1-20 of 65 results for subject:"Detention and training orders"
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.44 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.004 seconds
- Search query
- subject:"Detention and training orders"
- We searched for
- subject_t:"Detention and training orders" OR subject_ses:479202
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
More
Primary member
More
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
More
Publisher
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 6 February 2025 to Question 27891 on Detention and Training Orders: Children, how many and what proportion of the children identified as having SEND (a) had and (b) did not have (i) an EHC plan and (ii)...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 6 February 2025 to Question 27891 on Detention and Training Orders: Children, how many and what proportion of the children identified as having SEND (a) had and (b) did not have (i) an EHC plan and (ii)...
Children’s special educational needs are assessed when entering custody, and are regularly reviewed.
To obtain the information requested, it would be necessary to undertake a detailed review of individual records, which could not be done without incurring disproportionate cost.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of children under 18 that have received detention and training orders have had an identified SEND issue since 2023.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of children under 18 that have received detention and training orders have had an identified SEND issue since 2023.
From 1 January 2023 to 31 December 2024, 429 children (under 18) were admitted into the Children and Young People Secure Estate under a detention and training order. Of these, 44% (where information is known) were identified as having special educational needs or disabilities. These figures are derived from responses gathered to inform placement decisions, and do not represent formal diagnoses.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders were released early under the (a) Home Detention Curfew, (b) End of Custody Licence and (c) Detention and Training Order early release schemes in each year since 2007; and what proportion of all prisoners released were released under each...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders were released early under the (a) Home Detention Curfew, (b) End of Custody Licence and (c) Detention and Training Order early release schemes in each year since 2007; and what proportion of all prisoners released were released under each...
It has not proved possible to respond to the hon. Member in the time available before Prorogation.
Clause 124, discussed with clauses 125-129 and Schedules 12-14. Agreed to on question. Clauses 125-129 and Schedules 12-14 agreed to. Clause 130 debated and agreed to. Clause 131, amendment 128, discussed with amendment 129 and 130. Amendment withdrawn. Amendment 130 negatived on division (5 to 8). Clause 131 agreed to. Clause 132, discussed with clauses 133, 134 and Schedule 15. Agreed to on question. Clauses 133-134 and schedule 15 agreed to. Clause 135, discussed with schedule 16 and amendment 120-122. Clause 135 agreed to on question. Schedule 16, amendment 122 negatived on division (5 to 8). Amendment 121 negatived on division (5 to 8). Schedule 16 agreed to. Clause 136 debated and agreed to on question. Clause 137, discussed with clause 138 and amendments 123, 133 and 146. Clause 137 agreed to on question. Clause 138, amendment 123 negatived on division (5 to 8). Amendment 133 negatived on division (5 to 8). Clause 138 under consideration.
Clause 124, discussed with clauses 125-129 and Schedules 12-14. Agreed to on question. Clauses 125-129 and Schedules 12-14 agreed to. Clause 130 debated and agreed to. Clause 131, amendment 128, discussed with amendment 129 and 130. Amendment withdrawn. Amendment 130 negatived on division (5 to 8). Clause 131 agreed to....
Clauses 124 to 130 agreed to. Amendment 130 to clause 131 negatived on division (5 to 8). Clauses 131 to 137 agreed to. Amendment 123 to clause 138 negatived on division (5 to 8). Amendment 133 to clause 138 negatived on division (5 to 8). Clause 138 agreed to. Amendment 122 to schedule 16 negatived on division (5 to 8). Amendment 121 to schedule 16 negatived on division (5 to 8). Schedules 12 to 16 agreed to. Written evidence reported to the House.
Clauses 124 to 130 agreed to. Amendment 130 to clause 131 negatived on division (5 to 8). Clauses 131 to 137 agreed to. Amendment 123 to clause 138 negatived on division (5 to 8). Amendment 133 to clause 138 negatived on division (5 to 8). Clause 138 agreed to. Amendment...
This Library briefing provides analysis of Parts 8 and 9 of the Bill. Part 8 concerns Youth Justice and Part 9 concerns Secure Children's Homes and Secure 16-19 Academies.
This Library briefing provides analysis of Parts 8 and 9 of the Bill. Part 8 concerns Youth Justice and Part 9 concerns Secure Children's Homes and Secure 16-19 Academies.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many children were released from (a) secure children's homes, (b) secure training centres and (c) young offender institutions at the mid-point of a Detention and Training Order with an intensive supervision and surveillance requirement and an electronic curfew in each of...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many children were released from (a) secure children's homes, (b) secure training centres and (c) young offender institutions at the mid-point of a Detention and Training Order with an intensive supervision and surveillance requirement and an electronic curfew in each of...
It is not possible to match the type of institution an offender is released from with the type of requirements imposed except at disproportionate cost; however, information on new electronic monitoring orders imposed on subjects serving a Detention and Training Order in England and Wales between 2010 and 2012 is contained in the following table:
| New
electronic monitoring starts on release from a Detention and Training
Order, England and Wales,
2010-121 | |||
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | |
| Adult
(aged
18+) | 498 | 422 | 397 |
| Juvenile
(aged 10 to
17) | 1,593 | 1,579 | 1,463 |
| Total | 2,091 | 2,001 | 1,860 |
| 1
These figures have been drawn from administrative data systems.
Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the
detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large
scale recording
system. Note: Age group is determined by age at the start of the electronic monitoring order. |
The Detention and Training Order is served half in custody and half under supervision in the community. Under-18s will be supervised by youth offending teams (YOTs) on release. Where an under-18 is assessed as presenting a high risk of reoffending then the YOT may put them on intensive supervision and surveillance for the supervision part of the DTO. This consists of a night time electronically monitored curfew and up to 25 hours a week of intensive supervision.
Although the DTO is a juvenile sentence those who turn 18 will remain on the order and may also remain under the supervision of a YOT until the order has ended.
The data are from the electronic monitoring service providers.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, what progress has been made in implementing Section 34 of the Offender Management Act 2007 enabling the Secretary of State to extend the range of establishments in which young people serving detention and training orders may be housed.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, what progress has been made in implementing Section 34 of the Offender Management Act 2007 enabling the Secretary of State to extend the range of establishments in which young people serving detention and training orders may be housed.
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many children have died (a) while serving the community part of a detention and training order under the supervision of a youth offending team and (b) within three months of completing a detention and training order since the inception of such...
To ask the Secretary of State for Justice how many children have died (a) while serving the community part of a detention and training order under the supervision of a youth offending team and (b) within three months of completing a detention and training order since the inception of such...
Tables showing number a) individual support orders 2004-05 b) action plan orders 2002-03 to 2006-07 c) referral orders 2002-03 to 2006-07 d) parenting orders 2000-01 to 2006-07 e) parenting contracts 2004-05 to 2006-07 f) dispersal orders 2004 to 2006 g) penalty notices for disorder 2004 to 2006 h) detention and training orders 2002-03 to 2006-07 i) anti-scoial behaviour orders 1999 to 2005 and j) warnings 1999 to 2006. 29 p.
Tables showing number a) individual support orders 2004-05 b) action plan orders 2002-03 to 2006-07 c) referral orders 2002-03 to 2006-07 d) parenting orders 2000-01 to 2006-07 e) parenting contracts 2004-05 to 2006-07 f) dispersal orders 2004 to 2006 g) penalty notices for disorder 2004 to 2006 h) detention and...
Letter dated 10/03/2008 from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath to Baroness Falkner of Magravine regarding the youth custody threshold in the context of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill. 3 p.
Letter dated 10/03/2008 from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath to Baroness Falkner of Magravine regarding the youth custody threshold in the context of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Bill. 3 p.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons in Greater London have been issued with a detention and training order in each of the last five years; and how many 12 to 17-year-olds have breached antisocial behaviour orders in Greater London in each year.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons in Greater London have been issued with a detention and training order in each of the last five years; and how many 12 to 17-year-olds have breached antisocial behaviour orders in Greater London in each year.
| Persons sentenced to detention and training orders (DTOs) in Greater London 2000–04(32) | |
|---|---|
| Number sentenced to DTOs | |
| 2000 | 738 |
| 2001 | 980 |
| 2002 | 1,023 |
| 2003 | 759 |
| 2004 | 794 |
| Source: RDS NOMS 8/11/2005 | |
| (32) The data shown for Greater London is made up from the two police force areas of Metropolitan police and City of London. |
Letter dated 20.12.2004 from Paul Goggins MP to Timothy Boswell MP regarding warrants for detention of juveniles. HO. 2004.
Letter dated 20.12.2004 from Paul Goggins MP to Timothy Boswell MP regarding warrants for detention of juveniles. HO. 2004.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of detention and training orders in preventing recidivism amongst young offenders.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of detention and training orders in preventing recidivism amongst young offenders.
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, what review has been undertaken of the use of four-month detention and training orders as provided for under the powers of the Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 in relation to dealing with disorder amongst young people. - Including ref to 8...
To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs, what review has been undertaken of the use of four-month detention and training orders as provided for under the powers of the Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 in relation to dealing with disorder amongst young people. - Including ref to 8...
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many detention and training orders have been made in each year since their introduction; and if he will make a statement. - Inc table.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many detention and training orders have been made in each year since their introduction; and if he will make a statement. - Inc table.
(Pursuant to reply on 09.02.2004 at 417 c1256-7W) To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in what circumstances magistrates can impose a detention and training order on an offender aged 12 to 14 years who has been convicted of breaching an anti-social behaviour order.
(Pursuant to reply on 09.02.2004 at 417 c1256-7W) To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in what circumstances magistrates can impose a detention and training order on an offender aged 12 to 14 years who has been convicted of breaching an anti-social behaviour order.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in what circumstances magistrates can impose a detention and training order on an offender aged 12 to 14 years who has been convicted of breaching an anti-social behaviour order. (Further information on 01.03.2004 at 418 c717-8W)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, in what circumstances magistrates can impose a detention and training order on an offender aged 12 to 14 years who has been convicted of breaching an anti-social behaviour order. (Further information on 01.03.2004 at 418 c717-8W)
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the changes in the costs of introduction of the detention and training orders. - Inc figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the changes in the costs of introduction of the detention and training orders. - Inc figures.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the early release scheme for detention and training orders issued since 2001.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment he has made of the early release scheme for detention and training orders issued since 2001.