Skip to main content

1-20 of 120 results for subject:"Goodwin, Fred"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee reports (Government responses); Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration Select Committee
Date
20 November 2012
Reference
HC 728 2012-13
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Public Administration Select Committee
Notes
Motion made to leave out "Chair's Draft Report" and insert "draft Report proposed by Paul Flynn". The Committee divided. Amendment negatived on division (2 to 4). Motion to add a Paragraph after 1-24. The Committee divided. Agreed to on division (4 to 1). Motion that the Report be the Second Report of the Committee to the House. The Committee divided. Agreed to on division (5 to 2).
Date
17 July 2012
Reference
HC 19 2012-13
House
House of Commons
Sir Fred Goodwin has recently been censured by the Financial Services Authority in its report on the RBS shambles. Can the Prime Minister tell the House when the Honours Forfeiture Committee will be sitting, to consider stripping this man of his ill-deserved knighthood?
Asked by
David Ruffley (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 January 2012
Reference
539 c292
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether, in the light of the Financial Services Authority’s report The failure of the Royal Bank of Scotland, they propose to disqualify Sir Tom McKillop and Sir Fred Goodwin under the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1981.

Asked by
Lord Myners (Labour)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 December 2011
Reference
14316; 733 c345WA
House
House of Lords

The right hon. Gentleman raises an important point, but it ties in with the earlier point about how all this can be enforced. As I said earlier, however, those who take an idea that modern methods of communication mean that they can act with impunity may well find themselves in...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c637
House
House of Commons

I think that will be very much a matter for the discretion of the judge hearing the case. I do not think that one could make some kind of blanket pronouncement as to how it would operate in practice, but clearly the merit of the course of action being proposed...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c640
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend will appreciate, that is ultimately a matter for my colleagues in the Ministry of Justice, with regard to the legal aid framework, but it is right to say that the vulnerable in our society do enjoy legal aid in order to bring cases before the courts...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c642-3
House
House of Commons

Scotland enjoys and has always enjoyed a separate legal system. It follows that orders made by the courts of England and Wales, generally speaking, do not have application there, although there are at times some exceptions.

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c638
House
House of Commons

I have to say to my hon. Friend that I am not quite sure what they are supposed to butt out from. If he is suggesting that they should butt out from doing their duty and following the judicial oath that they take, I am afraid I disagree with him.

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c639
House
House of Commons

I would assume that across the House it would be considered that the abuse of parliamentary privilege to subvert court orders made with the express intention of implementing Parliament's legislation through the courts is improper. Ultimately, however, that is a matter for this House and Mr Speaker to regulate, and...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c637
House
House of Commons

Yes, and that is why I hope the route proposed by my right hon. Friend the Prime Minister today commends itself to the House.

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c641
House
House of Commons
Lead member
John Whittingdale
Answering member
Dominic Grieve
Department
Attorney General
Type
Urgent questions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c633-4
House
House of Commons

I would not normally comment on the role I have to carry out as Attorney-General in the public interest and not as a Minister of the Crown, but there is no secret in the fact that, as matters stand, I have received no referral whatsoever in relation to any civil...

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c637
House
House of Commons

Yes.

Member
Dominic Grieve (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c638
House
House of Commons

We would expect a Joint Committee to uphold the necessary rights of Parliament and defend them, but would any Committee not also have to look at the separate question of whether it can be right for someone to use Twitter or electronic media of other kinds to place something in...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c637
House
House of Commons

Does the Attorney-General accept that the fault in this case lies with Parliament itself in not repealing the Human Rights Act 1998? As the then shadow Attorney-General, I advocated doing that and it remained Conservative policy until the general election. Does he accept that it is about time that we...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c637-8
House
House of Commons

I hope that the Attorney-General will acknowledge the independence of the Scottish courts. Will he confirm that no application was made for an interdict at the Court of Session on the news reported in the Sunday Herald yesterday and will he assure the House that no legal action will be...

Member
Eilidh Whiteford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c638
House
House of Commons

I welcome the review. Twittergate is just the latest example of judicial legislation distorting the balance of human rights under article 8 of the European convention. There have been other examples recently, including the defeating of deportation orders under article 8 in relation to convicted criminals. The Attorney-General rightly points...

Member
Dominic Raab (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c642
House
House of Commons

With about 75,000 people having named Ryan Giggs on Twitter, it is obviously impracticable to imprison them all, and with reports that Giles Coren also faces imprisonment— ... The question is, what is the Government's view on the enforceability of a law that clearly does not have public consent?

Member
John Hemming (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c638
House
House of Commons

I should like to return to the response to the question asked by my hon. Friend the Member for Middlesbrough (Sir Stuart Bell). Although it is right that we do not have a strict separation of powers in this country, we adhere to the principle to some degree as it...

Member
Chuka Umunna (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 May 2011
Reference
528 c638
House
House of Commons