Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 July 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
My Lords, I thank the Minister for introducing this batch of amendments. Taking them in reverse order, we had a long debate about ““rural inhabitants””, which was the crux of the matter at that stage. I am happy to accept the wording before us today, which will include urban inhabitants locally as much as rural inhabitants. I am grateful for that. In another place, my honourable friend Jim Paice raised the issue covered in Amendment No. 10, and the wording we have before us should cover his concerns. It would have been a shame not to have clarified how far a development must have gone to be established as a development. I am grateful to the Minister for his explanation of these amendments and we are happy to support them.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 684 c1005
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Construction Common land Housing Fees and charges Land Driving Exemptions Land use Ownership Motor vehicles Payments National Trust Registration Sports Rights of way Repairs and maintenance Rivers Dartmoor Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:03:49 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338139
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338139
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_338139