Skip to main content

1-20 of 87 results for member:"Lord Tombs"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, today’s debate has already shown how complicated is the proposal for mercy killing—for that is what we are discussing. The desire to relieve seemingly unbearable suffering is understandable and even praiseworthy, but the means chosen may involve even more suffering for others, whose vulnerability may not be immediately...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 July 2014
Reference
755 cc815-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by apologising for my late arrival by a few minutes. I came rather a long way and the transport was not quite up to scratch.

I start by saying that I am opposed to assisted dying—as I think is well known—which has monopolised the discussion today, although...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2013
Reference
750 cc947-883
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the Minister will expect, I found that Answer wholly unsatisfactory. We are in the early stages of a major crisis. At present, a lot of our supply comes from nuclear and coal stations, which provide about 40% of our national demand, with the rest coming from gas. Much of this plant is 40 years old and quite a lot of it is 50 years old—well beyond the date by which one would have expected it to have been retired. The task of replacing it is enormous and will take a long time. We ought not to feel complacent at all, because estimating the date of the necessary retirement of this plant is not easy. Can she assure me that the dates and programmes for the retirement of 40 or 50 year-old plant are clearly specified, together with plans for replacing it?

Asked by
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2012
Reference
740 c992
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what steps they are taking in response to the recent projection by Ofgem of a fall in the generating plant margin from 14% at present to 4% in the next four years.

Asked by
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
7 November 2012
Reference
740 cc992-4
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their estimate of the total subsidy to be provided for wind power for the period 2000–2050.

Asked by
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 November 2011
Reference
13227; 732 c154-5WA
House
House of Lords

My Lords, after eight years of annual debates during the past decade on the lack of strategy in the privatised electricity supply industry, common sense has prevailed. Those debates criticised the lack of any commitment to nuclear power, the failure to provide for replacement of ageing power stations, the growing...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 November 2009
Reference
715 c293-4
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that reply but it does not actually address my Question, which is the capacity expected to be withdrawn by 2025. The reason for asking this Question is the age-related nature of the problem. The great bulk of our power stations are more than 40 years old now and will fail over the next few years due to age. Would the Minister agree that it seems inevitable that for the next 10 years or so we will build nothing but gas-fired power stations so increasing our reliance on imported gas, from sometimes dubious sources?
Asked by
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 April 2009
Reference
709 c1176
House
House of Lords
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what capacity of coal, oil and nuclear power stations is expected to be withdrawn from service by 2025; and what plans have been made for their replacement.
Asked by
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
2 April 2009
Reference
709 c1175-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by reminding noble Lords that this amendment is about the use of human-animal embryos, and the proposal is that they should not be used if reasonable alternatives are available. The debate has rather turned into a conception of the amendment as an attack on all embryonic...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2008
Reference
704 c1613-4
House
House of Lords

I am reluctant to prolong this very informative discussion, but there are one or two points that I want to make in favour of the amendment. I, too, have been greatly impressed by a number of debates on ethical issues in this House during the past 17 years or so....

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c273-4
House
House of Lords

I shall not go into them, because they would provoke further argument and extend the discussion to no useful end, but I shall select one. The Nuffield Council does wonderful work, but it has strong science links and is supported by the Wellcome Foundation, which is a medical research charity...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 December 2007
Reference
697 c274
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as has been said, the first inquiry by the Select Committee on Science and Technology was published in March 1999—eight and a half years ago. In the subsequent years, Government have shown a mixture of procrastination, indecision and, most importantly, a failure to grasp the nature of the...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1231-3
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to call attention to issues facing the electricity supply industry and to the case for a strategic decision mechanism. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Tombs
Answering member
Lord Truscott
Department
Department of Trade and Industry
Type
Debates
Date
8 February 2007
Reference
689 c792-821
House
House of Lords

rose to call attention to issues facing the electricity supply industry and to the case for a strategic decision mechanism; and to move for Papers. The noble Lord said: My Lords, this is the fifth annual debate on the subject, and the problems which initiated the series remain unaddressed and...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2007
Reference
689 c792-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as usual, we have had a stimulating and wide-ranging debate, and I want to pick up one or two points that particularly seem to call for comment. First, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Ford, for her contribution and I congratulate her on her antecedents, which are of...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2007
Reference
689 c820-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I want to associate myself with the remarks made by my noble friend Lord Alton, who stole most of my points and made them much more eloquently than I could have done, so I am grateful to him. Since I am not going to repeat them, I...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 October 2006
Reference
685 c718
House
House of Lords
My Lords, I thank the Minister for that helpful reply. The Question has been phrased in identical terms to one I asked two years ago and the Answer has been similarly phrased—with identical figures, which I find surprising and slightly disappointing. Can he confirm, first, that the figures, in particular for the period to 2020, take account of the rapidly escalating costs for offshore wind? Secondly, do the figures include the costs of transmission from the offshore wind conglomerates to the national grid?
Asked by
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 May 2006
Reference
682 c9-10
House
House of Lords
What is their current estimate of the total cumulative cost to electricity consumers of Her Majesty’s Government’s renewable energy strategy, assuming that the target for 2010 and the aspiration for 2020 are both met.
Asked by
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
15 May 2006
Reference
682 c9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, terminally ill people are vulnerable people—afraid and apprehensive of approaching death and the manner of its arrival. They are very sensitive to suggestion and there is no shortage of potential coercive influences, some apparent, some less so. Most insidious is the atmosphere created by the environment in which...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 May 2006
Reference
681 c1211-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for that reply. It is not my task to summarise the discussion, but I congratulate noble Lords who have taken part on the standard of discussion. It has been an excellent debate. The absence of old friends has been offset very thoroughly by the acquisition of...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2006
Reference
680 c1208
House
House of Lords