Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 25 November 2010. It occurred during Debate on bill on Local Government Bill [Lords].
Local Government Bill [Lords]
On the contrary, it is clearing up an act of partisan manoeuvring by the previous Government, who abandoned their own criteria. It is worth remembering that a previous Labour Secretary of State, the right hon. Member for Salford and Eccles (Hazel Blears), concluded that neither the Exeter bid nor the Norwich bid met the value-for-money test that she had set herself. Was she acting out of political spite? I rather doubt it. It was also concluded that the Norwich bid was questionable on the affordability test. So the Labour party set out certain criteria, but these proposals did not meet them, and it then completely changed its tune. It is the ultimate hypocrisy, therefore, for Labour Members to accuse the Government of having changed their stance; it is they who have been so inconsistent that the High Court overturned their attempted gerrymandering.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 519 c495
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devon Exeter Local government Norwich Reorganisation Unitary councils Suffolk
- Legislation
- Local Government Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 18:32:16 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_685882
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_685882
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_685882