Oral question asked in the House of Commons, by Andrew Mackinlay (Labour). It was answered on Monday, 4 December 1995 on behalf of the Attorney General.
Attorney General
- Question
- 1st supplementary on delays in consideration of contempt proceedings against those involved in Harrow case in which a trial was aborted because ofnewspaper publicity.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 268 c18
- Session
- 1995-96
- Oral question type
- 1st Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Criminal proceedings Journalism Newspaper press Trials Contempt of court Chequebook journalism
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2014-09-02 02:27:40 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_313243/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_313243/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_313243/-question