Skip to main content

1-20 of 488 results for subject:"Future rapid effect system"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what the cost to the public purse of the Future Rapid Effect System project has been to date; what estimate he has made of the final cost; and what assessment he has made of the operational capability of vehicles fitted with such...

Asked by
Michael Dugher (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 July 2011
Reference
66687; 531 c866W
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the status of the Future Rapid Effect System Utility Variant programme; and what consideration has been given to procuring a vehicle already in service with other armies to meet the requirement.

Asked by
Lord Moonie (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 November 2010
Reference
4112; 722 c399WA
House
House of Lords
Deposited by
Ministry of Defence
Type
Deposited papers
Date
23 November 2010
Reference
DEP2011-0009
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence if he will estimate the cost of cancelling the (a) purchase of the RC-135 Rivet Joint aircraft and (b) Future Rapid Effect System Specialist Vehicles contract.

Asked by
Angus Robertson (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 July 2010
Reference
4597; 512 c624W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what export potential was claimed by (a) BAE Systems and (b) General Dynamics as part of their proposals to upgrade the Future Rapid Effects System armoured reconnaissance vehicle contract.

Asked by
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 April 2010
Reference
508 c1206W; 325159
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence with reference to his statement of 22 March 2010, Official Report, columns 3-4WS, on armed forces equipment, whether the base platform for the Future Rapid Effects System (FRES) is now finalised for all aspects of the FRES programme; whether there will be...

Asked by
Nick Harvey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 March 2010
Reference
508 c642-3W; 324287
House
House of Commons

(2) what advice his Department received from the Treasury in connection with the choice of design for the Future Rapid Effects System armoured reconnaissance vehicle.

Asked by
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 March 2010
Reference
508 c13W; 323170
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence (1) when he expects to announce his decision on the preferred bidder for the Future Rapid Effects System armoured reconnaissance vehicle contract;

Asked by
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 March 2010
Reference
508 c13W; 323169
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is completely right. As I said to the hon. Member for Crosby (Mrs. Curtis-Thomas), the prime point was the UN vote, on which the vote in this House was conditional. I agree with my hon. Friend, however; there is an unparliamentary word and I cannot use it,...

Member
Lord Soames of Fletching (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c80-2
House
House of Commons

I am a little confused as to whether the hon. Gentleman is arguing from a multilateralist or unilateralist point of view. Will he clarify that? We now have what is basically a minimum deterrent, and we need to keep that minimum deterrent in order to be part of the negotiations,...

Member
Linda Gilroy (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c66
House
House of Commons

I think that it is universally accepted that delay in programmes costs money. The idea that one saves money by postponing programmes is not historically proven. Of course, one forgoes the immediate expenditure, but ultimately one drives up the cost. As I understand it, that has happened in the case...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c53
House
House of Commons

We want the NPT talks in 2010 to be a great success, and we will put a huge amount of effort into making sure that they are a success.

Member
Willie Rennie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c67
House
House of Commons

This is how things have happened in the past: we have made the main decision at main gate—we have not made all the decisions well in advance of when it was necessary. I am a multilateralist, but I want to get rid of weapons, and I want to ensure that...

Member
Willie Rennie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c66-7
House
House of Commons

I am listening carefully to the complicated argument that the hon. Lady is advancing, and I am little puzzled by it. Is she seriously saying that rather than ask the private sector to produce a variety of equipment of one sort or another and then seek to sell it to...

Member
James Gray (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c87
House
House of Commons

Yes, but against what criteria? The hon. Member for Dunfermline and West Fife (Willie Rennie) alluded to OCCAR’s role and its importance. Its role is to get consensus between countries on procuring specific pieces of kit. I hope that colleagues understand why that is such an attractive option. It means...

Member
Claire Curtis-Thomas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c87-8
House
House of Commons

Of course that is the position. We do not know what the numbers are—we have not had access to the books. I am telling the hon. Lady and the House what my right hon. Friend the shadow Chancellor is proposing as we speak. I think that you will require us...

Member
Gerald Howarth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c51
House
House of Commons

The Minister says that priority will be given to the FRES Scout vehicle, as the Under-Secretary of State for Defence, the hon. Member for Grantham and Stamford (Mr. Davies) has said before. May we have an indication of the time scale in which that vehicle will come on stream? This...

Member
Lord Arbuthnot of Edrom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c42
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend knows, I have been reading the local press. No matter what we say, the speculation continues as to the future of Devonport. We have said that we need Devonport as a naval base, and that that will not be solely for submarine work. No matter how...

Member
Bob Ainsworth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c47
House
House of Commons

Of all the decisions that Governments take, surely none is more important than that to send our forces overseas into combat. When that is done, I am sure the whole House agrees that it is imperative that everything is done to enable our forces to have the maximum opportunity to...

Member
Gavin Strang (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c60-1
House
House of Commons

In every defence debate we rightly pay tribute to the armed forces and the service that they give to the nation, and it is even more important for us to do that in the context of defence procurement. In my view, however, the best tribute that the House could pay...

Member
Willie Rennie (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 April 2009
Reference
491 c61-2
House
House of Commons