Skip to main content

1-20 of 163 results for subject:"Chote, Robert"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I want to begin by putting on record the Opposition’s endorsement of Sir Robert Chote’s appointment as chair of the UK Statistics Authority, and to echo the sentiment made by members of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee in wishing him well in his new role. I look forward...

Member
Rachel Hopkins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
712 cc547-8
House
House of Commons

I should tell the House that I have known Sir Robert Chote as a friend for many years. Not just from that knowledge, but from an appreciation of his career in public service, I think the Government, as the hon. Member for Luton South (Rachel Hopkins) said, have made an...

Member
Greg Clark (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
712 c548
House
House of Commons

On behalf of the Scottish National party, I too congratulate Sir Robert Chote on his appointment. There is absolutely no doubt that he is more than eminently qualified to take up the role of the chair of the UK Statistics Authority. He is highly respected, as we heard from the...

Member
Brendan O'Hara (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
712 cc548-9
House
House of Commons

I am really disappointed that the hon. Member for Luton South (Rachel Hopkins) decided to take the time to make this a political issue, which it really is not. We want to welcome Sir Robert Chote to the new job, and thank the former chair, Sir David Norgrove. It is...

Member
Heather Wheeler (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
712 c549
House
House of Commons

Motion, That this House endorses the nomination of Sir Robert Chote for appointment as Chair of the United Kingdom Statistics Authority. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Heather Wheeler
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Debates
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
712 c549
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee
Date
29 March 2022
Reference
HC 1162 2021-22
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
15 September 2015
Reference
HC 459 2015-16
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Treasury Committee
Date
15 September 2015
Reference
HC 459 2015-16
House
House of Commons

Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL). Lords committee stage second day. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed to. Schedule 1: Office for Budget Responsibility, debated and agreed to. Clause 4: Main Duty of Office, under consideration. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.

Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills; Committee proceedings
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c179-226GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the right reverend Prelate. I hope that he will forgive me if I do not offer any thoughts on sin. I know my limitations. I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Turnbull, for reminding us that the Treasury Select Committee has not asked for this....

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c188GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, will the Minister clarify one or two of his remarks? I got a bit lost. I think I am right that he is now saying that the real distinction is exec versus non-exec, not expert versus non-expert, so we have moved on from the Explanatory Notes on those...

Member
Lord Peston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c182-3GC
House
House of Lords

Absolutely. I agree with value for money, but the issue that we are discussing is the independence of the OBR in the pursuit of its activities. It may have pursued a constrained raft of activities very efficiently, providing good value for money, but the issue is the constraint. The Treasury...

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c211GC
House
House of Lords

That is a very helpful thought. I shall in another context say that the parallel with the MPC is not at all inappropriate, but for example, in the MPC or the board of the FSA there is a good record in the UK in recent years of bringing in relevant...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c183GC
House
House of Lords

It seems to deal with what should be excluded rather than what should be included. Due to the way that legislation is constructed, however, I am told that by referring to what should not be considered, the link to what should be considered is there by implication and hard-wired into...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c221GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Higgins, put his finger on the central issue that we debated at some length on Monday and on which I have since had a chance to reflect. The Government seem to be taking two positions. One is that it is possible to separate economic...

Member
Lord Peston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c215GC
House
House of Lords

The amendment is not meant to constrain the OBR; it simply asks it to tell us what it has in mind, which I think is what the Minister is saying.

Member
Lord Peston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c216GC
House
House of Lords

Standards are falling.

Member
Lord Eatwell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c224GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I indicated earlier, what the Minister has proposed seems to be in line with the intention behind the amendment—namely, that the OBR and Treasury staff should not mix together over coffee or whatever. Should the situation be reversed at some point in the future, that may or...

Member
Lord Higgins (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c194GC
House
House of Lords

I did not create this problem. I did not set this body up. Unlike all other noble Lords present, I do not happen to be much in favour of it, but that is another matter. The fact is that our duty in this House, when a piece of legislation is...

Member
Lord Peston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c197-8GC
House
House of Lords

I hope that I can be helpful on that point. The Government expect the appointment process for the BRC to match up to the high standards of public appointments. A bespoke appointment process has been put in place for the BRC executive members involving advertising, independent involvement in the interview...

Member
Lord Sassoon (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 December 2010
Reference
722 c189-90GC
House
House of Lords