Skip to main content

1-20 of 254 results for member:"Lord Bridges"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, the timetable for the start of IER was agreed with the Scottish Government and allowed the referendum to take place before IER got under way. There is no legal requirement to consult on this order, and electoral registration is at present within the competence of the UK Government....

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 October 2015
Reference
765 cc1123-5
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord O’Neill of Gatley on 30 July (HL1654), whether HM Revenue and Customs has target times by which members of the public can reasonably expect to get through on the telephone and speak to an official; and by what...

Asked by
Lord Quirk (Crossbench)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 September 2015
Reference
HL2014
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether decisions on the next Comprehensive Spending Review will be taken before the outcome of the next Strategic Defence and Security Review.

Asked by
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 September 2015
Reference
HL1945
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord has made some very important points. I am not sure, strictly speaking—

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1093
House
House of Lords

I wish to comment briefly on the remarks made by the noble and learned Lord. He touches on some extremely important points. Just how permissible it is for us to comment on arrangements proposed for the other House, I am not sure, but I would suggest that the two points...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 July 2009
Reference
712 c1093
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what action they will take regarding those prisoners released from Guantanamo Bay who return to the United Kingdom.

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c415GC
House
House of Lords

On hearing President Obama’s decision to close the interrogation centre at Guantanamo, I was pleased that that courageous and difficult step had been taken. It is of course against the principles of our own legal system for a citizen to be indefinitely imprisoned without charge. It is specifically contrary to...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c416-7GC
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what action they will take regarding those prisoners released from Guantanamo Bay who return to the United Kingdom.

Lead member
Lord Bridges
Answering member
Lord West of Spithead
Department
Home Office
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c415-25GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may be allowed a few concluding words. I thank all who have spoken, particularly the noble Lord, Lord West, for his thoughtful and thorough reply. There is a tendency, which I hope we have avoided, to adopt a tone of high moralistic disapproval of what has happened. We...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 June 2009
Reference
711 c425GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as somebody who lives very close to salt marshes and mudflats, I say that the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, is right. They are not easily classifiable and need careful assessment by people who know about these things before a decision is made about how valuable a commodity they...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 June 2009
Reference
711 c60
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I spoke previously on a matter of particular interest to me that seems relevant in this context: the protection of archaeological remains on the seabed. I referred to an article in British Archaeology, a serious academic magazine, which revealed that the Ministry of Defence had sold the contents...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 May 2009
Reference
710 c1317-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 19 incorporates the care of archaeological articles found on the seabed among the responsibilities of the Secretary of State. I should explain that I am not a professional archaeologist in any sense. My interest was first aroused when, as a student at Oxford, the all-embracing curriculum of...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
710 c469-71
House
House of Lords

Clause 3: Performance Amendment 19 19: Clause 3, page 2, line 40, at end insert— "( ) These objectives should include the protection of items of archaeological interest on the seabed."

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
710 c469
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his interesting remarks and for the sympathetic attitude that he has shown to the subject. I should make it clear that under existing law—I refer in particular to HMS "Victory"—although HMS "Victory" was in international waters, the fact that it was a British...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 May 2009
Reference
710 c477
House
House of Lords

My Lords, briefly, I support what my noble friend Lord Ramsbotham has just said. The issue of the Chagos islanders is very serious, and attention has been drawn to it by the use of the former British territory as a base for rendition flights. This is a subject of great...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2009
Reference
709 c1090
House
House of Lords

If I may be so bold as to refer to an earlier stage in our discussions, this debate makes evident that the responsibilities entrusted to the MMO will be very considerable. I wonder whether the MMO will have sufficient resources to have this very broad remit, not only in relation...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
709 c866
House
House of Lords

The Minister kindly referred to Clause 112, "Interpretation of this Part". Perhaps I may add a brief comment on that clause. I am a little surprised to see that the interpretation refers largely to British vessels. As has been made clear from the recent reference to the wreck of HMS...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c646-7
House
House of Lords

I welcome what the Minister has just said about the protection of the marine environment in this clause. I referred at Second Reading to the anxieties that we have about certain offshore things that occur without any governmental control, in particular the searching for wrecks of historic ships. I hope...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2009
Reference
708 c639
House
House of Lords

I make a brief intervention arising from local knowledge. I am attracted by paragraph (e), on ““heritage and marine archaeology””, of the proposed new subsection. Living on the east coast of England I am extremely aware of the number of predators who come from hundreds of miles away to dig...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 January 2009
Reference
706 c1691
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may add a word to reflect a different point of view. I am a trustee of a charitable trust which had some money on deposit with a firm in London that was controlled by Landsbanki. We have succeeded in preventing this money being transferred against the wishes of...

Member
Lord Bridges (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 January 2009
Reference
706 c1125
House
House of Lords