Proceeding contribution from Viscount Astor (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 March 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.
National Lottery Bill
I apologise for being in a slight rush. The preceding business went marginally faster than I had expected. Clause 6 is about multiple licences. I understand that not only the current operators of the lottery but any possible future operators would think that multiple licences were a bad thing, as they would muddle the whole basis of the lottery—they would not give clarity—and they would not enable the amount of funds required to be raised. Why do the Government think that the provision is necessary? Do they not agree with all those who are involved in the business of managing the lottery, who all seem to regard this power as unnecessary? I look forward to hearing the Minister’s reply.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c975
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Community development Cultural heritage Artworks Community Fund Licensing Expenditure Distribution Grants National Lottery Distribution Fund Lotteries National Lottery Public expenditure Publicity Public participation New Opportunities Fund Voluntary organisations Big Lottery Fund Heritage Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
- Legislation
- National Lottery Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:16:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307453
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307453
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307453