Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Wednesday, 1 December 2010, in the House of Lords.
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill [HL]
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL). Lords committee stage second day. Clauses 1 and 2 agreed to. Schedule 1: Office for Budget Responsibility, debated and agreed to. Clause 4: Main Duty of Office, under consideration. Grand Committee held in the Moses Room.
Secondary information
- Type
- Parliamentary proceeding
- Reference
- 722 c179-226GC
- Session
- 2010-12
- Department
- Treasury
- Legislative stage
- Committee stage
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Related items
-
Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL). Explanatory notes also published (HL Bill 23-EN)
Thursday, 21 October 2010
Bills
House of Lords
- Proceeding contributions
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c221GC (Link to this contribution) It seems to deal with what should be excluded rather than what should be included. Due to the way th...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c215GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Higgins, put his finger on the central issue that we debated at some ...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c216GC (Link to this contribution) The amendment is not meant to constrain the OBR; it simply asks it to tell us what it has in mind, w...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c182-3GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, will the Minister clarify one or two of his remarks? I got a bit lost. I think I am right ...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c211GC (Link to this contribution) Absolutely. I agree with value for money, but the issue that we are discussing is the independence o...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c183GC (Link to this contribution) That is a very helpful thought. I shall in another context say that the parallel with the MPC is not...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c188GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the right reverend Prelate. I hope that he will forgive me if I do not offer any th...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c224GC (Link to this contribution) Standards are falling.
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c194GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, as I indicated earlier, what the Minister has proposed seems to be in line with the intent...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c197-8GC (Link to this contribution) I did not create this problem. I did not set this body up. Unlike all other noble Lords present, I d...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c189-90GC (Link to this contribution) I hope that I can be helpful on that point. The Government expect the appointment process for the BR...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c193GC (Link to this contribution) Before the noble Lord finishes, I should like to comment. I really am having road-to-Damascus experi...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 722 c179GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I begin by repeating words that you have all heard many times before. If there is a Divisi...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c179GC (Link to this contribution) 9: Schedule 1, page 11, line 13, at end insert ““; and in making such nominations the Office will se...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c179-80GC (Link to this contribution) Amendment 9 is grouped with Amendment 15, which my noble friend Lord Eatwell will speak to. I have d...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c180-1GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I want to speak to Amendment 15 in this group, which is tabled in my name and that of my n...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c181-2GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, although the noble Lord, Lord Peston, says that this is not necessarily the opportunity to...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c183GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, in answer to the first question, to be clear again, it is certainly the case that there is...
-
Lord Turnbull | 722 c183GC (Link to this contribution) I suggest to the Minister one possible use of this third post: at some stage, it might be thought he...
-
Lord Skelmersdale | 722 c188GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister was in full flow and presumably wants to continue.
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c188GC (Link to this contribution) I think I had finished.
-
Lord Myners | 722 c188-9GC (Link to this contribution) Before the Minister sits down, I should like to make one point. There is a rather good article in th...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c187GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I agree with the point that just been made. It is true, as the Minister has said, that we ...
-
Bishop of Chester | 722 c187-8GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it would be a great mistake to regard being opposed to sin as the sole prerogative of the ...
-
Lord Turnbull | 722 c188GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord, Lord Higgins referred to making this more acceptable to the committee. I remember re...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c186GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am quite puzzled by this amendment because we are moving into unusual territory. We beli...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c186-7GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may indicate one thought that has occurred to me, which the Minister might like to reflect...
-
Lord Desai | 722 c187GC (Link to this contribution) I am sorry, my Lords, I did not speak in the Second Reading debate or on Monday. The point here is a...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c185GC (Link to this contribution) It will be interesting to know the Minister’s view on that one. I support the noble Lord in the view...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c185-6GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord. Although I am sure that the Minister will consider the amendm...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c185GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am a little worried about the remark ““covering a multitude of sins”” as I was chairman ...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c185GC (Link to this contribution) If the noble Lord and the right reverend Prelate will allow me to explain, I was using the term in t...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c184GC (Link to this contribution) 10: Schedule 1, page 11, line 13, at end insert ““, with the consent of the Treasury Committee of th...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c184-5GC (Link to this contribution) A peculiarity of Schedule 1 as drafted is that the members of the committee who are required to have...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c184GC (Link to this contribution) As I have said, I understand that; but when you are in the executive position, as the very distingui...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c184GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I thank the Minister for his clarifications, particularly in relation to the application o...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c183-4GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful for the noble Lord’s reaction to our Amendment 15; he said that he did not h...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c184GC (Link to this contribution) I want to clarify one matter. I was not for a minute suggesting that the Treasury Select Committee w...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c224GC (Link to this contribution) I was going to make two points. There is a further important consideration here, which is that we ha...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c224-6GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord. This debate has been much more valuable than I expected when we sta...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c224GC (Link to this contribution) They are slipping terribly. In paragraph 4.12, the first bullet point states, "““where the fiscal im...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c224GC (Link to this contribution) I am trying to be helpful; this is clearly rather more complicated than we may have thought a little...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c222GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may follow up that point. If Clause 5(3) is supposed to in some sense incorporate the noti...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c222GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, Clause 5(3) on page 3 of the Bill is the subject of Amendment 30. However, I entirely agre...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c222GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may try again. Under Clause 4(1) it is the duty of the office to examine and report on the...
