Skip to main content

1-20 of 378 results for legtitle:"Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Public acts
Date
16 December 2010
Reference
CHAP 35 2010

Finance (No.2) Bill (CHAP 33); Equitable Life (Payments) Bill; (CHAP 34); Local Government Bill; (CHAP 35); Savings Accounts and Health in Pregnancy Grant Bill; (CHAP 36); Superannuation Bill (CHAP 37); Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Bill (CHAP 38). Royal Assent notified 16 December 2010.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
16 December 2010
Reference
520 c1078
House
House of Commons

Local Government Bill (HL). Returned from the Commons agreed to.

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
722 c1260
House
House of Lords

I urge the hon. Gentleman to look at the impact assessment. He is right that the cost of implementing unitary status in Norwich and Exeter is around £40 million, but the savings over that same period work out at £39.4 million, so the net cost of implementation is only £600,000,...

Member
Chris Williamson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c493
House
House of Commons

I have some sympathy for the Minister, who is having to try to justify the Government's position on the Bill. Essentially, as he knows, he is trying to defend the indefensible. He knows that unitary councils are far more efficient than the two-tier model that he seeks to retain, and...

Member
Chris Williamson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c488
House
House of Commons

On the contrary, it is clearing up an act of partisan manoeuvring by the previous Government, who abandoned their own criteria. It is worth remembering that a previous Labour Secretary of State, the right hon. Member for Salford and Eccles (Hazel Blears), concluded that neither the Exeter bid nor the...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c495
House
House of Commons

If this is not an argument against the merits or demerits of unitary councils, it would seem that the Minister has inadvertently conceded that this is an act of political spite.

Member
Chris Williamson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c495
House
House of Commons

I do not wish to detain the House for long on Third Reading, because much was said on Second Reading and in Committee and we have covered the issues. However, I wanted to update the House on the Norwich and Norfolk situation. The hon. Member for Derby North (Chris Williamson)...

Member
Brandon Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c492
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman helps me to make my point: just think how much we could save if we did not have the up-front costs of a top-down, forced unitary authority. In Norfolk, local authorities and the county council are working together to find ways of sharing services and to make...

Member
Brandon Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c493
House
House of Commons

The fact is that there will be cuts as a result of the decisions being taken by the Government, who are in charge of funding for local councils, but the Opposition do not accept that it is necessary to make cuts on the scale that is being proposed. As for...

Member
Chris Williamson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c492
House
House of Commons

How does the Minister respond to the point that the impact assessment concluded that there would be ongoing savings of £6.5 million per year? Surely that is an example of good value for money, and it would be brought about by creating unitary councils in Norwich and Exeter.

Member
Chris Williamson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c495
House
House of Commons

I am glad that the hon. Gentleman raises the impact assessment, which I was going to come to, because throughout this debate Labour Members have singularly failed to understand how the impact assessment operated. First, it set out and commented on the costs and savings by reference to the previous...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c495-6
House
House of Commons

With the leave of the House, I briefly reply to the debate. I congratulate the hon. Member for Derby North (Chris Williamson) on a remarkable display of political chutzpah. I kept my opening speech brief not because I am embarrassed by the Bill—I am not remotely embarrassed by it—but because...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c494-5
House
House of Commons

I promise that I will not trouble the hon. Gentleman again, but how can he stack up the comments that he made earlier about making savings in back-office functions, and therefore making people redundant, with his comments now about trying to prevent cuts in the public sector?

Member
Chris Heaton-Harris (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c492
House
House of Commons

I agree with my right hon. Friend: what the hon. Member for Norwich South (Simon Wright), who represents one of the cities affected, says is astonishing. It is even more incredible given that the Liberal Democrat party in the hon. Gentleman's home city supports unitary status for the city. I...

Member
Chris Williamson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c491
House
House of Commons

Is it not absolutely astonishing that the hon. Member for Norwich South (Simon Wright) is not aware of the figures in his own Government's impact assessment? They show quite clearly that there will be net savings within six years and then savings of £6.5 million every year. Those are not...

Member
Ben Bradshaw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c491
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman should not get too hung up on the issue of councillors. I explained that reducing their numbers represented not one of the main savings, but just one of the savings. If the hon. Gentleman looks at the impact assessment that was carried out at the time, he...

Member
Chris Williamson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c491
House
House of Commons

What is the hon. Gentleman's assessment of the savings that would be produced by reducing the number of councillors? He said early in his speech that that was one of the main savings. I ask that particularly as the shadow boards that were set up paid considerable salaries to councillors...

Member
Simon Wright (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c491
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend the Member for Derby North (Chris Williamson) said, this is a sad day for two of our great, historic English cities. I was brought up in one of them—Norwich—and I have represented the other in the House since 1997. The Government's measures will not be lost...

Member
Ben Bradshaw (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c493-4
House
House of Commons

Does it follow, then, that it is the official Opposition's policy that there should be unitary authorities across the country?

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 November 2010
Reference
519 c488
House
House of Commons