Skip to main content

1-20 of 22 results for legtitle:"Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2010"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

That the draft orders laid before the House on 11 January be approved. Relevant documents: 6th report from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, considered in Grand Committee on 9 February. Motion agreed.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 February 2010
Reference
717 c1017
House
House of Lords

Draft Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2010. Draft Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2010. Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question (formal).

Lead member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
24 February 2010
Reference
717 c1017
House
House of Lords

Draft Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2010, draft Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2010; draft Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2010; draft Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Covert Surveillance and Property Interference: Code of Practice) Order 2010; draft Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Covert Human Intelligence Sources:...

Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
23 February 2010
Reference
506 c269
House
House of Commons

Draft Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2010; draft Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2010. Considered by Delegated Legislation Committee. Agreed to on question.

Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Date
10 February 2010
Reference
10th DLC
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 24/02/2010 from Lord McKenzie of Luton to Lord Oakeshott regarding the Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2010 and the Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2010. 3 p.

Deposited by
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Deposited papers
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
DEP2010-0570
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords for their contributions. I am not sure that I heard from either noble Lord who spoke whether they support the orders.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c181GC
House
House of Lords

I would prefer to do that because they are quite technical points—certainly those relating to the total value of contingency assets and an update on pre-pack schemes. Around the whole issue of buyouts, buy-ins and the raft of arrangements that may be in place, the market has generally cooled during...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c183GC
House
House of Lords

I am delighted to hear that. A number of quite technical questions were raised and I shall to try to deal with as many of them as I can. On some, I shall definitely have to follow up. The noble Lord, Lord Freud, talked about the mismanagement of the economy,...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c181-2GC
House
House of Lords

Yes, we do.

Member
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c181GC
House
House of Lords

That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2010.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c176GC
House
House of Lords

It is possibly still not crystal-clear to the Minister. Is it the whole year compared with the previous year, as opposed to a month? The percentage cannot have moved from 3.5 to 0.9 over those three months. Something is still not quite clear, I think.

Member
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c182GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I remind the noble Lord that we are straying somewhat from the orders. Pretty much every time that we have talked about regulation and its scope, his party has argued for less onerous regulation across the banking system and across a whole range of other areas. The noble...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c182GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before I explain these orders, noble Lords may find it helpful if I say a little about the work of the PPF in the year since we last debated these orders. As noble Lords are aware, the Pension Protection Fund protects members of defined-benefit occupational pension schemes and...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c177-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an annual event. I think that that we last discussed these orders about 10 and a half months ago. I am not going to make a party-political broadcast but, as the noble Lord, Lord Freud, said, this is an appropriate opportunity to ask one or two...

Member
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c180-1GC
House
House of Lords

On several of those points, I should be quite happy to have a written answer, if that suits the Minister.

Member
Lord Oakeshott of Seagrove Bay (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c183GC
House
House of Lords

I am sorry; it is for a whole year period. I will write to the noble Lord specifically to confirm that, but that is why. The noble Lord asked about the PPF’s assessment, which was over 25 years but is now to be over 20 years. To be clear, the...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c182-3GC
House
House of Lords

I cannot let that pass. The mismanagement encompasses the whole period, not just the period of rescue. Running an economy at a level of gearing in both the private and the banking sector, which is what has happened, has left us in a much worse position than that of the...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c182GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, these are pretty standard uprating orders but they give us an opportunity to discuss a consequence of Labour’s great recession that is often overlooked. When a company goes into insolvency, an employee does not just lose his job and his salary; he is also in danger of losing...

Member
Lord Freud (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c179-80GC
House
House of Lords

Draft Occupational Pension Schemes (Levy Ceiling) Order 2010 and the draft Pension Protection Fund (Pension Compensation Cap) Order 2010. Lords debate on motions to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Lead member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Answering member
Lord Freud
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
9 February 2010
Reference
717 c176-83GC
House
House of Lords

Moved By That the draft orders and regulations be referred to a Grand Committee. Motions agreed.

Member
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2010
Reference
717 c307
House
House of Lords