Skip to main content

1-20 of 118 results for subject:"Claims Standards Council"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
1 March 2011
Reference
HC 591 2010-11
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Transport Committee
Date
11 January 2011
Reference
HC 591-ii 2010-11
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice for what reasons Kerobo's licence for claims management was suspended; what process his Department undertook before lifting that suspension; on what date that suspension was lifted; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Russell Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
10787; 514 c683W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what steps his Department takes to monitor licensed claims management companies' compliance with regulatory requirements; what process it follows to investigate suspected breaches of such compliance; which claims management companies have been so investigated in the last two years; and what the...

Asked by
Russell Brown (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 July 2010
Reference
10788; 514 c683-4W
House
House of Commons
Deposited by
Department for Constitutional Affairs
Type
Deposited papers
Date
3 March 2006
Reference
DEP 06/544
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Deposited papers
Date
2 March 2006
Reference
DEP 06/542
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for those assurances. In the light of what she has said, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. [Amendment No. 103 not moved.]

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c364GC
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful that we have someone as clever as the noble Viscount, who understands some of these issues. The issue of ““professional”” in the context that we were discussing in our previous debate is about trying to differentiate between what someone does in their working life and outside, and...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c354GC
House
House of Lords

We have been treated to an avalanche of promises. One can hardly wait for them to be realised, as we are sure they will, knowing the Minister’s track record. Against that background, I have no hesitation in seeking to withdraw Amendment No. 93. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c354GC
House
House of Lords

The history of professions goes back to 1700 and beyond. Mechanical engineers, for instance, are different because they are in a self-regulated profession and arrival is by examination. Botanists and all kinds of other people are members of professional bodies. There is no government regulation; there is an entirely self-regulated arrival. That...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c354GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendments Nos. 90 to 91:"Page 9, line 29, leave out ““may”” and insert ““shall””""Page 9, line 45, leave out ““may”” and insert ““shall””" On Question, amendments agreed to. [Amendment No. 92 had been withdrawn from the Marshalled List.]

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c349GC
House
House of Lords

I very much welcome what the Minister said, but perhaps I may press her on two further points. First, on referral fees, there is a great deal of concern over what are colloquially known as ““kick-backs”” between the claims management company, solicitors, doctors, other medical professionals and so on. I would hope that...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c352-3GC
House
House of Lords

I respond in the context of the report of the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee. The noble Lord, Lord Hunt, will recognise that I take the committee’s recommendations very seriously. I have undertaken to ensure that we consider them properly and I will bring forward appropriate amendments on Report. As I say, I frame my remarks...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c346-7GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 82:"Page 8, line 26, leave out ““permit or””" The noble Lord said: Amendments Nos. 82 and 85 are effectively a variation on the ““may””/““shall”” theme, in that they delete ““permit or”” to leave only ““require””, thereby toughening up a requirement. Amendments Nos. 83 and 84 highlight another closely related point on the nature of the...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c345-6GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 78:"Page 8, line 21, leave out ““may”” and insert ““shall””" On Question, amendment agreed to. [Amendments Nos. 79 to 81 not moved.]

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c345GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 88:"Page 9, line 27, leave out ““may enable”” and insert ““shall require””" On Question, amendment agreed to.

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c347GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for what she has said. Looking back on the many sittings of this Committee, I thank the noble Baroness for the many commitments that she has given. We have been greatly reassured by the way in which she has set about dealing with some longstanding problems...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c366GC
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness moves on to the next amendment, on advertising, I recall that the Better Regulation Task Force report instanced on page 24 an advertisement headed, ““Did the doctor or nurse make you worse?””. I am delighted to see that the Minister has a copy in front of her. The Arculus report...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c358-9GC
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 94:"Page 10, line 11, at end insert—" ““(1)   Regulations shall make, or shall require the Regulator to make, provision about the advertising standards required of an authorised person. (2)   Regulations under sub-paragraph (1) shall in particular provide that— (a)   advertising should be compliant with the codes of practice about professional conduct; (b)   advertising must...

Member
Lord Hunt of Wirral (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c354-8GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Viscount; that is a good point. My understanding is that certain professions carry with them certain standards and rules that apply in a broader context than simply the work that one does. The critical factor in this context would be how a person operated in...

Member
Baroness Ashton of Upholland (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2006
Reference
677 c349GC
House
House of Lords