We brought the backlog in the Crown court down from the level we inherited from the previous Labour Government. Prior to the pandemic, our record on the Crown court backlog was better than the previous...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c255
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a powerful argument in defence of jury trials. Members are rightly thinking about the impact on victims and defendants, but would he agree that the erosion of jury trial also has significant implications for the judiciary? In jury trials, for the public, the jury very...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c256
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is right on both points. As he was speaking, the Justice Secretary said from a sedentary position that he removed that clause. Perhaps he does not understand his own Bill. You are retaining judge-only trials for complex and lengthy cases, and retaining the power to use...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c256
House
House of Commons

Lucky you, Madam Deputy Speaker. I take that point.

The schedule 1 powers that I have talked about are a significant Henry VIII power. Under proposed statutory instrument powers, the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State will have the authority to add further categories of offences to schedule 1 by secondary...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc256-7
House
House of Commons

May I begin by welcoming the Justice Secretary to his place, and thank him for his engagement with me over recent weeks? More particularly, may I thank him for appointing Holly Lynch, the former Member of Parliament for Halifax, who apparently—goodness knows why—is still a big fan of me, despite...

Member
Karl Turner (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc257-8
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is talking about complex and lengthy trials. Has he considered the effect on the Court of Appeal of making those types of trial judge-only? If I have correctly understood the Government’s proposals, they wish to require a judge to give reasons for conviction. Juries need give no...

Member
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c258
House
House of Commons

The right hon. and learned Gentleman makes a very good point—of course it will. When a judge is required to give reasons, counsel for the by-then appellant is poring over the judge’s statement, looking at every single line. Clever people such as the very eminent King’s counsel, the right hon....

Member
Karl Turner (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c258
House
House of Commons

On appeals, if elected trials do not happen and cases are dealt with summarily, there is a good prospect that those appeals will also find their way into the Crown court. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that that would not allay the concerns that the Government want to address?

Member
Ayoub Khan (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c258
House
House of Commons

I agree completely, and the hon. Gentleman makes the point very strongly indeed.

Clause 6 is on magistrates’ sentencing powers. I cannot support the idea of magistrates having powers to give sentences of between 18 and 24 months without a credible plan to address the dire, desperate need to recruit magistrates,...

Member
Karl Turner (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c259
House
House of Commons

Just because a domestic abuser has no prior convictions, it does not mean he does not have priors. It does not mean he has good character.

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c259
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree with my hon. Friend. She is absolutely right, of course. In my experience, offenders who appear in incredibly serious cases of violence in domestic scenarios have often never had previous convictions.

Let us think about the fairness of this scenario. Defendant A, who has never been convicted of...

Member
Karl Turner (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c259
House
House of Commons

A longer sentence is the benefit.

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c259
House
House of Commons

I am hearing comments from a sedentary position. I have an awful lot of time for my hon. Friend the Member for Birmingham Yardley (Jess Phillips), I truly have—she is a mate of mine, as it happens—but there is a benefit to a jury trial.

The reality is that when a...

Member
Karl Turner (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc259-260
House
House of Commons

Is my hon. Friend aware of the Rape Crisis report that says that juries bring misconceptions and bias into the system and are less likely to convict? I am sure he is not talking about that being the benefit, is he?

Member
Emily Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c260
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to my hon. Friend for the intervention. I will be honest: I did not know about the report, but I am keen to have a look.

Member
Karl Turner (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c260
House
House of Commons

As I said in my opening speech, a number of women’s victims rights groups were the leading critics of getting rid of jury trials. We cannot make out that victims have a singular view on this and that they are happy with it. There are different opinions among victims groups,...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c260
House
House of Commons

None of them agree with you about the presumption of contact.

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c260
House
House of Commons

Well, I am not going to get into the whys and wherefores of this particular juncture of the debate.

There is an easy fix for the scenario that I have described. My amendment 47 states that where a defendant has no previous convictions and the court decides that the case is...

Member
Karl Turner (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc260-1
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c261
House
House of Commons

The entire criminal justice system is on the brink of collapse. We can all agree today that the current backlog in our Crown courts is unacceptable, untenable and unsustainable. The situation we face—a backlog sitting at over 80,000 cases and victims of rape waiting on average 424 days for their...

