Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Andy Reed (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 22 February 2007. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Occupational Pensions.


Occupational Pensions

I thank my right hon. Friend for his statement today, and particularly for its tone. Opposition Members seem to have shifted their tone as we try to find a workable solution for people such as those suffering after the collapse of the British United Shoe Machinery scheme, who are not eligible for the FAS as it stands. Will my right hon. Friend introduce his proposals in such a way that we can get a consensus on cost? That outstanding problem is preventing us from making progress, in that we seem to be unable to guarantee an annual figure. Will he also ensure that the scheme is extended to cover those who are not currently covered? They feel betrayed, in that others are being compensated while they are not. Will he also examine every possibility of generating such income from other sources, not just from the taxpayer?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
457 c429-30 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Appeals Damages Department for Work and Pensions Department of Social Security EU law Insolvency Legal costs Judgements Leaflets Maladministration Workplace pensions Pensions Misrepresentation Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration Pension funds Pension rights European Court of Justice High Court
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk