Skip to main content

1-20 of 30 results for subject:"Hamilton, Neil"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Transcript of the judgment in the Hamilton v Al Fayed appeal. Attorney General. 1999.

Deposited by
Attorney General
Type
Deposited papers
Date
10 June 1999
Reference
Dep 99/1135
House
House of Commons
Answered by
Ross Cranston (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
22 April 1999
Reference
329 c1044
House
House of Commons
To ask Mr Attorney General, If he will make a statement on the cost of the intervention in the Hamilton v Al Fayed case in the Court of Appeal on behalf of the House of Commons.
Asked by
Christopher Chope (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
22 April 1999
Reference
329 c1044; 80377
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Attorney General, if he will place a copy of the authorised transcript of the judgment in the Hamilton v Al Fayed appeal in the Library. (Question wrongly ascribed to Mr David Hanson in Daily Part - corrigendum at 328 c1226).

Asked by
Andrew Dismore (Labour)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 1999
Reference
328 c579W, (corrigendum) 1226;328 c579W; 79838
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Attorney General, what factors underlay the decision of the Solicitor General to intervene in the Hamilton v Al Fayed case.

Asked by
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 1999
Reference
77739; 328 c124-5W
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Attorney General, if he will place the Solicitor General's skeleton argument and appendices used in the Hamilton v Al Fayed case in the Library, together with a transcript of proceedings. - Inc fact that have arranged for a copy to be placed in Library.

Asked by
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 1999
Reference
77126; 327 c712W
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Attorney General, when he was first notified of (a) the libel claim by Neil Hamilton and (b) the Court of Appeal hearing on appeal from the Queen's Bench Division; when he first responded to Mr Hamilton's solicitors; when he decided to intervene in the case; when he...

Asked by
Peter Bottomley (Conservative)
Answering body
Solicitor General
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 March 1999
Reference
77125; 327 c711-2W
House
House of Commons

The Solicitor General's skeleton argument and appendices used in the Neil Hamilton v Al Fayed case, with a note on the role of the Attorney General as intervenor on behalf of the Speaker and authorities of the House of Commons. Attorney General. 1999.

Deposited by
Attorney General
Type
Deposited papers
Date
17 March 1999
Reference
Dep 99/592
House
House of Commons

Christmas recess motion speech on self-regulation of the House, in particular relating to Neil Hamilton.

Member
Ann Widdecombe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 December 1997
Reference
303 c270-3
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion to approve the seventh and eighth reports of the Committee on Standards and Privileges. (HC 240 and HC 261, 1997/98). Agreed on question. Amendment withdrawn.

Lead member
Lord Sheldon
Answering member
Baroness Taylor of Bolton
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
17 November 1997
Reference
301 c81-120;301 c81-121
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee on Standards and Privileges
Notes
Received 06.11.97; DEBATE;17 NOV 1997
Date
5 November 1997
Reference
HC 261 1997/98
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee on Standards and Privileges
Date
27 October 1997
Reference
HC 261 1997/98
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee on Standards and Privileges
Notes
DEBATE;17 NOV 1997
Date
31 July 1997
Reference
HC 240 1997/98
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee on Standards and Privileges
Notes
Received 03.07.97; TAGGED FOR DEBATE;17 NOV 1997
Date
2 July 1997
Reference
HC 30 1997/98
House
House of Commons

That this House regrets that the honourable Member for Tatton, a former Vice Chairman of the Small Business Bureau, who lists bibliomania as a special interest, has instructed his solicitor to threaten legal action against Books etc. in Victoria Street and other bookshops in Westminster, in his Tatton constituency and,...

Primary sponsor
Gordon Prentice (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
27 February 1997
Reference
597
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee on Standards and Privileges
Notes
Received 13.02.97
Date
11 February 1997
Reference
HC 226 1996/97
House
House of Commons

Debate on a motion that the matter of alleged improper pressure brought to bear on Select Committee on Members Interests in 1994 be referred to Select Committee on Standards and Privileges. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Andrew Miller
Answering member
Lord Newton of Braintree
Department
Leader of the House of Commons
Type
Parliamentary proceedings
Date
16 October 1996
Reference
282 c851-9;282 c853-61
House
House of Commons

Defamation Bill (HL) (Bill 127 1995/96): Parliamentary privilege. House of Commons Library Research Paper 96/61.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
16 May 1996
Reference
RP96-61

That this House regrets the delay in dealing with complaints to the former Select Committee on Members' Interests and Privileges respectively; in particular notes the extreme delay in dealing with a complaint against the honourable Member for Tatton made to the Members' Interests Committee; and calls on the Parliamentary Commissioner...

Primary sponsor
Lord Carlile of Berriew (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Early day motions
Date
16 February 1996
Reference
444
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Select Committee on Members' Interests
Notes
Received 07.06.95
Date
6 June 1995
Reference
HC 460 1994/95
House
House of Commons