Proceeding contribution from Lord Bridges (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 1 June 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].
Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]
My Lords, as somebody who lives very close to salt marshes and mudflats, I say that the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, is right. They are not easily classifiable and need careful assessment by people who know about these things before a decision is made about how valuable a commodity they are. Like him, I do not think that there is a great deal to be said in favour of the amendment.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 711 c60
- Session
- 2008-09
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Access Birds Coastal areas Devolution Crown dependencies British overseas territories Cycling Coastal erosion Land Leisure Gun sports Environment protection Exemptions Horse riding Isle of Man Gibraltar Internet International law Estuaries Local government Ownership Parking Planning permission Planning Ports Privacy Public transport Maps Public footpaths Nature conservation Parish and town councils National parks Public inquiries Safety Rights of way Seas and oceans Wildlife Planning Inspectorate Jersey Guernsey Natural England
- Legislation
- Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
- National Parks and Access to the Countryside Act 1949
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:42:34 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_562228
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_562228
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_562228