Skip to main content

1-20 of 341 results for subject:"Community Fund"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers
Date
10 July 2007
Reference
HC 829 2006-07
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
28 November 2006
Reference
HC 20 2006-07
House
House of Commons

SI 2006/2915 (negative instrument). Together with an explanatory memorandum from Department of Culture Media and Sport. Coming into force in accordance with article 1

Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
7 November 2006
Reference
SI 2006/2915
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how much funding from the Building Safer Communities Fund has been allocated to (a) Leeds city council and (b) the basic command units of West Yorkshire Police within the Leeds city council district in each of the last three years.

Asked by
Colin Burgon (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 June 2006
Reference
447 c1830W; 76933
House
House of Commons

Letter dated 30/03/2006 from Lord Davies of Oldham to Viscount Astor of Hever regarding various issues arising from the committee stage of the National Lottery Bill. Incl. table.

Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords); Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Deposited papers
Date
4 April 2006
Reference
HDEP 2006/272
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response. The right reverend Prelate made some extremely good points in regard to his amendment. Indeed, I thought that the Minister—in contrast to my own amendment—rather conceded the case. If I may make so bold, the right reverend Prelate should be encouraged to bring his amendment back...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c1029
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister replies, I apologise for not being here at the start of the Committee. As a relatively new boy, I miscalculated the length of time that the previous business would take. I add to what my noble friend Lord Astor and the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, have said. What the Minister is telling...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c996-7
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for the Minister’s reply, which was not unexpected. I have two quick points to make. First, I entirely accept what my noble friend Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville said about there being an opportunity, when the Millennium Commission came to an end, to reconsider the amounts that would go to the...

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c1086
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 15:"After Clause 12, insert the following new clause—" ““APPORTIONMENT OF MONEY IN DISTRIBUTION FUND    In section 22 of the National Lottery etc. Act 1993 (c. 39) (apportionment of money in Distribution Fund) for subsection (3) substitute— ““(3)   Of the balance— (a)   25 per cent shall be allocated for expenditure on or connected with the arts, (b)   25 per cent shall...

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c1079-81
House
House of Lords

It was clear what I was seeking to indicate with regard to my right honourable friend’s answers. The department is involved in expenditure in areas where, particularly with regard to the Heritage Lottery Fund but also with regard to the distribution of sports funding, it is difficult to draw the dividing...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c1054
House
House of Lords

I support Amendment No. 11, moved by the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones. The Minister will no doubt say that inserting ““shall”” rather than ““may”” would be too prescriptive. Of course, the Government like prescription when they want to prescribe, but not when someone else wants to prescribe. I echo all the points made by...

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c1040-1
House
House of Lords

I declare an interest as the former chair of the New Opportunities Fund. I do not see that the amendment is necessary. Based on my experience, I read the word ““prescribed”” rather differently. I think everybody agrees that the amount of government prescription for the New Opportunities Fund is greater than is proposed for...

Member
Baroness Pitkeathley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c990
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to Members of the Committee for their contribution to this debate. We have at least one other group of amendments—possibly two—in which additionality will be discussed at greater length. With great respect to the noble Lord, Lord Brooke—I do not blame him for getting his shot in nice and early—I am...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c991-3
House
House of Lords

I am sure the noble Viscount, Lord Astor, will have plenty to say in reply, but I have a few questions for the Minister before then. He put up a fabulous smokescreen: we had broad strategy, large amounts of money and high-level themes. I am sure the intentions are honourable and all very splendid,...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c993-4
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister replies, I apologise to him. When I was moving Amendment No. 2, I should also have said that I was speaking to Amendment No. 4.

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c990
House
House of Lords

I apologise for intervening as the Minister is about to speak, but it is probably easier if I speak before him rather than after. I simply want to say, as none of us had the opportunity to do so after he wound up on Second Reading, that the challenge he threw down to...

Member
Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c990-1
House
House of Lords

Is the noble Baroness saying that these words which we are seeking to delete are not an extension of government power?

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c990
House
House of Lords

The Minister said he hoped that he had convinced me. He convinced me of one thing: how much I dislike the concept of the Big Lottery Fund. That is an argument I will reserve until later in the Bill, because I have not given up my campaign to restore the lottery’s original four...

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c994-5
House
House of Lords

I am only too happy to enlighten the movers of amendments in Committee if it is within my power to do so. However, I am not sure that on this occasion it is; hence my hesitancy. I spelt out that we were talking about very broad categories indeed. We have already had illustration...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c995-6
House
House of Lords

I apologise for being in a slight rush. The preceding business went marginally faster than I had expected. Clause 6 is about multiple licences. I understand that not only the current operators of the lottery but any possible future operators would think that multiple licences were a bad thing, as they would muddle the whole...

Member
Viscount Astor (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 March 2006
Reference
679 c975
House
House of Lords