Skip to main content

1-20 of 108 results for subject:"Army Prosecuting Authority"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

asked Her Majesty's Government:Whether they will place in the Library of the House the report by HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate following its inspection of the Army Prosecuting Authority in February and March 2007.

Asked by
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 February 2008
Reference
1742; 699 c57-8WA
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Attorney General
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 February 2008
Reference
DEP2008-0462
House
House of Commons
The Army Prosecuting Authority has to look at the evidence before it and decide whether a prosecution is able to take place with witnesses who can give effective evidence to secure that prosecution. If the evidential test is not passed, the prosecutors will not take the case forward; if it is passed, they can take it forward. They will then have to consider public interest issues. My hon. Friend appears to be talking about the evidential test. I am happy to discuss the issues with him further, but it seems from what he says that the evidential test was not passed.
Answered by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
24 May 2007
Reference
460 c1426
House
House of Commons
The Army Prosecuting Authority dropped a case against British soldiers, despite lots of evidence having been on worldwide TV, saying that it had happened more than six months before. It claimed in its press release that the same applied to the civil authorities. Can the Solicitor-General confirm that if a thug beats someone up and lies low for six months, he will not be prosecuted despite the evidence? Is that the law, or has the Army Prosecuting Authority got it wrong?
Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
24 May 2007
Reference
460 c1426
House
House of Commons
Both the CPS and the armed service prosecutors will apply the same evidential test—namely, whether there is enough evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction—and then decide whether there is a public interest in prosecuting. In the case of the armed service prosecutors, that includes the service interest.
Answered by
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
24 May 2007
Reference
460 c1426
House
House of Commons
What assessment he has made of consistency of prosecution policy between the Army Prosecuting Authority and the Crown Prosecution Service.
Asked by
Harry Cohen (Labour)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
24 May 2007
Reference
460 c1426; 138946
House
House of Commons

asked Her Majesty's Government:In connection with the recent acquittal of six defendants at the court martial arising from the death in Basra in 2003 of Mr Baha Mousa and related matters (a) what assessments were made and by whom of the likelihood of conviction on each charge; and what record...

Asked by
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 March 2007
Reference
2723; 690 c256WA
House
House of Lords

In the cases of Sergeant Selman and others recently acquitted at court martial, whether any communication passed directly or indirectly between the prosecuting authority and the Law Officers in connection with these cases.

Asked by
Lord Astor of Hever (Conservative)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 June 2006
Reference
6212; 683 c155WA
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that I will not be so charitable towards the statement, but that is perhaps because, as a former soldier, I know too well the effects that delay and such investigations have on the morale of soldiers, their families and units—especially those in the front line. The Solicitor-General...

Member
Ben Wallace (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c734
House
House of Commons

It is important that whenever we look at a case involving our soldiers engaged in active service areas, such as Iraq, we take into account the precise circumstances in which they are operating. When making a decision, we need to take into account the threat that soldiers may feel under...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c734
House
House of Commons

In my hon. and learned Friend’s statement he said that there were ““inconsistencies”” in the accounts provided by the soldiers. Does he recognise that there are always inconsistencies in statements given by witnesses? If there are no inconsistencies, the witnesses are deemed to have colluded before giving their evidence. It...

Member
Brian Jenkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c735
House
House of Commons

There was, regrettably, an allegation of improper behaviour. The independent Iraqi civilian who made some allegations put forward a version of events that did not include the shooting of Sergeant Roberts, but did suggest that the behaviour of the troopers involved had not been appropriate. That was discovered at a...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c735
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Solicitor-General for his meticulous care in warning us of the statement that he has made today, and for its tone and content. He is right to say that our soldiers are not, and should never be, immune from prosecution. They are subject to the rule...

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c734
House
House of Commons

The presence or otherwise of the protective jacket is a matter for the Ministry of Defence and others, and it did not have any substantial bearing on the legal decisions. In terms of the lawyers’ examination of the evidence, the issue was whether the soldiers had acted appropriately and whether...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c733
House
House of Commons

As a former soldier, I share in the tributes paid to our servicemen and women who represent our country abroad. They do a difficult job. I also share the thoughts for the families who face pressures when servicemen or women are abroad. I draw the attention of the Solicitor-General to...

Member
Tobias Ellwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c735-6
House
House of Commons

It is important that families are given as much information as is reasonable as early as possible and that the information is accurate, which means that there must be some degree of investigation of it. We have already heard from my hon. Friend the Member for Tamworth (Mr. Jenkins) that...

Member
Mike O'Brien (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c736
House
House of Commons

I had the privilege of visiting Iraq in June 2003 as part of the armed forces parliamentary scheme. During our time there, I spent nearly 24 hours with the 2nd Royal Tank Regiment. I ate with the soldiers, talked to them and went on patrol with them in a Challenger...

Member
Richard Younger-Ross (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c736
House
House of Commons

Let me begin by echoing the Solicitor-General’s expressions of sympathy for the family of Sergeant Roberts, and indeed for that of Mr. Zaher, in this tragic series of events. I thank the Solicitor-General for early sight of his statement—all the more because the first indication I had that the statement...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c728-30
House
House of Commons

I share the expressions of sympathy to Mrs. Roberts and the other members of Sergeant Roberts’ family. I welcome the fact that the Solicitor-General said that investigations into incidents such as this will be conducted much more speedily in the future, and I am sure that we are all glad...

Member
Dan Rogerson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c733
House
House of Commons

As the Solicitor-General will know, Mrs. Roberts is a constituent of mine. All our thoughts go out to her and her family at what has obviously been an incredibly distressing time. I welcome the Solicitor-General’s statement, particularly his saying that there will be no prosecution of the soldiers involved. As...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2006
Reference
445 c732-3
House
House of Commons