Skip to main content

1-20 of 21 results for subject:"Graduated pensions"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motions to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Altmann
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 cc107-115GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move that the Grand Committee considers the State Pension and Occupational Pension Schemes (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2016 and the Pensions Act 2014 (Consequential and Supplementary Amendments) Order 2016. As the regulations and order both make provisions relating to the new state pension, it seems sensible...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 cc107-110GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for her introduction of these regulations and the order and note that the two Motions are to be taken en bloc.

The draft Explanatory Memorandum reminds us that this is the second tranche of affirmative legislation which is needed to support the introduction of the...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 cc110-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord for his contribution to this technical debate. He has raised several questions, and I will attempt to answer some of them. If he requires further answers, I will of course write to him.

It is indeed the case that the analysis conducted...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 cc112-3GC
House
House of Lords

I was not suggesting that women were going to lose out. My point was that there is movement towards equalisation with men, although that is some time in the distance—I think that the 2040s has been the calculation.

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 c113GC
House
House of Lords

The equalisation between men and women of state pension payments may come in the future but, in the mean time, notwithstanding whether they get slightly less than men—the gender gap will be much narrower—over their lifetime they will get more, because the average woman lives longer than the average man....

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 cc113-4GC
House
House of Lords

In relation to the year we are just about to enter—2016-17—is the Minister saying that there will not be extra net revenue in the system that year from the abolition of contracting out?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 c114GC
House
House of Lords

Of course that is not what I am saying. I am saying that we have to look at the state pension over the long term. National insurance is paid now but it relates to liabilities that will be paid over a long period of time, and Governments, quite rightly, have...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 cc114-5GC
House
House of Lords

Would the Minister mind looking at the record after this and perhaps writing where she has not been able to cover matters this afternoon?

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 c115GC
House
House of Lords

Yes. As I said, I am more than happy, if there are issues that have not been covered, to write to the noble Lord.

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 February 2016
Reference
768 c115GC
House
House of Lords

Draft SI on social security benefits uprating (Affirmative instrument). Laid before Parliament for approval by resolution of each House. Coming into force on 1, 6, 7, 8 and 10 April 1997 as indicated.

Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
DEBATE;CH 19 FEB 1997;LH 20 FEB 1997
Date
31 January 1997
Reference
SI 1997/543
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

Pensions Bill (HL). Commons amendments considered and agreed to (Lords).

Department
Department of Social Security
Type
Debates on bills
Date
12 July 1995
Reference
565 c1683-716,1729-92
House
House of Lords

Pensions Bill (HL). Committee stage twenty-second sitting (afternoon). Clauses 150 to 153 and 155 to 162 agreed to, clauses 150, 155 to 157, 159, 161 and 162 as amended. Clauses 85 and 154 disagreed to. Schedules 6 and 7 as amended agreed to. New clauses considered.

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
22 June 1995
Reference
SCD
House
House of Commons

Whether married women in receipt of small graduated pensions will be eligible to receive the increase in pension directly attributable to the imposition of VAT on domestic heating fuel.

Asked by
Jack Straw (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 1994
Reference
236 c841W
House
House of Commons

To comment on the circumstances in which, following the decision of the Social Security Commissioner in 1992 (CP/64/1988), married women entitled to a category B retirement pension will be entitled to increments to that pension when their husbands defer retirement beyond their 65th birthday.

Asked by
Baroness Corston (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
13 July 1993
Reference
228 c475-6W;228 c473-4W
House
House of Commons

SI 1992/3194 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 13 January 1993.

Department
Customs and Excise
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
23 December 1992
Reference
SI 1992/3194
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

If he intends to appeal against the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Mrs Ethel Pearse given on 12th June.

Asked by
Ray Whitney (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
15 July 1992
Reference
211 c804W
House
House of Commons

SI 1992/1700 (Negative instrument). Coming into force 5 August 1992.

Department
Lord Chancellor's Department
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
15 July 1992
Reference
SI 1992/1700
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

What percentage of people currently retiring will receive more than the basic rate by way of retirement pension - Incl figures & fact that precise information requested is not available

Asked by
David Price (Conservative)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 November 1990
Reference
178 c667-8W;178 c665W
House
House of Commons

To estimate no of pensioners in Scotland & UK who have paid insufficient contributions & who therefore do not receive full basic national insurance retirement pension; & no of pensioners in Scotland & UK who have their basic national insurance retirement pension enhanced by increments from deferring date of their...

Asked by
John McAllion (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Social Security
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 July 1989
Reference
157 c146W
House
House of Commons