Proceeding contribution from Ben Wallace (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 27 April 2006. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Fatal Shootings (Iraq).
Fatal Shootings (Iraq)
I am afraid that I will not be so charitable towards the statement, but that is perhaps because, as a former soldier, I know too well the effects that delay and such investigations have on the morale of soldiers, their families and units—especially those in the front line. The Solicitor-General said that the case was started because it might have been perceived that British soldiers shot an unarmed civilian. However, at the end of his statement he said that if there is an allegation of wrongdoing and supporting evidence following an investigation, charges will be brought. Is it not the case that there was not actually an allegation of wrongdoing in this case, but that yet again commanding officers and units in the front line—who know the environment, as did the local Army Legal Services staff—were overruled for reasons of perception, not reasons of correct justice?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c734
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal investigation Death Armed conflict Crown Prosecution Service Civilians Iraq Prosecutions Peacekeeping operations Military police Iraq conflict Army Prosecuting Authority Roberts, Steven Zaher, Zaher
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:45:23 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317933
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317933
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_317933