Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,381 results for legtitle:"Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Commons Bill (HL) . Royal assent notified 19 July 2006. CHAP 26 2006

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
19 July 2006
Reference
449 c364
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
19 July 2006
Reference
CHAP 26 2006

Oh, it is my accent, my Lords. I am sorry.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1009
House
House of Lords

We too are very grateful. We brought forward an amendment on Third Reading with this in mind. The matter has been clarified by the description as councils. It is a considerable move forward and a tribute to the ministerial team and its advisers that they have seen the wisdom of...

Member
Lord Livsey of Talgarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1007
House
House of Lords

I can. I can also say that it was the former ministerial team who should be thanked for all this good work. On Question, Motion agreed to. "27: Page 15, line 27, after ““common”” insert ““(and in particular persons exercising rights of common)””"

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1008
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House does agree with the Commons in the said amendment. Amendment No. 27 addresses concerns that less weight might be given to representations from commoners actively exercising their rights where they are fewer than those who are not exercising their rights. That...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1008
House
House of Lords

My Lords, some members of the commons associations will be disappointed that this amendment is being rejected as there is cohesion among active commoners on how matters can be considered, especially in establishing new commons councils. The noble Lord, Lord Williams of Elvel, is unable to be here this afternoon,...

Member
Lord Livsey of Talgarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1008
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are also happy with these amendments, particularly those relating to the definition of local inhabitants and inserting, "““the inhabitants of any locality, or of any neighbourhood within a locality””." We are satisfied with that wording and thank the Minister for bringing these amendments forward. On Question, Motion...

Member
Lord Livsey of Talgarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1006
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 13 to 16. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. "17: Clause 24, page 13, line 29, after ““Schedule 1”” insert-" ““(ba) paragraph 1A or 1B of Schedule 2””

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1006
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendment No. 17. In moving this Motion, I shall speak also to Amendments Nos. 19 and 119 to 131. Amendment No. 17 is essentially a consequential amendment to Amendment No. 119, which enables additions...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1006-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 18 to 20. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. "21: Clause 26, page 15, line 5, leave out ““association”” and insert ““council””""22: Page 15, line 6, leave out ““association”” and...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1007
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 21 to 26. I shall speak to them and to Amendments Nos. 28 to 79, 100 and 101, 106, 108, 110 to 112, 114 and 132. These amendments change the name of...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1007
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for coming back on this matter. We had long discussions on it at earlier stages of the Bill, but it was only at Third Reading that the difficulty of commons association was raised in full, so I am very pleased to note...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1007
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that this House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 1 to 4. Amendment No. 1 is consequential because of amendments to Schedule 2, to which we shall turn later. It has no immediate effect on the exempted commons, but we shall...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1003-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 5 to 12. Amendments Nos. 5 and 8 to 12 respond to concerns raised by the noble Baroness, Lady Byford, at Third Reading that land on which houses had recently been built...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1004-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Commons amendments be now considered. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. [The page and line references are to Bill 115 as first printed for the Commons.]"1: Clause 5, page 3, line 1, leave out paragraph (c)""2: Clause 7, page 3,...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1003
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing this batch of amendments. Taking them in reverse order, we had a long debate about ““rural inhabitants””, which was the crux of the matter at that stage. I am happy to accept the wording before us today, which will include urban inhabitants...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1005
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure whether I am allowed simply to thank the Minister for explaining that. We were merely seeking clarification. On Question, Motion agreed to. "95: Clause 43, page 25, line 4, at end insert-""““(4A) Where-" (a) any land was at any time before the commencement of...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1018
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 95 and 96. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. "97: Clause 44, page 25, line 17, leave out subsection (2) and insert-""““(2) A national authority may for any purpose specified...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1018-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the House do agree with the Commons in their Amendments Nos. 87 to 89. Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to. "90: Clause 42, page 24, line 9, leave out ““at the commencement of this section””""91: Page 24, line 11, after ““Metropolitan...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 July 2006
Reference
684 c1015
House
House of Lords