-
Lord Newby | 722 c222-3GC (Link to this contribution) Everybody agrees on the substance. The problem is that the Minister is trying to turn words that are...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c223-4GC (Link to this contribution) Do not push me, because I can sit down now. All the notes say ““Resist””, but there is ““resist”” wi...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c223GC (Link to this contribution) Absolutely. We have just heard clarity provided from this incredibly obscurantist piece of drafting....
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c223GC (Link to this contribution) When we consider my amendment which refers to Clause 5(3), I shall make a quite separate point. The ...
-
Lord Burns | 722 c223GC (Link to this contribution) There is an issue with the drafting of Clause 5 and I wonder whether we are trying to make subsectio...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c223GC (Link to this contribution) We are all trying to get to the same end. I do not think that this is a rerun of what we were talkin...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c218GC (Link to this contribution) 19: Clause 4, page 2, line 20, at end insert ““in the light of the Government’s economic policy””
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c218-9GC (Link to this contribution) As Amendment 19 bears on the debate we have just had, I thought that it would be entirely appropriat...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c218GC (Link to this contribution) I beg leave to withdraw the amendment, but as the noble Lord has kindly produced a letter on the ear...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c221GC (Link to this contribution) I have, in fact, tabled an amendment to Clause 5(3)—Amendment 30, which we shall come to in due cour...
-
Lord Burns | 722 c221GC (Link to this contribution) I had assumed that the term ““economic policy”” encompassed all of the things that the Minister has ...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c221GC (Link to this contribution) Again, I am advised that the drafting of the amendment would not necessarily achieve that end. If we...
-
Lord Burns | 722 c220GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I have been struggling with this debate. I have had difficulty in seeing where it was goin...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c220-1GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Burns. I think that he gets it right. I am sympathetic to the ...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c214-5GC (Link to this contribution) In fact, as my noble friend has discovered, the letter was also available to the Committee today. In...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c215GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Higgins, has referred to Amendment 27 in the name of my noble friend ...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c216GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I regard the question of sustainability as very important, so much so that although I will...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c216-7GC (Link to this contribution) Indeed. The question is: what is appropriate to put in the legislation? There is an element here of ...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c217-8GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we are in danger of getting involved in metaphysics rather than econometrics. The absolute...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c218GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I tried to make clear in summary what the Government understand by ““sustainability””. It ...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c218GC (Link to this contribution) That is a very helpful reply, if I may say so, but we cannot go along with the main object of the wh...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c218GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, as I have said, I am happy to discuss it with the OBR again, but it clearly believes that ...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c214GC (Link to this contribution) The letter was intended to be helpful in advance of our discussion. It was sent around by e-mail ear...
-
Baroness Noakes | 722 c213GC (Link to this contribution) Before the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, takes this away to consider before he comes back on Report, he ...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c213-4GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, Clause 4 states: "““It is the duty of the Office to examine and report on the sustainabili...
-
Baroness Noakes | 722 c214GC (Link to this contribution) Is this a letter that only the noble Lord has received from my noble friend the Minister?
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c213GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful to the noble Baroness. She has given me some ideas to think about. I will go away and ...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c213GC (Link to this contribution) 18: Clause 4, page 2, line 20, at end insert ““on the basis of section 1(2)(a) and (b)””
-
Baroness Noakes | 722 c214GC (Link to this contribution) Yes. This is an unorthodox way of distributing letters to Peers.
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c214GC (Link to this contribution) I presume that the Minister was seeking to be helpful to the Committee so that we should have it in ...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c214GC (Link to this contribution) We have all been given one. They are over there.
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c214GC (Link to this contribution) Has my noble friend now got a copy?
