Skip to main content

1-20 of 3,785 results for subject:"Department of Social Security"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Would it not be exceptional for the Government not only to reject the findings of the ombudsman and the Public Administration Committee, but to appeal and reject the findings of irrationality concerning the first recommendation of maladministration by the ombudsman? As welcome as the Court judgment is, is it not...

Member
David Burrowes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c432
House
House of Commons

One problem that we all face is the huge gulf in the figures quoted. Campaigners say that the cost of reimbursement is £4 billion over 60 years, peaking at £100 million a year, but the Government say that the cost is £15 billion. Has the Secretary of State considered the...

Member
Mike Weir (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c428
House
House of Commons

I was pleased to hear the Secretary of State recognise earlier that some of these people now face severe financial hardship as a result of the loss of their pension savings. Sadly, a number of my own constituents lost their pension savings in the Kalamazoo and United Engineering Forgings schemes....

Member
Julie Kirkbride (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c428-9
House
House of Commons

I welcome my right hon. Friend’s statement, particularly his concluding remarks, and I hope that there will soon be an end to the misery that so many of our constituents have experienced. I am thinking in particular of the 800 Allied Steel and Wire workers from Cardiff who lost their...

Member
Julie Morgan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c428
House
House of Commons

Many young people, some of whom will be in the Public Gallery now, will be listening to this exchange and wondering what is the point of starting a pension. Does the Secretary of State agree that the longer-term cost to the economy of young people not setting up pensions will...

Member
Justine Greening (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c431
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement today, and particularly for its tone. Opposition Members seem to have shifted their tone as we try to find a workable solution for people such as those suffering after the collapse of the British United Shoe Machinery scheme, who are not...

Member
Andy Reed (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c429-30
House
House of Commons

May I congratulate my constituent, Richard Nicholl, and other brave members of the Pensions Action Group? Some 5,000 people are members of some 20 schemes run by solvent companies, and that is the difference. As I understand it, from 28 February those people will not be entitled to compensation even...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c430
House
House of Commons

Like many Members, I welcome the Secretary of State’s tone, but the issue is more one of trust than tone. Our constituents must be wondering if the Government will ever admit that they are wrong. The Secretary of State has said that he has not yet decided on whether to...

Member
Graham Stuart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c431
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
David Laws (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c424
House
House of Commons

I welcome the tone of the Secretary of State’s statement, but does he agree that there is still a risk that this issue will escalate from a dispute between his Department and the occupational pensions authority into a dispute between Parliament and the Executive, because he has so far refused...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c425
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for his statement, and for the Government’s considerations on the money, which will help in respect of the compensation and the court costs. However, in my constituency there are almost 700 Dexion workers—as the Secretary of State knows because he has met a delegation...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c425
House
House of Commons

Does the Secretary of State not agree that the delay that we are now experiencing is as painful as any failure to get matters right in the beginning? Does he not also agree that the signal he is sending—for example, to those waiting for the outcome of the ombudsman’s Equitable...

Member
Lord Tyrie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c426
House
House of Commons

I welcome very much what my right hon. Friend has said today, and the way in which he has said it. However, does he not agree that there can no longer be any question but that the ombudsman was right to say that the information that Governments of both parties...

Member
Tony Wright (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c426-7
House
House of Commons

When I was a Department of Trade and Industry Minister, I had an adverse finding of maladministration regarding Barlow Clowes regulation, and I had no hesitation in paying compensation. How much have this Government so far spent on advice, civil service time and legal fees, how much more are they...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c427
House
House of Commons

I hope that the Secretary of State would acknowledge that refusing to accept the judgments of umpires is not a very attractive characteristic for sportsmen or for Ministers. Although I have never thought of him as a John McEnroe figure, he is showing a similar determination to ignore the successive...

Member
David Laws (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c423-4
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
David Laws (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c424
House
House of Commons

I can give the hon. Gentleman that assurance, because we will consider all aspects of the financial assistance scheme in the light of the recent ruling by the European Court of Justice.

Member
Lord Hutton of Furness (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c432
House
House of Commons

I welcome the fact that the Secretary of State is looking to review the financial assistance scheme. Some of the most difficult cases include some of my constituents who were involved in the APW scheme. Those under the age of 50, but close to it at the key point, some...

Member
Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c432
House
House of Commons

It is precisely the complexity and constitutional dimensions to the case that have now to be resolved, because it is in a judicial setting. As a lawyer, the hon. Gentleman should know that. There is no easy or fast-track way through this. Nor is it true to say that it...

Member
Lord Hutton of Furness (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c432
House
House of Commons

We have already done that in answer to a question from the hon. Gentleman’s boss, the right hon. Member for Witney (Mr. Cameron).

Member
Lord Hutton of Furness (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 February 2007
Reference
457 c429
House
House of Commons