Member
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c261
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Madam Deputy Speaker.

Under Keir Starmer, this Government led us down a path towards curtailing jury trials, presenting it as the only way to deal with the backlog. That was despite widespread opposition from the legal profession and Parliament, including from their own Benches, and despite the absence of...

Member
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc261-3
House
House of Commons

I recognise the hon. Member’s enthusiasm for making the criminal courts work more efficiently, but I put to her a practical problem with the solution she proposes of courts starting at 9 o’clock in the morning—especially if we were not able to resolve the problem she identified of prisoners not...

Member
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c263
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. The right hon. and learned Member makes a really important point about the prisoner escort and custody services contract and ensuring that defendants are delivered to court on time, but not all defendants going into a Crown court are being held on remand. There are also defendants on bail...

Member
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc263-4
House
House of Commons

When I first put on my barrister’s robes and horse hair wig nearly 20 years ago, victims and defendants were not commonly waiting years for trial, victims of rape and serious sexual assault were not having their cases adjourned at the last minute multiple times, and it was not common...

Member
Catherine Atkinson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc264-5
House
House of Commons

Is there not another problem? Even if we had capacity at the magistrates courts, where trials would be taken away from the Crown courts, is not the elephant in the room that we do not have enough lawyers?

Member
Ayoub Khan (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c265
House
House of Commons

There’s loads around here!

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c265
House
House of Commons

While there are some lawyers on the Benches of this House, there are also many coming through the ranks; we need to ensure that they are going into the criminal justice system, and I am concerned that we are not seeing enough taking that path.

Accelerating reforms means accelerating the strain...

Member
Catherine Atkinson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc265-6
House
House of Commons

As the hon. Lady has just turned a page, I am confident that she will go on to the fact that, at the same time, the Government are proposing to remove the automatic right of appeal. If somebody has no legal background and cannot navigate a system that is totally...

Member
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c266
House
House of Commons

I am very conscious of the time available for this very important legislation, so I am turning the page to conclude.

To return to where I started, I welcome the Government’s commitment to bringing down the backlog. However, if we sweep the queue away from the steps of the Crown court...

Member
Catherine Atkinson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc266-7
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c267
House
House of Commons

I draw your attention, Madam Deputy Speaker, and the attention of the House to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests.

It has been a peculiar pleasure to listen to the two speeches made so far by Labour Back Benchers. Both the speech of the hon. Member for Kingston...

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc267-8
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c268
House
House of Commons

Because time is short, I will give way to the hon. Lady, but only she.

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c268
House
House of Commons

What the right hon. and learned Member is saying about the system being designed for the innocent is compelling, but the system is absolutely not designed for the person who is absolutely innocent in the system, and that is the victim. No part of the system asks them to elect...

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c268
House
House of Commons

That invites a long answer, which I do not have time now to give, but any defendant who appears before a court enjoys the presumption of innocence, and it is upon that basis that any system has to proceed. In England, the right has been accorded to those who enjoy...

Member
Geoffrey Cox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc268-9
House
House of Commons

I come to this debate with experience. I spent 15 years as a prosecutor, and during that time I was designated a sexual abuse prosecutor, which meant that I dealt with a great many cases involving sexual abuse and of course, domestic and other violence. I then defended cases, both...

Member
Yasmin Qureshi (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc269-270
House
House of Commons

I want to draw the House’s attention to new clause 22, which I have tabled with the hon. Member for Birmingham Yardley (Jess Phillips), my parliamentary neighbour, whose absence from the Government Front Bench is a matter of regret to all of us on the Conservative Benches. I thank both...

Member
Andrew Mitchell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc271-2
House
House of Commons

Clause 17 of the Bill—Jack and Paul’s law—fulfils my constituent Claire Throssell’s promise to her two beautiful boys after they were killed in a house fire set alight by their known domestically abusive father during a court-ordered contact visit. Claire promised her sons that no more children should lose their...

Member
Marie Tidball (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c272
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that it is staggering that the shadow Minister, the hon. Member for Bexhill and Battle (Dr Mullan), did not even mention amendment 67, tabled in his name, in his remarks?

Member
Kirith Entwistle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c272
House
House of Commons

I do indeed agree with my hon. Friend.

The Tories failed to act while they were in government, despite the fact that it was a Conservative Government who commissioned the harm report published in 2020. The report stated that

“the presumption should not remain in its present form”,

and recommended addressing its “detrimental...

Member
Marie Tidball (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc272-3
House
House of Commons

I make my contribution as someone who served as a magistrate for 20 years. I am deeply concerned about increasing magistrates’ sentencing powers to two years of custody. That must be accompanied by rigorous training, because in reality we get good and bad, and experienced and inexperienced, magistrates on magistrates’...

Member
Sarah Pochin (Reform UK)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c274
House
House of Commons

There are so many things in the Bill that I could talk about, but I shall start where my friend, the right hon. Member for the royal town of Sutton Coldfield (Sir Andrew Mitchell), left off; I am from the royal town of Birmingham Yardley. I want to get Members...

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc274-5
House
House of Commons

I draw the House’s attention to the fact that I am a member of the Bar of England and Wales, and my wife is an employment judge. Notwithstanding some noble and commendable elements, particularly in clauses 12 to 17, in totality, I am afraid that this is a bad Bill....

Member
Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc275-6
House
House of Commons

I think I am right in saying that a lay magistrate is required to sit 15 days a year. Very often, magistrates sit for a day at a time; they may do a day every other week. The scenario that the Government are presenting expects a lay magistrate to sit...

Member
Karl Turner (Independent (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c276
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman, as always, has his finger on the pulse on these issues. The Government’s proposals would narrow the pool of magistrates able to deal with these cases, by virtue of the time commitments that would be foisted on them.

I want to spend a little bit of time on...

Member
Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc276-7
House
House of Commons

I speak today as a victim of domestic abuse who has found going through the court system especially triggering and on behalf of constituents who have shared their harrowing experiences with me. One wrote to me and said that

“the system still allows a father to weaponise the child, to throw...

Member
Kirith Entwistle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc277-8
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for her bravery in sharing her powerful story and for highlighting how special measures do not work if people do not know that they available to them. During the Bill Committee, I argued that special measures should be there as standard, with people having the...

Member
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c278
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for that intervention. I agree that we should look for that to be the standard measure. I did ask for special measures, but when I turned up at court they were not implemented, so I had to walk past my perpetrator before going into the...

Member
Kirith Entwistle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc278-9
House
House of Commons

I start by expressing my relief that the Government are removing clause 3 from the Bill. I congratulate the Lord Chancellor on performing that U-turn so swiftly upon taking office.

In earlier debates, the Courts Minister said that curtailing the right to a jury trial was a good thing in any...

Member
Ashley Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc279-280
House
House of Commons

I want to raise three issues. Having been a magistrate for 20 years, I think that one of the things that has led to the problems has been the closure of so many courts across the estate. The potential to reopen some of those sites should be in the mix...

Member
Lee Barron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c280
House
House of Commons

Clause 17 would repeal the presumption of parental involvement contained in section 1(2A) of the Children Act 1989. That presumption currently provides that unless the contrary is shown, the involvement of each parent in the life of the child will further the child’s welfare. Amendment 67, tabled in the name...

Member
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c281
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Member not agree with the harm report commissioned by her party in government, which found, on the basis of the evidence, that this presumption creates a pro-contact culture, meaning that the voices of children are hidden and unheard? The evidence from Women’s Aid demonstrates that 68 children...

Member
Marie Tidball (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c281
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her intervention and for her powerful speech earlier. Ultimately, the impact assessment for this Bill says that there would be no impact, but I believe that the impact on families more broadly is not worth the change.

Member
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c281
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend points out, the impact assessment says that this particular measure, on its own, will not make any difference to the harm done to children, but we absolutely recognise that the checklist as a whole, and the way that it works, does need to be reformed. We...

Member
Kieran Mullan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c281
House
House of Commons

Exactly. I thank my hon. Friend for that intervention.

My concern is that, in some cases, clause 17 will increase the state’s power to erase one parent from a child’s life, and we know that that is often their father. It will rebalance the relationship between parents and the state.

5.45 pm

Member
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c281
House
House of Commons

Will the hon. Lady give way?

Member
Jess Phillips (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c281
House
House of Commons

No, I have already given way twice. I will not get any more time. I am very sorry.