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c212GC (Link to this contribution) The Ministers might care to look over their shoulders; they are being handed advice. There are two ...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c212-3GC (Link to this contribution) Since the noble Lord is coming to the end of his remarks, I wanted to put something into, if you lik...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c211GC (Link to this contribution) Some years ago, the Comptroller and Auditor-General and the PAC agreed that the Comptroller and Audi...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c211GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am grateful for the Minister's reply, although I am still confused about what he thinks ...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c211-2GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may help the noble Lord on the point of sensitivity. He is absolutely right: the Treasury ...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c210GC (Link to this contribution) I will come back to the noble Lord on that: I do not have the Bill in front of me. The point that I ...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c210GC (Link to this contribution) Will the noble Lord give me the paragraphs in Schedule 1 in which those propositions appear, so that...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c210-1GC (Link to this contribution) Paragraph 15 provides for the Treasury to make payment of grants in aid from the resources devoted b...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c210GC (Link to this contribution) I thought that it was, but paragraph 15 does not contain the propositions that the noble Lord sugges...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c209-10GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, let me see if I can help by making clear what is actually going on and what is intended he...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c209GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I presume that the Minister will confirm whether the budget is going to be published. If i...
-
Lord Burns | 722 c209GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I support the spirit of this amendment for the reasons put forward by the noble Lord, Lord...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c208-9GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, a well known and effective method of controlling any nominally independent body is by cont...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c208GC (Link to this contribution) 16: Schedule 1, page 15, line 18, at end insert— ““( ) The budget for the annual operations of the O...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c208GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, again I intended this to be a very brief debate, but already it has taken 22 minutes. I am...
-
Lord Desai | 722 c207-8GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I might try once more. There was a birth trauma when the OBR was established, and its indepe...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c207GC (Link to this contribution) It is clearly up to Robert Chote how he deploys his staff and what they do. Noble Lords obviously ha...
-
Lord Newby | 722 c207GC (Link to this contribution) Surely there is an easy solution: make the PA also responsible for freedom of information.
-
Lord Myners | 722 c206-7GC (Link to this contribution) So, the OBR will have its own information staff—it will not be relying on the Treasury for that. Of ...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c201GC (Link to this contribution) I cannot give a breakdown of exactly what they all do, although it would be possible to do so. The o...
-
Lord Myners | 722 c201GC (Link to this contribution) I find it extraordinary that the Minister has just disclosed to the Committee that the OBR has a tot...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c201GC (Link to this contribution) There should be no surprise when I say that there are 13 people because I answered a Written Questio...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c202GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I was trying to be brief. I introduced this amendment by asking just a few questions so th...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c200-1GC (Link to this contribution) It is simply a matter of fact at the moment, because the OBR is not yet constituted on a statutory b...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c201GC (Link to this contribution) Perhaps I may interrupt the noble Lord. Do his numbers include secretaries, computer programmers and...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c201GC (Link to this contribution) No, the noble Lord is right. The figure is the total number of staff.
-
Lord Peston | 722 c201GC (Link to this contribution) That figure of 13 includes secretaries, PAs and computer programmers?
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c202GC (Link to this contribution) 13: Schedule 1, page 14, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) The Office must make public the nature and mem...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c202GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, this is a simple question and I hope that the Minister will be able to reply. I have nothi...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c202-3GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, Amendment 13 is intended to create a legal obligation for the OBR to publish the nature an...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c206GC (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Turnbull, who, I think, gets it absolutely right. There i...
-
Lord Myners | 722 c206GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister has made a very important point. Can he clarify whether, because the committee of the O...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c205GC (Link to this contribution) I shall say a word about Amendment 34. It seeks to provide that: "““The Office will place in the pub...
-
Lord Turnbull | 722 c205-6GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it seems that an analogy is being drawn with the Monetary Policy Committee, whose minutes ...
-
Lord Myners | 722 c203-4GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I speak specifically to Amendment 14, which proposes that the budget responsibility commit...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c204-5GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, there are three amendments in the group, but I want first to say a brief word about the am...
-
Baroness Noakes | 722 c203GC (Link to this contribution) I am sorry to interrupt my noble friend. The amendment asks simply that the nature and membership of...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c203GC (Link to this contribution) For example, if the OBR wished to set up a sub-committee to deal with internal personnel matters, it...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c206GC (Link to this contribution) The noble Lord’s understanding is correct in so far as the OBR will be subject to freedom of informa...
-
Lord Myners | 722 c196GC (Link to this contribution) I agree with those comments. However, the duties described in Clause 5(2) are subject to guidance gi...
-
Lord Turnbull | 722 c195-6GC (Link to this contribution) I support the noble Lord, Lord Newby. As I understand it, the number of staff would be around 20. So...
