1-20 of 49 results for subject:"Cleveland County Council"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.326 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.002 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Cleveland County Council"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Cleveland County Council" OR subject_ses:20761
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
If he will list the planning applications made to Teesside Development Corporation which have been opposed by (a) Stockton Borough Council and (b) Cleveland County Council and the number of jobs expected to be created by each project listed. - Inc figs and list.
If he will list the planning applications made to Teesside Development Corporation which have been opposed by (a) Stockton Borough Council and (b) Cleveland County Council and the number of jobs expected to be created by each project listed. - Inc figs and list.
Which developments or proposals by the Teesside Development Corporation have been opposed by (a) Stockton Borough Council and (b) Cleveland County Council.
Which developments or proposals by the Teesside Development Corporation have been opposed by (a) Stockton Borough Council and (b) Cleveland County Council.
SI 1996/657 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 April 1996.
SI 1996/657 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 April 1996.
SI 1996/398 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 April 1996.
SI 1996/398 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 April 1996.
Draft SI on North Eastern Sea Fisheries District (Constitution of Committee and Expenses) (Variation) (Negative instrument). Laid before Parliament to lie for 40 days during which period either House may resolve that the Order be not made. Made 31 March 1996 (SI 1996/1034). Coming into force 1 April 1996.
Draft SI on North Eastern Sea Fisheries District (Constitution of Committee and Expenses) (Variation) (Negative instrument). Laid before Parliament to lie for 40 days during which period either House may resolve that the Order be not made. Made 31 March 1996 (SI 1996/1034). Coming into force 1 April 1996.
SI 1995/2894 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 December 1995.
SI 1995/2894 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 1 December 1995.
What additional funds will be made available for bereavement counselling for employees affected by the abolition of Cleveland County Council. - None. (Failed OPQ)
What additional funds will be made available for bereavement counselling for employees affected by the abolition of Cleveland County Council. - None. (Failed OPQ)
Wednesday adjournment debate on Mr Stephen Spayne and Cleveland County Council.
Wednesday adjournment debate on Mr Stephen Spayne and Cleveland County Council.
Draft SI on Cleveland (structural change). Lords debate on motion to approve. Amendment negatived on division (20 to 73). Main question agreed to on question.
Draft SI on Cleveland (structural change). Lords debate on motion to approve. Amendment negatived on division (20 to 73). Main question agreed to on question.
Draft SI on Cleveland (structural change). Debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on division (310 to 223).
Draft SI on Cleveland (structural change). Debate on motion to approve. Agreed to on division (310 to 223).
Draft SI on Cleveland (Structural change) (Affirmative instrument). Approved by Parliament. Made 30 January 1995 (SI 1995/187). Coming into force for purposes of articles 4(2), and (3), 5 and 10 to 13 31 January 1995 for all other purposes 1 April 1996.
Draft SI on Cleveland (Structural change) (Affirmative instrument). Approved by Parliament. Made 30 January 1995 (SI 1995/187). Coming into force for purposes of articles 4(2), and (3), 5 and 10 to 13 31 January 1995 for all other purposes 1 April 1996.
Adjournment debate on local government reform in Cleveland.
Adjournment debate on local government reform in Cleveland.
That this House notes that the allegedly independent Local Government Commission recommended the abolition of Cleveland County Council and the sharing of its powers and responsibilities among the district authorities of Hartlepool, Langbaurgh, Middlesbrough and Stockton on Tees, that minutes of Langbaurgh Policy and Resources Sub-Committee for 8th March record that the districts 'had taken advice from the Treasury Solicitor, who recommended that the Districts serve an affidavit in support of both the Districts' submission and the Commission's recommendation', that the Sub-Committee exercising its plenary powers approved the adoption of the Government Law Officer's recommendation, that the tendering of advice to district councils in such circumstances by a Government law officer is clear evidence of how independent the Commission is not, that a truly independent review would require the parties to apply their own ample resources rather than permitting filching of unwarranted support from national government, that is now plain that the Commission finds its answers 'in the back of the book' and tailors its workings to suit and does this with national government collusion, that even adopting such manipulative tactics it makes a manifestly miserable mess of its machinations and that in view of this the Secretary of State should announce the abandonment of this discredited review, disband the equally discredited Commission and seek all-party consultations on the most credible means of agreeing a range of structures based on clearly defined criteria aimed towards effective efficient and reliable services suited to the particular community under assessment.
That this House notes that the allegedly independent Local Government Commission recommended the abolition of Cleveland County Council and the sharing of its powers and responsibilities among the district authorities of Hartlepool, Langbaurgh, Middlesbrough and Stockton on Tees, that minutes of Langbaurgh Policy and Resources Sub-Committee for 8th March record...
That this House notes that Mr David Ansbro, a commissioner on the Local Government Review of Cleveland, together with his fellow commissioners, recommended the abolition of Cleveland County Council, and the creation of four unitary district authorities for the Cleveland area; notes, too, that these same commissioners supported the establishment of a Tees Valley Development Company in an attempt to ensure the continuance of service delivery which would inevitably be undermined by the abolition of the county authority, this development company to be financed by the aforementioned prospective unitary districts, plus a fifth proposed for Darlington; notes that this development company would become another element in the booming sector of non-elected, non-accountable quangoes; notes further that the legal firm engaged by the district authorities to provide advice and legal expertise in the setting up in the new quango is Eversheds of Middlesbrough; notes with concern that the aforementioned Commissioner David Ansbro is also a senior partner of Eversheds, acting from its Leeds office; and, in view of the questionable nature of this relationship, calls upon the Secretary of State for the Environment to institute an urgent inquiry into the possible clash of interest inherent in this situation, and report to the House in full at an early stage and in any event before placing any order before the House relating to a change in the structure of local government in Cleveland.
That this House notes that Mr David Ansbro, a commissioner on the Local Government Review of Cleveland, together with his fellow commissioners, recommended the abolition of Cleveland County Council, and the creation of four unitary district authorities for the Cleveland area; notes, too, that these same commissioners supported the establishment...
Adjournment debate on abolition of Cleveland County Council.
Adjournment debate on abolition of Cleveland County Council.
How many representations he has received since the publication of the reports by the Local Government Commission on Cleveland and Durham and Derby.
How many representations he has received since the publication of the reports by the Local Government Commission on Cleveland and Durham and Derby.
To place in the Library the reasons for refusal of permission for Northumbrian Water to construct a waste incinerator at Portrack in Stockton-on-Tees, and the submission made to the inquiry inspector by Cleveland County Council in respect of the same. - Inc fact that copy of decision letter issued on...
To place in the Library the reasons for refusal of permission for Northumbrian Water to construct a waste incinerator at Portrack in Stockton-on-Tees, and the submission made to the inquiry inspector by Cleveland County Council in respect of the same. - Inc fact that copy of decision letter issued on...