We must avoid a situation in which the law views children as the state’s ultimate responsibility while parents must justify their involvement on a case-by-case basis. We must also avoid anything that presumes...

Member
Rebecca Smith (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc281-2
House
House of Commons

I will focus my remarks on clause 17 and the presumption of contact. My involvement in this issue started with a letter from a constituent—a mother trying to protect her child from an abusive ex-partner. In such cases, the court can play a role in retraumatising people, and can even...

Member
Josh Fenton-Glynn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc282-3
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c283
House
House of Commons

I draw attention to my declaration of interests: I am a solicitor. I continue to have two concerns about the Bill as drafted, and I am very grateful to the Government for changing their position on clause 3. I entirely agree with my hon. Friend the Member for Corby and...

Member
Sarah Russell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c283
House
House of Commons

We live in an era of problem solving, not point scoring. Indeed, as the Courts Minister, that has always been my focus. There is no bigger challenge in my portfolio than the unacceptable—indeed, intolerable—delays in our criminal courts, and that has always been the approach. To do politics is ultimately...

Member
Sarah Sackman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc283-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the Bill be now read the Third time.

Before I turn to the substance of this important Bill, let me recognise those who have helped bring it to this stage: those who have sat in the Chair, both in this Chamber and in Committee; the excellent...

Member
Alex Norris (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc299-303
House
House of Commons

Time and again, for more than a year now, Ministers have come to the Dispatch Box and told the House that their attack on jury trials was essential to making the courts work efficiently. Time and again we told them that they were wrong, and so did more than 100...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 cc303-4
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman mentioned that many in the legal profession are sounding the alarm about the perceived bias of juries. Will he please state which legal organisations have expressed that view to him?

Member
Jess Brown-Fuller (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c304
House
House of Commons

Had the hon. Lady listened, she would have heard that I said individual barristers—I did not say organisations. [Hon. Members: “Ah!”] The Justice Secretary and others ought to listen to those professionals who experience the justice system every day.

The Government’s handling of the Bill has been a shambles from start...

Member
Nick Timothy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
791 c305
House
House of Commons

Today, I am publishing the Government's response to the Competition and Markets Authority's (CMA) market study into the heating oil sector.

For the first time, families who rely on heating oil will benefit from stronger protections under Labour Government plans to regulate the sector for the first time. This Government...

Member
Polly Billington (Labour)
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written statements
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
HCWS366
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Business, Innovation, Science and Trade Committee
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
HC 130 2026-27
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend the Minister for Energy Consumers (Polly Billington) made the following Statement today:

Today, I am publishing the Government's response to the Competition and Markets Authority's (CMA) market study into the heating oil sector.

For the first time, families who rely on heating oil will benefit from stronger...

Member
Baroness Curran (Labour)
Department
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero
Type
Written statements
Date
13 October 2026
Reference
HLWS376
House
House of Lords

The UK Government and Competition and Markets Authority are proposing reforms to regulate veterinary practices and address the rising costs of veterinary bills.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
6 October 2026
Reference
CBP-12223

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 8 September 2026 to Question 23084 on Telecommunications Cables: Seas and Oceans, by what date does he expect each element of the new capability outlined to be operational in protecting critical underwater infrastructure.

Asked by
Ben Obese-Jecty (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 October 2026
Reference
28902
House
House of Commons

The government has announced a series of water reforms. Find out more about these plans and the next steps.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
1 October 2026
Reference
CBP-10998

To ask His Majesty's Government when they intend to publish a response to the second part of the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government’s consultation Strengthening leaseholder protections over charges and services.

Asked by
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 October 2026
Reference
HL3694
House
House of Lords

The National Lottery has raised over £53 billion for good causes since it began in 1994.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
25 September 2026
Reference
CBP-8744

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the potential risk of the proposed under-16 social media ban increasing children's exposure to misogynist and extremist rhetoric through migration to unregulated online spaces; and what steps her Department is taking to...

Asked by
Sarah Green (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 September 2026
Reference
19502
House
House of Commons

To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to ensure that consumers using artificial intelligence for financial planning receive appropriate safeguards against inaccurate or unsuitable advice.

Asked by
Lord Taylor of Warwick (Non-affiliated)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 September 2026
Reference
HL3375
House
House of Lords