Skip to main content

1-14 of 14 results for subject:"Chequebook journalism"

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Answered by
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 April 1998
Reference
589 c385-8
House
House of Lords
1st supplementary on harassment by journalists of Mary Bell and her daughter and welcoming intervention of Lord Wakeham regarding cheque-book journalism.
Asked by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 April 1998
Reference
589 c385-8
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 April 1998
Reference
589 c385-8
House
House of Lords
What discussions they have held with book and newspaper publishers and radio and television companies about payment to convicted criminals for memoirs and related material concerning their criminal past.
Asked by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
30 April 1998
Reference
589 c385-8
House
House of Lords

Journalistic Corrupt Practices Bill. Second reading debate. Adjourned. To be resumed 12 July.

Lead member
Lord Davies of Stamford
Answering member
Iain Sproat
Department
Department of National Heritage
Type
Debates on bills
Date
10 May 1996
Reference
277 c605-8
House
House of Commons

Journalistic corrupt practices. Ten minute rule motion for leave to introduce a Bill. Agreed to on question. Presentation and first reading (Bill 61 1995/96). To be read a second time on 10 May.

Lead member
Lord Davies of Stamford
Type
Debates on bills
Date
20 February 1996
Reference
272 c189-92
House
House of Commons
Member
Lord Davies of Stamford (Conservative)
Type
Ten minute rule bills
Notes
Received 19.03.96
Date
20 February 1996
Reference
Bill 61 1995/96
House
House of Commons

Lords debate on motion to call attention to the case for statutory limitation on the use of cheque-book journalism. Motion withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Dixon-Smith
Answering member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern
Department
Lord Chancellor's Department
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
20 December 1995
Reference
567 c1642-70
House
House of Lords
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 1995
Reference
268 c15-6
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 1995
Reference
268 c18
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
4 December 1995
Reference
268 c18
House
House of Commons
What recent assessment AG has made of adequacy of establishment of Dept for efficient conduct of its business. -
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 1995
Reference
268 c18; 1892
House
House of Commons
1st supplementary on delays in consideration of contempt proceedings against those involved in Harrow case in which a trial was aborted because ofnewspaper publicity.
Asked by
Andrew Mackinlay (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 1995
Reference
268 c18
House
House of Commons
Supplementary on pre-trial agreements between witnesses and newspapers.
Asked by
Lord Morris of Aberavon (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
4 December 1995
Reference
268 c15-6
House
House of Commons