Proceeding contribution from Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Company Law Reform Bill [HL].
Company Law Reform Bill [HL]
My Lords, I shall not repeat everything that the noble Baroness said about our thanks for how the Government have responded to the concerns expressed in Committee. We now have a workable series of clauses that respond to our original concerns. Although my name is not attached to Amendment No. 391A, the issue that remains—albeit one for which there should be an explanation—is from what point in time the damage accrues. In these sorts of cases, we will be dealing with loss or profit, which may continue over a long period—for example, if an audit mistake is made at point X but the claim is that the profits or losses occurred sometime after that. An explanation of that will be very valuable.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 682 c159-60
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disciplinary proceedings Disclosure of information Audit Accountancy Company law Company accounts Companies Liability EU law Documents Exemptions Internet Qualifications Staff Public records Private companies Registration Shares Shareholders
- Legislation
- Company Law Reform Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 00:57:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322166
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322166
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_322166