Skip to main content

1-20 of 214 results for subject:"Freshwater fish"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Emma Reynolds
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
16 December 2025
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Programme motion agreed to on question. Clause 1 under consideration. Government amendment agreed to on division (10 votes to 5). Amendment negatived on division (5 votes to 10).

Lead member
Baroness Prentis of Banbury
Answering member
Stephanie Peacock; Luke Pollard
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Fisheries Bill (HL) Committee
Date
8 September 2020
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, for tabling these amendments. My noble friend Lady Jones of Whitchurch tabled similar elements in Committee following discussions with the National Federation of Fishermen’s Organisations, and we welcome the opportunity for the Minister to elaborate...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc69-70
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, for tabling these amendments. I support Amendments 8 and 12, to which I have added my name. This group of amendments returns to the topic covered in some detail in Committee but where concerns remain about the Government’s approach.

I believe I am right...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc83-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, for Amendment 10. I will speak to Amendment 16 in my name, which is retabled from Committee. It is a simple amendment that inserts in Clause 7(7) a reference to using the “best” available scientific evidence—a term used elsewhere in the...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc93-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 11, which was moved by the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, raises an important question in relation to the formulation of

joint fisheries statements. Indeed, what happens if the authorities disagree on the policies to be included or their suitability in relation to the overall fisheries objectives? This...

Member
Lord Grantchester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc99-100
House
House of Lords

Lords report stage. First day. New clause debated and withdrawn. Amendment to clause 1 agreed to on division (310 votes to 250). Other amendments debated and withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble; Baroness Bloomfield of Hinton Waldrist
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc24-345
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Teverson

1: Before Clause 1, insert the following new Clause—

“Fisheries principles

(1) Fish present within the UK Exclusive Economic Zone shall be a common resource owned by the United Kingdom on behalf of its citizens.

(2) Quotas or other rights to harvest fish whether allocated to vessels, public bodies, or individuals...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 c25
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we very much come back to something that is completely fundamental to the concept of this Bill and in terms of fisheries in the United Kingdom: who has ownership of these stocks. It is absolutely fundamental that they are owned by the nation. I am very aware that...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc25-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have a great deal of sympathy with the concept of the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Teverson. It is right that we discuss this. However, the more I look at it, the more complicated I feel even this new version will be. It will be very...

Member
Lord Randall of Uxbridge (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 c26
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speaking to Amendment 1, I will speak also to Amendments 4 to 6. What concerns me about all these is that if the UK and the EU fail to reach a deal by the end of the year, they will be bound by international law; namely, the...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc26-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I was very interested to hear the reasons the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, gave for bringing a slightly amended version of this amendment back on Report. While I am sympathetic to what I think he is trying to achieve, I have great difficulty in finding this amendment appropriate....

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 c28
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry that my noble and learned friend Lord Mackay of Clashfern is not able to join us just now. I hoped

that he would elucidate the picture with regard to case law on this. The noble Lord, Lord Teverson, mentioned a case, but there are other...

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc322-29
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lord Teverson has set out the reasons for this amendment, which we debated in Committee. Fish are a resource that is not owned by any one region, corporate body or individual. Unlike farm animals, which can be corralled and shepherded into barns, pens or open...

Member
Baroness Bakewell of Hardington Mandeville (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 c29
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Teverson, for raising this issue again, following our debate in Committee. It is a fundamental issue, which deserves more attention.

Who owns the resources in our coastal waters? How can it be that, once a quota of fish is issued,...

Member
Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc29-30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this proposal’s reference to “the United Kingdom” requires consideration, given the matters that arise in connection to it from devolution. It is true that fisheries are devolved, and so in respect of rights of the United Kingdom and fish, these will be devolved. It is therefore quite important...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 c30
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful the noble Lord for his amendment and to all noble Lords who have taken part in the debate.

As noble Lords will be aware, the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea—UNCLOS—establishes that the UK has sovereign rights to manage the marine resources within...

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc30-2
House
House of Lords

Can my noble friend the Minister comment on what the noble Baroness, Lady Jones of Whitchurch, said? She seemed to be in favour of arbitrarily taking away fisherman’s quotas that are already established, which sounds like a pretty draconian socialist measure to me.

Member
Earl of Caithness (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 c32
House
House of Lords

On the noble Baroness’s intention, we do not think that it would be helpful to the fishing industry to take away the current system of FQAs and the certainty that that allocation provides. That is why the Government are clear that we do not intend to change the current quota...

Member
Lord Gardiner of Kimble (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 c32
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank everybody, particularly the Minister, for their contributions.

I am sure that the noble Earl, Lord Caithness, believes that the Scottish legal system is far better than the English one and that our problems in this regard may be with the English system, but my amendment does not...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 June 2020
Reference
804 cc32-3
House
House of Lords