-
Lord Newby | 722 c197GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, perhaps I may ask the noble Lord, Lord Peston, a quick question. Is he opposed to any staf...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c196-7GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am not in the least concerned about the precise drafting of amendments, because all our ...
-
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 722 c194GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I have not been provoked to rise by what the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, said about the Depa...
-
Baroness Noakes | 722 c193GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, before the noble Lord, Lord Eatwell, gets too carried away with joining in with any opposi...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c194GC (Link to this contribution) 12: Schedule 1, page 13, line 23, at end insert— ““( ) The staff must be employed solely by the Offi...
-
Lord Newby | 722 c195GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the provision in paragraph 8(2) of Schedule 1is sensible. It states: "““Staff are to be em...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c194-5GC (Link to this contribution) Listening to the previous debate, I am even more confused than I was before about which staff are no...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c200GC (Link to this contribution) I intervene because I think that the Minister is winding up on this amendment. Why is it assumed tha...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c199-200GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, we need to step back and, in answer to the fundamental challenge of my noble friend Lord H...
-
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville | 722 c199GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, perhaps I may make an analogy which is completely separate from that that we have been dis...
-
Lord Turnbull | 722 c197GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I am amazed at the sheer unrealism of the proposition of the noble Lord, Lord Peston. If t...
-
Baroness Noakes | 722 c197GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I profoundly disagree with the noble Lord, Lord Peston. I do not know what the initial pos...
-
Lord Peston | 722 c197GC (Link to this contribution) Yes, categorically. The Bill refers to them as the staff of the OBR. We can argue about language, bu...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c199GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, one could look worldwide and still fail to find better experts on the practical implicatio...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c198-9GC (Link to this contribution) This is a tricky issue but the balance has been struck by a combination of the noble Lord, Lord Turn...
-
Lord Burns | 722 c198GC (Link to this contribution) I support my noble friend Lord Turnbull and the noble Baroness, Lady Noakes. This amendment is total...
-
Lord Myners | 722 c190GC (Link to this contribution) Does the Minister share my concern that, because these two members have not been approved by the Tre...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c190GC (Link to this contribution) Certainly it is important that the non-executives are people of independent standing and stature who...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c190GC (Link to this contribution) Am I to understand that the Treasury Select Committee said that it wanted to be involved in the appo...
-
Bishop of Chester | 722 c190GC (Link to this contribution) Can the noble Lord comment on the fundamental point I made in my earlier contribution that, as it is...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c190GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, that is indeed the position. It may be extraordinary but, as I have tried to explain, it i...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c189GC (Link to this contribution) But the FSA now interviews non-executive directors from major financial institutions.
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c189GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I have not had a chance to read that article. If we have another break, I shall go and do ...
-
Lord Myners | 722 c189GC (Link to this contribution) Will the Minister confirm that appointments to this committee will follow the same procedures and pr...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c189GC (Link to this contribution) The FSA does not appoint the boards of directors. We are talking here about public sector boards, an...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c193GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, on one occasion when the Government that the late Iain Macleod was opposing accepted an am...
-
Lord Myners | 722 c193GC (Link to this contribution) I do not think we can allow it to go unnoticed that the Minister, in his reference to ““shoe leather...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c192-3GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, I hope that we might be able to dispose of this a little more speedily than some other mat...
-
Lord Barnett | 722 c192GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, it is really all about perception. We all know Robert Chote, the chairman; I respect him a...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c192GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, the theme running through all our proceedings has been that the OBR shall be seen to be in...
-
Lord Higgins | 722 c192GC (Link to this contribution) 11: Schedule 1, page 13, line 21, at end insert— ““( ) The Office shall not be located in the Treasu...
-
Lord Eatwell | 722 c191-2GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, having had the opportunity to listen to noble Lords who have taken part in the debate, I h...
-
Lord Sassoon | 722 c191GC (Link to this contribution) My Lords, on the latter point, I say again that the fact that it is intended that, as part of the no...
-
Bishop of Chester | 722 c191GC (Link to this contribution) My concern was that they are nominated by the office itself in an almost self-perpetuating sense. Wh...
- Subjects
- Audit Finance Fiscal policy Economic situation Economic policy Forecasts Public appointments Public expenditure Staff Public finance Public sector debt Treasury Treasury Committee Office for Budget Responsibility Chote, Robert
- Legislation
- Budget Responsibility and National Audit Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk
Show all contributions (152)
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-11 12:09:45 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_88988
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_88988
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/PROCEEDING_88988